The post Searching for the Next Altcoin? These Two Projects Stand Out appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Crypto research platform Altcoin Buzz has releasedThe post Searching for the Next Altcoin? These Two Projects Stand Out appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Crypto research platform Altcoin Buzz has released

Searching for the Next Altcoin? These Two Projects Stand Out

altcoins

The post Searching for the Next Altcoin? These Two Projects Stand Out appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Crypto research platform Altcoin Buzz has released a side-by-side comparison of two popular altcoins, Bittensor (TAO) and Hedera Hashgraph (HBAR), aiming to help investors choose just one in a market where capital is limited.

The idea behind the comparison is straightforward. With many crypto assets trading at discounted prices, investors often do not have enough funds to buy everything. Instead of recommending both projects, the expert decided to make a clear choice by directly comparing the two across factors.

Decentralization Sets The First Major Difference

Bittensor is described as one of the most decentralized networks in the crypto space, nearly comparable to Bitcoin. There are no special privileges, insider advantages, or corporate control. Subnets compete constantly, encouraging innovation and efficiency.

Hedera, by contrast, operates as a permissioned network. It is governed by a council made up of large global companies such as Google and IBM. Only approved organizations can become validators, and applications must go through Hedera’s governance process. While this structure appeals to enterprises, it limits open participation.

Because of this, Altcoin Buzz gave Bittensor a clear edge on decentralization.

When it comes to growth and revenue, Bittensor again stood out. The network currently generates about $78,000 per day, or roughly $28 million per year. Hedera’s network revenue for 2025 is estimated closer to $5 million, following a slower first quarter.

Bittensor also has a smaller market value, around $2 billion, compared to Hedera’s roughly $4.5 billion. This makes TAO appear more undervalued relative to its revenue.

Hedera earned a win in compatibility and access. It is EVM-compatible, making it easy to use with common wallets and apps. Bittensor requires Polkadot-compatible wallets, which adds friction for new users.

Final Verdict

After weighing all factors, Altcoin Buzz narrowly chose Bittensor as the better single pick. The decision was driven by stronger decentralization, higher revenue relative to valuation, and long-term confidence in crypto AI.

Market Opportunity
Hive AI Logo
Hive AI Price(BUZZ)
$0.00119
$0.00119$0.00119
-1.24%
USD
Hive AI (BUZZ) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

The post Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X account @SaniExp, which belongs to the founder of the Timechain Index explorer, has published data showing that a dormant BTC wallet was activated after hibernating for six years. However, it was set up 13 years ago, according to the tweet — the time when Satoshi Nakamoto’s shadow was still casting itself around, so to speak. The X post states that the tweet belongs to infamous early Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, which suffered from a major hack in the early 2010s, and last year it began paying out compensation to clients who lost their crypto in that hack. The deadline was eventually extended to October 2025. Mt. Gox’s wallet with 1,000 BTC reactivated The above-mentioned data source shared a screenshot from the Timechain Index explorer, showing multiple transactions marked as confirmed and moving a total of 1,000 Bitcoins. This amount of crypto is valued at $116,195,100 at the time of the initiated transaction. Last year, Mt. Gox began to move the remains of its gargantuan funds to pay out compensations to its creditors. Earlier this year, it also made several massive transactions to partner exchanges to distribute funds to Mt. Gox investors. All of the compensations were promised to be paid out by Oct. 31, 2025. The aforementioned transaction is likely preparation for another payout. The exchange was hacked for several years due to multiple unnoticed security breaches, and in 2014, when the site went offline, 744,408 Bitcoins were reported stolen. Source: https://u.today/satoshi-era-mtgoxs-1000-bitcoin-wallet-suddenly-reactivated
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 10:18
lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05
Ripple CTO Explains How The XRP Ledger ‘Will Take Over The World’

Ripple CTO Explains How The XRP Ledger ‘Will Take Over The World’

On a Token Relations webinar for the XRP ecosystem on Dec. 20, Ripple CTO David Schwartz was asked the sort of question that usually produces a tidy dashboard answer
Share
Bitcoinist2025/12/24 06:00