The post Ukraine Says It Disabled A Russian Submarine With An Underwater Drone appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. UNSPECIFIED, UKRAINE – OCTOBER 17: An SBU operativeThe post Ukraine Says It Disabled A Russian Submarine With An Underwater Drone appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. UNSPECIFIED, UKRAINE – OCTOBER 17: An SBU operative

Ukraine Says It Disabled A Russian Submarine With An Underwater Drone

2025/12/16 12:55

UNSPECIFIED, UKRAINE – OCTOBER 17: An SBU operative controls a SeaBaby naval drone on October 17, 2025 in Unspecified, Ukraine. The Security Service of Ukraine has unveiled upgraded SeaBaby naval drones. Ukrainian forces have been using them since 2022. The new version of the drones features more powerful engines, modern navigation and communication systems, strike FPV drones, turrets, and Grad multiple launch rocket systems. (Photo by Vitalii Nosach/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)

Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images

Ukraine claims it has carried out the first successful combat strike by an underwater drone against a submarine, damaging a Russian Kilo-class boat in the Black Sea port of Novorossiysk and potentially removing a key cruise missile launch platform from the war.

According to a statement published by Ukraine’s Security Service, or SBU, the attack targeted a submarine, using an underwater drone system called Sub Sea Baby. The SBU said the submarine was effectively put out of action. Kyiv estimates the vessel’s value at about $400 million dollars, adding that construction of a similar submarine under current sanctions could cost up to $500 million dollars.

Commentary from the Military Informant Telegram channel, widely regarded as having links to Russian military sources, suggested the unmanned system struck near the submarine’s stern, close to the vertical and aft horizontal rudders and the propeller.

The channel noted that even without a direct hit to the hull, damage to these vulnerable components could sideline the Kalibr-capable submarine for an extended period, adding that “even fleeing to Novorossiysk did not help,” a reference to the Black Sea Fleet’s earlier retreat from occupied Crimea.

According to The War Zone, if the submarine was seriously damaged, Russia would be left with just four Kilo-class boats operating as part of the Black Sea Fleet.

The strike comes amid ongoing peace negotiations, as Ukraine has stepped up increasingly bold operations designed to raise pressure on Moscow. In recent months, Ukrainian forces have struck Russian oil terminals, continued attacks on oil refineries across Russia, and most recently targeted multiple tankers belonging to Russia’s so-called shadow oil fleet.

The SBU said the strike was a joint operation conducted by the 13th Main Directorate of its Military Counterintelligence and the Ukrainian Navy.

Ukraine has previously demonstrated a willingness to attack high-value naval assets in port, striking the Kilo class submarine Rostov on Don twice while it was docked in Crimea, first in September 2023 and again in August 2024. “fter the war we will certainly write a textbook,” Vice Admiral Oleksiy Neizhpapa, Ukraine’s navy chief, told The Economist in July 2023.

Targeted Strikes

The SBU said the submarine carried four launchers for Kalibr cruise missiles, which Russia uses to strike Ukrainian cities. The attack fits a broader Ukrainian directive to strike launch platforms rather than intercept individual weapons.

That approach was also evident in the SBU’s earlier Operation Spiderweb in June, a complex covert campaign aimed at Russian long-range aviation. According to the Wall Street Journal, the operation was conceived after President Volodymyr Zelensky directed the agency to neutralize bombers launching missiles from beyond Ukraine’s air defense range; the operation involved smuggling drones into Russia and launching them from concealed mobile platforms near airfields.

KYIV, UKRAINE – SEPTEMBER 5: Head of the Security Service of Ukraine Vasyl Maliuk speaks during cancellation of postage stamp ‘Operation ‘Spiderweb’ at Ukraine State Aviation Museum on September 5, 2025 in Kyiv, Ukraine. SBU Chief Vasyl Maliuk took part in the redemption of a Ukrposhta stamp on Operation “Spiderweb” at the Ukraine State Aviation Museum. The redemption took place near the Tu-22M3 – aircraft of this type of the Russian Aerospace Forces were damaged and disabled during this operation. (Photo by Danylo Antoniuk/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)

Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images

In the months since, analysts estimate that roughly 20% of Russia’s combat ready long-range bomber fleet was rendered inoperable. Surviving aircraft were forced to redeploy to distant bases in Russia’s Far East, adding as much as 10,000 kilometers to individual missions and sharply increasing logistical complexity, operating costs and long-term wear on aging aircraft.

Ukraine’s Tech Navy

Following Russia’s full scale invasion, Ukraine has relied heavily on unmanned systems to offset Russia’s numerical advantage on land and at sea. As The New York Times editorial board wrote, “Inventive Ukrainian forces neutralized the once formidable Russian Black Sea Fleet using small, remote controlled boats loaded with explosives.”

