Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a critical element in the email authentication ecosystem. An SPF record, published as a DNS TXT record, authorizes specific IP Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a critical element in the email authentication ecosystem. An SPF record, published as a DNS TXT record, authorizes specific IP

What Is SPF Flattening? A Complete Guide To Flattening Your SPF Records

Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a critical element in the email authentication ecosystem. An SPF record, published as a DNS TXT record, authorizes specific IP addresses to send emails on behalf of your domain. This mechanism helps prevent email spoofing by allowing recipient email servers to verify that incoming messages come from permitted sources.

The Anatomy of an SPF Record

An SPF record contains mechanisms like `a`, `mx`, `include`, and `redirect` terms. These mechanisms help define which servers or services are allowed to send on your behalf. The `a` and `mx` mechanisms reference the domain’s A or MX DNS records, while `include` allows domains to delegate authentication to other domains—for instance, including sales._spf.example.com or support._spf.example.com if you use external senders.

The 10 DNS Lookup Limit

Despite its utility, the SPF framework has a crucial constraint: a maximum of 10 DNS lookups per SPF evaluation. Every external reference in your SPF record—such as an `include` directive or a `redirect` term—triggers a DNS lookup. Once this 10 DNS lookup limit is exceeded, the SPF validation process fails, leading to SPF failures. This can negatively impact your email deliverability, with legitimate messages being rejected or filtered as spam.

The widespread use of multiple cloud-based email services increases the complexity of SPF records. Using several `include` terms—such as for Salesforce, Mailchimp, Microsoft 365, or Google Workspace—quickly exhausts your DNS query budget.

Additional Limitations: Void Lookups and DNS Record Length

Beyond the lookup cap, SPF records also face DNS record length limitations. Exceeding 255 characters in a single string or a total record length beyond DNS protocol limits can cause SPF validation errors. Void lookups—in which a referenced record returns no result—also count against the 10 DNS lookup limit, increasing the risk of SPF failures during evaluation.

What Is SPF Flattening and Why Is It Needed?

SPF flattening is the process of converting complex SPF records containing nested `include` terms and indirect lookups into a simplified list of direct IP addresses. A flattened SPF record replaces most or all `include`, `a`, `mx`, and `redirect` mechanisms with explicit IP addresses. This process is critical to ensure compliance with the 10 DNS lookup limit and avoid SPF failures that affect email deliverability.

Why Is SPF Flattening Necessary?

Organizations relying on multiple email services often exceed the SPF lookup threshold. When this happens, SPF validation results in a “permerror” (permanent error), causing legitimate emails to fail authentication checks. As a result, email deliverability is compromised, and recipients may never receive important communications.

SPF flattening addresses these challenges by generating a flattened SPF record that expands all relevant references into a direct IP list. This not only reduces the maintenance burden associated with root-cause analysis of SPF issues but also ensures SPF compliance as recommended by email security vendors and industry standards like DMARC.

Flattening vs. Splitting SPF Records

Some organizations attempt to split SPF records or use SPF macros to stay within limits. However, split SPF records are generally discouraged, as domains can only publish a single SPF record. Using SPF macros or a macro-based solution may also introduce complexity and incompatibility with some email servers. Flattening is a more robust approach, especially with automation via third-party services like AutoSPF, DMARC Duty, or Dynamic SPF solution providers.

How SPF Flattener Tools Work

SPF flattener tools automate the process of resolving all `a`, `mx`, `include`, and `redirect` terms in your SPF record to their underlying IP addresses. They produce a flattened SPF record that minimizes DNS lookups during SPF evaluation, ensuring reliable SPF passes and optimal email deliverability.

Core Functionality of SPF Flattener Tools

  • Deep Parsing: The SPF tool recursively examines all domains in include terms, a, mx, and redirect terms.
  • DNS Resolution: The tool fetches the current IP list associated with each term.
  • Record Synthesis: It generates a single SPF record composed almost exclusively of `ip4` and `ip6` mechanisms.
  • Automation and Updating: Advanced solutions (like Dynamic SPF or AutoSPF for Enterprise) automate the ongoing SPF updating process, alerting users when an outdated SPF record needs to be re-flattened.

Many providers offer automatic SPF flattening, either as a free SPF flattening tool or as part of a broader email security suite. Solutions like AutoSPF integrate with the AutoSPF dashboard and can be scaled for IT departments via AutoSPF for SMBs and Enterprise, while partner programs offer support for resellers and MSPs.

Step-by-Step Guide to Flattening Your SPF Record

Flattening your SPF record can be done manually or by leveraging specialized SPF management automation tools. Below is a general step-by-step approach:

1. Assess Your Current SPF Record

  • Retrieve your existing SPF record using a trusted SPF checker or SPF validation tool.
  • Identify all `include`, `a`, `mx`, and `redirect` terms.

2. Expand All References

  • For each `include` domain (e.g., sales._spf.example.com, support._spf.example.com), retrieve its current SPF record and extract all relevant IP addresses.
  • Resolve all `a` and `mx` mechanisms to their respective IP addresses using DNS lookups.
  • If using `redirect`, resolve that record as well.

