Across the crypto market, a strange pattern has captured traders’ attention. Filecoin (FIL), Storj, Arweave (AR), and Internet Computer (ICP) have been pumping in near lockstep, defying the expectation that decentralized infrastructure adoption occurs independently. On closer inspection, this isn’t organic growth. It appears to be a calculated rotation of capital, an orchestrated liquidity cycle posing as momentum. Over the past week, ICP rallied by 240% in just 6 days, while FIL nearly tripled. To the untrained eye, this might signal new adoption or institutional interest. But under the surface, it looks more like a synchronized exit. Smart money often enters these narratives early, fuels social chatter, and then quietly distributes to latecomers chasing “the next breakout.” As one chart cools off, another lights up, creating the illusion of continuous sector-wide strength. In reality, the same capital simply flows from one token to another. These infrastructure tokens share a common narrative: decentralized storage and computation as the backbone for AI and Web3. Retail traders are drawn to the idea of “AI infrastructure on blockchain,” but the price behavior suggests coordinated movements rather than varied market confidence. When one starts dumping, they all follow, a telltale sign of rotational liquidity rather than fundamental expansion. The current phase looks like the distribution stage. Early buyers have secured massive returns, and now attention is being redirected toward slower-moving assets under the same “old coin squeeze” storyline. This is classic market playbook behavior: create momentum, draw in volume, exit into strength, and leave traders holding consolidation bags. If the rotation pattern continues, the next phase will likely see profits from ICP and FIL channeled into smaller-cap extensions of the same narrative. Traders chasing late entries risk being caught on the wrong side of an infrastructure hype cycle that has already been fully priced in by institutional actors weeks ago. Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this storyAcross the crypto market, a strange pattern has captured traders’ attention. Filecoin (FIL), Storj, Arweave (AR), and Internet Computer (ICP) have been pumping in near lockstep, defying the expectation that decentralized infrastructure adoption occurs independently. On closer inspection, this isn’t organic growth. It appears to be a calculated rotation of capital, an orchestrated liquidity cycle posing as momentum. Over the past week, ICP rallied by 240% in just 6 days, while FIL nearly tripled. To the untrained eye, this might signal new adoption or institutional interest. But under the surface, it looks more like a synchronized exit. Smart money often enters these narratives early, fuels social chatter, and then quietly distributes to latecomers chasing “the next breakout.” As one chart cools off, another lights up, creating the illusion of continuous sector-wide strength. In reality, the same capital simply flows from one token to another. These infrastructure tokens share a common narrative: decentralized storage and computation as the backbone for AI and Web3. Retail traders are drawn to the idea of “AI infrastructure on blockchain,” but the price behavior suggests coordinated movements rather than varied market confidence. When one starts dumping, they all follow, a telltale sign of rotational liquidity rather than fundamental expansion. The current phase looks like the distribution stage. Early buyers have secured massive returns, and now attention is being redirected toward slower-moving assets under the same “old coin squeeze” storyline. This is classic market playbook behavior: create momentum, draw in volume, exit into strength, and leave traders holding consolidation bags. If the rotation pattern continues, the next phase will likely see profits from ICP and FIL channeled into smaller-cap extensions of the same narrative. Traders chasing late entries risk being caught on the wrong side of an infrastructure hype cycle that has already been fully priced in by institutional actors weeks ago. Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story

Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem

2025/11/14 19:06

Across the crypto market, a strange pattern has captured traders’ attention. Filecoin (FIL), Storj, Arweave (AR), and Internet Computer (ICP) have been pumping in near lockstep, defying the expectation that decentralized infrastructure adoption occurs independently. On closer inspection, this isn’t organic growth. It appears to be a calculated rotation of capital, an orchestrated liquidity cycle posing as momentum.

Over the past week, ICP rallied by 240% in just 6 days, while FIL nearly tripled. To the untrained eye, this might signal new adoption or institutional interest. But under the surface, it looks more like a synchronized exit. Smart money often enters these narratives early, fuels social chatter, and then quietly distributes to latecomers chasing “the next breakout.” As one chart cools off, another lights up, creating the illusion of continuous sector-wide strength. In reality, the same capital simply flows from one token to another.

These infrastructure tokens share a common narrative: decentralized storage and computation as the backbone for AI and Web3. Retail traders are drawn to the idea of “AI infrastructure on blockchain,” but the price behavior suggests coordinated movements rather than varied market confidence. When one starts dumping, they all follow, a telltale sign of rotational liquidity rather than fundamental expansion.

The current phase looks like the distribution stage. Early buyers have secured massive returns, and now attention is being redirected toward slower-moving assets under the same “old coin squeeze” storyline. This is classic market playbook behavior: create momentum, draw in volume, exit into strength, and leave traders holding consolidation bags.

If the rotation pattern continues, the next phase will likely see profits from ICP and FIL channeled into smaller-cap extensions of the same narrative. Traders chasing late entries risk being caught on the wrong side of an infrastructure hype cycle that has already been fully priced in by institutional actors weeks ago.


Why FIL, STORJ, AR, and ICP’s Pumps Might Not Be What They Seem was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001529
$0.00000001529$0.00000001529
-11.46%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41