Reveel’s 2026 GRI and Surcharge Survival Guide Finds Carriers Shifting Cost Increases From Annual to Incremental Through Surcharges, Rules, and Mid-Year ChangesReveel’s 2026 GRI and Surcharge Survival Guide Finds Carriers Shifting Cost Increases From Annual to Incremental Through Surcharges, Rules, and Mid-Year Changes

FedEx and UPS 2026 GRIs Signal Pricing Restraint — But Parcel Shippers Face a More Complex Cost Reality

Reveel’s 2026 GRI and Surcharge Survival Guide Finds Carriers Shifting Cost Increases From Annual to Incremental Through Surcharges, Rules, and Mid-Year Changes

IRVINE, Calif., Dec. 22, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Reveel™, the only Shipping Intelligence™ Platform with Parcel Spend Management 2.0 (PSM 2.0) technology, today announced the availability of its 2026 General Rate Increase (GRI) & Surcharge Survival Guide, a comprehensive analysis of the latest pricing changes from FedEx and UPS. The report finds that while both carriers announced a 5.9% average rate increase for 2026 — the true cost impact for shippers continues to be shaped by a broader, more dynamic pricing strategy that extends well beyond the annual GRI.

After several years in which actual shipper costs significantly outpaced the highly-publicized carrier GRIs, Reveel’s modeling shows a rare alignment in 2026 between the headline increase and the expected real-world impact. For many shippers, the 5.9% GRI is closer to what will actually be felt; not because carriers are easing pricing pressure, but because much of that pressure was applied earlier through fuel surcharge changes, revised accessorial definitions, and incremental pricing actions that were applied throughout the 2025 calendar year.

“For the first time in years, the true impact of the 2026 GRIs looks relatively reasonable, at least on the surface — but that doesn’t mean shipping costs are suddenly easier to manage,” said Josh Dunham, CEO and co-founder of Reveel. “Carriers have fundamentally changed how and when they apply pricing pressure. The once-a-year, headline-making GRI increase matters less than the dozens of smaller adjustments that now happen throughout the year with little or no warning. Shippers who only review rates once a year will be in for an unpleasant surprise.”

Key Findings From the 2026 GRI Analysis
Reveel’s analysis highlights several important themes shaping carrier pricing in 2026. The biggest being that the shift from annual to incremental increases is in full swing. The GRI is becoming more predictable on paper, while pricing power is increasingly exercised through targeted, data-driven adjustments that arrive quietly and continuously.

  • GRIs Align More Closely With Modeled Impact — Reveel’s analysis shows that this year, the announced GRIs closely match what the true impact will be to shippers. In past years, the true impact of the increases was much higher than the rate announced. But now, because of the year-long incremental fees and increases, the impact is closer to the disclosed rate.
    • UPS: 5.9% announced increase; 5.8% modeled impact
    • FedEx: 5.9% announced increase; 6.1% modeled impact
  • Accessorials Continue to Drive Surprise Costs — Address correction fees, delivery area surcharges, fuel mechanics, and new dimensional criteria are increasingly shaping total spend, and they’re all added or adjusted outside of the traditional GRI window.
  • Large and Bulky Package Increases are Moderate — Charges for Additional Handling, Oversize, and Large Package shipments, which jumped 15-20% or more in recent years, only increased by a more measured 6-10% in 2026.
  • Ground and Residential Shipments Remain a Primary Target — Both carriers increased ground residential rates at levels above the published GRI, underscoring their continued focus on yield improvement in high-volume, residential-heavy segments.
  • Carrier Strategies are Diverging — While overall increase levels remain similar, FedEx and UPS are no longer moving in lockstep. FedEx applied more uniform increases across services and zones, with emphasis on Ground, Home Delivery, and Priority Overnight. UPS placed greater pressure on lighter-weight shipments (1–5 lbs.), while showing relative restraint on heavier packages.

“Accessorial creep is now the single biggest source of pricing volatility for most shippers,” added Dunham. “Fees tied to things like address accuracy, package dimensions, residential delivery, and fuel are not only increasing — they’re becoming more conditional and more frequent. These changes rarely make headlines, but they’re now what pushes shipping costs well beyond expectations and it has never been more important for shippers to actively monitor such variables at all times.”