Since 2023, Ukraine has invested increasingly in underwater naval drones. In May 2023, Kyiv unveiled the compact Toloka TK-150 unmanned underwater vehicle at a Brave 1 government defense technology event, signaling where Ukrainian development efforts were heading. As OSINT analyst H.I. Sutton has noted, “The Ukrainian military is secretive about these capabilities, and only reveals what it chooses.”

Ukraine initially employed naval drones to break Russia’s blockade of Ukrainian ports and to strike units of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Those attacks contributed to the neutralization of roughly a third of Russia’s fleet in the Black Sea. As a result, Russia was eventually forced to withdraw many of its remaining ships from occupied Crimea, relocating them to the port of Novorossiysk on Russia’s mainland.

Serhii Kuzan, chairman of the Ukrainian Security and Cooperation Center told me, “Due to the effective use of drones, Russian naval forces have lost the initiative at sea and have been forced to stay closer to Novorossiysk on the Russian mainland. These successes also enabled the reopening of the grain corridor despite Russia’s withdrawal from the agreement, effectively unblocking maritime trade.”

Ukrainian officials say the cumulative effect of these operations has fundamentally constrained Russia’s naval freedom of action in the Black Sea. Kyrylo Budanov, head of Ukraine’s military intelligence, has said Ukraine has effectively locked the Russian Black Sea Fleet at its permanent base in Novorossiysk.

Russia’s Black Sea Fleet warships take part in the Navy Day celebrations in the port city of Novorossiysk on July 30, 2023. (Photo by STRINGER / AFP) (Photo by STRINGER/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

According to Budanov, Russian combat vessels now rarely sail beyond Novorossiysk, leaving port primarily to launch missile strikes before returning quickly to base.

Kyiv has also leveraged its growing naval drone capability to strike high value infrastructure targets, including the Kerch Bridge linking Russia to occupied Crimea. Analysts have speculated that a June attack on the bridge may have involved Ukraine’s Marichka underwater drone, a six meter long multipurpose strike platform reported to have a range of up to 1,000 kilometers.

By early 2023, Sevastopol harbor was protected by as many as six layers of nets and boom defenses aimed specifically at blocking Ukrainian naval drones. The expanded defenses suggest the Kremlin has been forced to extend anti-drone coverage across occupied Crimea, both to protect the Kerch Bridge and to shield remaining naval assets relocated to Novorossiysk.

Dmitry Gorenburg, a researcher with the Center for Naval Analyses, told me, “Prior to the war, Russia was seen as the controlling maritime power in the Black Sea. This is no longer the case, and sea control is now contested and will remain so for the foreseeable future.”

For Kyiv, each innovation has been guided by cost asymmetry. “Maritime drones are relatively sophisticated yet inexpensive to produce, with costs ranging from $250,000 to $300,000 per unit,” said Kuzan.

“It is worth noting that even before the full-scale invasion, Ukraine understood that achieving military parity with Russia was impossible,” Kuzan added. “As a result, the navy had to be built according to an asymmetric principle.”

An Ongoing Adaptation Cycle

As Ukraine continued to strike Russian ships and deploy drone carriers to extend operational range, Moscow was forced into repeated adaptation, constantly trying to figure out how to defend itself from Ukrainian unmanned systems.

According to “Xen,” a former U.S. special forces operator, who has worked with a Ukrainian Special Operations Forces regiment, the adaptation cycle now typically runs six weeks to six months, including for Ukrainian naval drones: a new tactic creates disruption, countermeasures follow, and are then met by rapid counters of their own. The result is a sustained cat-and-mouse dynamic that permanently alters tactics, techniques, and procedures once used with relative impunity.

Earlier analysis from the Center for Maritime Strategy suggested that Ukraine’s maritime campaign would aim first to force Russian naval assets out of Crimea and then to constrain their operations elsewhere in the Black Sea. That shift has now largely occurred.

With much of the fleet now confined to Novorossiysk, Ukrainian forces are probing for weaknesses and striking launch platforms directly, exploiting basing constraints to reduce Russia’s ability to bombard Ukrainian cities. The Kremlin will inevitably seek new countermeasures, while Kyiv moves to sustain the adaptation cycle that has kept Russian naval operations under constant pressure.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidkirichenko/2025/12/15/ukraine-says-it-disabled-a-russian-submarine-with-an-underwater-drone/

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.004012
$0.004012$0.004012
-1.13%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime

The post SOLANA NETWORK Withstands 6 Tbps DDoS Without Downtime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a pivotal week for crypto infrastructure, the Solana network
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/16 20:44
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41