BlackRock Bitcoin ETF provided one of the strongest ETF performances of the year 2025, despite falling Bitcoin prices. The iShares Bitcoin Trust, IBIT, accumulatedBlackRock Bitcoin ETF provided one of the strongest ETF performances of the year 2025, despite falling Bitcoin prices. The iShares Bitcoin Trust, IBIT, accumulated

Bitcoin ETF by BlackRock Draws Billions in 2025 Despite Price Decline

  • BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF drew $25B in inflows despite negative Bitcoin returns.
  • IBIT ranked sixth in global ETF inflows while being the only top fund with losses.
  • On-chain data shows new large investors accumulating Bitcoin during price declines.

BlackRock Bitcoin ETF provided one of the strongest ETF performances of the year 2025, despite falling Bitcoin prices. The iShares Bitcoin Trust, IBIT, accumulated over $25 billion in net inflows last year. Bitcoin closed the period sharply down. The lack of price and investor demand correlation is a clear indication of a change in the utilization of bitcoin exposure.

According to Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas, IBIT was ranked sixth on the global ETF inflow leaderboard. It was the sole ETF in the best-ranked funds to record negative annual returns. Other popular ETFs had the advantage of increasing equities or commodity gains. IBIT raised capital irrespective of the unfavorable market conditions.

According to Balchunas, investors tend to overreact to short-term price fluctuations. He stated that capital flows are much more indicative of conviction. According to him, consistent inflows demonstrate faith in the long-term functionality of BTC. Such reasoning now seems to be influencing the demand in ETFs.

Bitcoin ETFs Draw More Capital Than Gold in 2025

Strategy, headed by Michael Saylor, purchased additional BTC in the most recent pullback in the market. The company did not stop buying when the prices fell. The purchases are accumulative but not speculative.

Bitcoin ETFs also had an edge over gold-backed funds in terms of new capital inflows. The price of gold increased by over 60% in the year. Nonetheless, large gold ETFs, including SPDR Gold Shares, attracted fewer funds compared to Bitcoin ETFs. The comparison indicates that BTC is no longer viewed as a short-term trade by investors.

Certain conservative companies are reserved. Previously, Vanguard has characterized BTC as a toy. However, it continues to trade BTC ETFs on its platform. That ruling underscores increasing demand by investors to have regulated access.

Also Read: HYPE Faces Collapse or Surge: Key $20 Level Under Pressure

This trend has revolved around the influence of BlackRock. Its brand and distribution presence ease tension amongst conventional investors. These influences make it easier for investors to gain cryptocurrency exposure through established mechanisms. Consequently, it appears that ETF inflows are less vulnerable to day-to-day price variation.

Realized Capital Shifts Toward New BTC Investors

On-chain analytics indicate underlying transformations within the BTC market. CryptoQuant data shows that newly introduced large holders now own almost 50% of the realized capitalization of BTC. These consumers came in at higher prices. They are currently defining the cost base of BTC.

Realized capitalization monitors the inflow of capital into the network as a whole and not the long-term holdings. As prices fell recently, the proportion of large new investors kept increasing. This trend is a sign of accumulating weakness.

The data points out that BTC is in a re-anchoring stage. Shareholders seem to be interested in long-term prospects. The short-term rallies are not as important as long-term exposure. As Balchunas wrote, when Bitcoin ETFs can attract billions in a bad year, better markets can show an even bigger demand.

Also Read: Spot Bitcoin ETFs post $457M inflows amid early positioning push

Market Opportunity
Intuition Logo
Intuition Price(TRUST)
$0,1055
$0,1055$0,1055
-0,47%
USD
Intuition (TRUST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework

Coinbase Payments has joined the Open Intents Framework as a core contributor, working alongside Ethereum Foundation and other major players. The initiative aims to simplify complex multi-chain interactions through automated solver technology. The post Coinbase Joins Ethereum Foundation to Back Open Intents Framework appeared first on Coinspeaker.
Share
Coinspeaker2025/09/18 02:43
Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment

The post Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing A New Era Of Seller Empowerment Skip to content Home AI News Amazon AI Agent: Unleashing a New Era of Seller Empowerment Source: https://bitcoinworld.co.in/amazon-ai-seller-tools/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:10