3. Compile the Full IP List

  • Collect all IP addresses found in the earlier step and ensure you avoid duplication.
  • Consider any IPs added or changed by your business-email.service or integrated email platforms since the last flattening.

4. Construct the Flattened SPF Record

  • Synthesize your SPF record using only the necessary `ip4` and `ip6` mechanisms, minimizing or eliminating additional DNS lookups.
  • Confirm your record does not exceed DNS record length limitation (generally less than 512 characters per TXT record).

5. Update DNS and Test

  • Publish the flattened SPF record in your DNS as the new TXT entry.
  • Use an SPF checker to validate SPF compliance and successful SPF passes.
  • Monitor SPF evaluation results for void lookups or SPF failures.

6. Automate Ongoing Maintenance

  • Consider leveraging a Dynamic SPF solution or third-party managed SPF service (like DMARC Duty or AutoSPF) to continually monitor, re-flatten, and maintain your SPF record.
  • Automation mitigates risks from outdated SPF record configurations whenever your email services shift IP addresses or update their infrastructure.

Best Practices and Potential Pitfalls When Flattening SPF Records

Flattening SPF records is not without its challenges. While it powerfully mitigates the DNS lookup limitation, it introduces new maintenance considerations.

Best Practices for Effective SPF Flattening

  • Regular SPF Updating: Re-flatten your SPF record whenever you add or remove email services, as the underlying IP list can change frequently.
  • Monitor Provider Changes: Be aware that your business-email.service provider may update their sending IPs without notice. Use automation or periodic checks to catch these changes.
  • Leverage Tools and Automation: Use trusted SPF tools—such as AutoSPF, DMARC Duty, or Dynamic SPF solution providers—for automatic SPF flattening and compliance monitoring.
  • Combine With DMARC and DKIM: SPF alone is not sufficient for comprehensive email protection. Deploy DMARC and DKIM alongside your flattened SPF record for robust authentication.

Potential Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

IP Obsolescence and Outdated SPF Records

Using a static flattened SPF record can quickly lead to SPF failures as email services update their infrastructure. Automation and regular reviews via the AutoSPF dashboard or similar tools help avoid the maintenance burden of manual checks.

DNS Record Length Limitation

Flattening can lead to overly long SPF records if too many IP addresses are included. This can cause DNS issues or invalid records. Always use an SPF checker to validate after each change.

Provider-Specific Pitfalls

Some email security vendors, such as those offering Dynamic SPF or macro-based solutions, use unique approaches. Evaluate third-party service compatibility and ensure you are not inadvertently splitting SPF records, which violates SPF compliance rules.

Neglecting Void Lookups

An improperly flattened SPF record may still reference domains that yield void lookups, hindering SPF passes. Use automated monitoring to detect and fix SPF record gaps.

Staying Current

SPF flattening is not a one-time project. As email servers and services change, ongoing SPF management using automation tools—such as Dynamic SPF solutions, AutoSPF for SMBs, or the AutoSPF Partner Program—ensures your domain remains SPF compliant and maximizes email deliverability.

If you encounter persistent SPF issues or complex integrations, contact your SPF flattener provider’s support (Get Support) or schedule an expert review (Book A Demo) to modernize your email authentication strategy. Review About Us resources for more on the latest SPF management capabilities.

Read More From Techbullion

Comments
Market Opportunity
Tx24 Logo
Tx24 Price(TXT)
$0.00467
$0.00467$0.00467
+3.54%
USD
Tx24 (TXT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

The post Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X account @SaniExp, which belongs to the founder of the Timechain Index explorer, has published data showing that a dormant BTC wallet was activated after hibernating for six years. However, it was set up 13 years ago, according to the tweet — the time when Satoshi Nakamoto’s shadow was still casting itself around, so to speak. The X post states that the tweet belongs to infamous early Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, which suffered from a major hack in the early 2010s, and last year it began paying out compensation to clients who lost their crypto in that hack. The deadline was eventually extended to October 2025. Mt. Gox’s wallet with 1,000 BTC reactivated The above-mentioned data source shared a screenshot from the Timechain Index explorer, showing multiple transactions marked as confirmed and moving a total of 1,000 Bitcoins. This amount of crypto is valued at $116,195,100 at the time of the initiated transaction. Last year, Mt. Gox began to move the remains of its gargantuan funds to pay out compensations to its creditors. Earlier this year, it also made several massive transactions to partner exchanges to distribute funds to Mt. Gox investors. All of the compensations were promised to be paid out by Oct. 31, 2025. The aforementioned transaction is likely preparation for another payout. The exchange was hacked for several years due to multiple unnoticed security breaches, and in 2014, when the site went offline, 744,408 Bitcoins were reported stolen. Source: https://u.today/satoshi-era-mtgoxs-1000-bitcoin-wallet-suddenly-reactivated
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 10:18
lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05
Ripple CTO Explains How The XRP Ledger ‘Will Take Over The World’

Ripple CTO Explains How The XRP Ledger ‘Will Take Over The World’

On a Token Relations webinar for the XRP ecosystem on Dec. 20, Ripple CTO David Schwartz was asked the sort of question that usually produces a tidy dashboard answer
Share
Bitcoinist2025/12/24 06:00