TLDR: KURV proposes XRP income ETF using options to generate yield, not spot or leverage exposure Filing follows live CME XRP derivatives, showing market infrastructureTLDR: KURV proposes XRP income ETF using options to generate yield, not spot or leverage exposure Filing follows live CME XRP derivatives, showing market infrastructure

KURV Files XRP Income ETF as Market Shows Growing Risk Tolerance

TLDR:

  • KURV proposes XRP income ETF using options to generate yield, not spot or leverage exposure
  • Filing follows live CME XRP derivatives, showing market infrastructure maturity and reliability
  • Regulatory silence indicates growing confidence in structured XRP products and risk handling
  • Parallel leveraged and income ETFs show XRP is now treated as a tradable asset, not experimental

XRP ETF developments took a quieter turn after a new filing surfaced at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 

On December 19, KURV ETF Trust submitted a post-effective Form N-1A amendment covering a proposed XRP-linked income product. 

The filing arrived without market noise or regulatory pushback. It did not introduce spot exposure or leverage. Instead, it signaled a structured approach centered on derivatives, risk controls, and cash-flow generation within existing market frameworks.

Options-Based XRP Exposure Moves Forward

The filing introduced the KURV XRP Enhanced Income ETF, paired with a similar Ether product. This structure relies on options strategies tied to XRP pricing. 

The product design targets yield generation rather than direct price tracking. It positions XRP as an asset suitable for volatility selling, not speculative accumulation.

Market observers referenced commentary shared on X by SonOfaRichard, who framed the filing as procedural yet meaningful. The tweet emphasized that income products rely on dependable derivatives markets. 

Options strategies require stable pricing references and reliable clearing. These assumptions reflect a measured shift in how XRP exposure is being packaged.

This approach contrasts with earlier XRP filings that faced resistance. Several leveraged XRP products appeared weeks earlier but failed to advance. Regulators showed limited tolerance for amplified risk during that period. 

The KURV filing followed a different path, emphasizing controlled exposure and operational maturity.

Risk Tolerance Signals Shift Across XRP Products

Timing played a central role in how the filing was received. CME-listed XRP derivatives had already gone live before the KURV amendment. 

That sequence established pricing benchmarks and settlement infrastructure. Income products typically follow once these systems demonstrate resilience under live trading conditions.

Additional context emerged alongside filings from GraniteShares for ±3x XRP ETFs. Those leveraged products are set effective December 30. 

Their approval indicated growing comfort with XRP volatility. Income ETFs extend that acceptance by treating volatility as a source of return.

The absence of objections carried weight among professional observers. No stop orders or public resistance followed the filing. As noted in the referenced tweet, regulatory silence often reflects procedural acceptance. 

Attention has now shifted toward open interest, clearing activity, and counterparties such as Hidden Road, rather than headline price movements.

The post KURV Files XRP Income ETF as Market Shows Growing Risk Tolerance appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
XRP Logo
XRP Price(XRP)
$1,9286
$1,9286$1,9286
+%2,84
USD
XRP (XRP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case

Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case

The post Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A prominent Zimbabwean eye specialist is demanding
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 20:59
Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold

Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold

The post Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 21:10