What Shippers Should Expect in 2026
The 2026 GRI marks an inflection point in how carriers use pricing. Rather than relying on a single, outsized annual increase, FedEx and UPS are using pricing as a precision tool, concentrating increases where they align with their business priorities, margin goals, and shipment profiles.

Reveel always cautions shippers against relying solely on headline GRI percentages when planning, but that will be even more important in 2026. The true impact of increasing rates, fees and surcharges depends more than ever on variables such as weight, zones, service mixes, surcharge exposures, and even packaging decisions. Shippers who understand those variables and set themselves up for success by monitoring them continuously will be best positioned to control costs.

Reveel’s Parcel Shipping Intelligence Platform is designed to make carrier pricing mechanics transparent, actionable, and measurable. Through detailed impact analysis, simulation, and modeling, the guide helps shippers evaluate contract alternatives, operational changes, and carrier mix decisions before costs appear on an invoice.

With mid-year pricing changes becoming the norm, successful cost management now depends on real-time clarity, not retrospective analysis.

The Reveel 2026 General Rate Increase (GRI) & Surcharge Survival Guide is available now. To access the full report and analysis, please click here.

About Reveel
Reveel is the leading Parcel Shipping Intelligence™ platform, revolutionizing the way businesses manage their shipping expenses and navigate the complexities of modern logistics. Through its advanced Parcel Spend Management (PSM) 2.0 technology, the company empowers shippers with real-time visibility, actionable insights, and enhanced control over shipping costs and carrier performance. With over $8 billion in parcel spend under management, Reveel combines more than 17 years of agreement management expertise with cutting-edge, AI-driven solutions to foster a culture of innovation across the parcel shipping industry. From optimizing carrier contracts to automating complex processes and driving data-driven decisions, Reveel sets the standard for transparency and efficiency, while providing the flexibility and scalability needed for future growth. For more information, please visit the company’s website and follow it on X, LinkedIn and Facebook.

Media Contact:
Jeff Drew
Guyer Group for Reveel
P: 617.233.5109
E: reveel@guyergroup.com

Cision View original content:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fedex-and-ups-2026-gris-signal-pricing-restraint–but-parcel-shippers-face-a-more-complex-cost-reality-302647663.html

SOURCE Reveel

Market Opportunity
Moonveil Logo
Moonveil Price(MORE)
$0.002413
$0.002413$0.002413
+0.70%
USD
Moonveil (MORE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Coinbase Premium Turns Negative Amid Asian Buying Surge

U.S. Coinbase Premium Turns Negative Amid Asian Buying Surge

U.S. institutional demand falls as Asian markets buy Bitcoin dips, causing negative Coinbase premium.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/23 14:20
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar

USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar

The post USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. USD/JPY climbs to near 148.30 as Fed’s Powell didn’t endorse aggressive dovish stance. Fed’s Powell warns of slowing job demand and upside inflation risks. Japan’s Jibun Bank Manufacturing PMI declines at a faster pace in September. The USD/JPY pair trades 0.45% higher to near 148.30 during the European trading session on Wednesday. The pair gains sharply as the US Dollar (USD) outperforms a majority of its peers, following comments from Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Jerome Powell that the central bank needs to be cautious on further interest rate cuts. During the press time, the US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the Greenback’s value against six major currencies, rises almost 0.4% to near 97.60. The USD Index resumes its upside journey after a two-day corrective move. On Tuesday, Fed’s Powell stated at the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce that the upside inflation risks and labor market concerns have posed a challenging situation for the central bank, which is prompting officials to exercise caution on further monetary policy easing. Powell also stated that the current interest rate range is “well positioned to respond to potential economic developments”. Fed Powell’s comments were similar to statements from Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic, and Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack who stated on Monday that the central bank needs to cautious over unwinding monetary policy restrictiveness further, citing persistent inflation risks. Going forward, investors will focus on the US Durable Goods Orders and Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index (PCE) data for August, which will be released on Thursday and Friday, respectively. In Japan, the manufacturing business activity has declined again in September. Preliminary Jibun Bank Manufacturing PMI data came in lower at 48.4 against 49.7 in August. Economists had anticipated the Manufacturing PMI to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/25 01:31