The post Crypto Hacks Drop in 2025 as Scams Target Bitcoin Savings via Phishing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto hacks in 2025 resulted in $3.3 billionThe post Crypto Hacks Drop in 2025 as Scams Target Bitcoin Savings via Phishing appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto hacks in 2025 resulted in $3.3 billion

Crypto Hacks Drop in 2025 as Scams Target Bitcoin Savings via Phishing

  • Supply-chain attacks led losses with $1.45 billion from just two incidents, including the major Bybit hack.

  • Phishing scams ranked second, causing $722 million in damages across 248 cases amid rising threats like pig butchering tactics.

  • Security incidents fell by 162 year-over-year, signaling improved protocol defenses despite a 66% rise in average theft to $5.3 million.

Crypto hacks 2025: Discover how losses hit $3.3B amid fewer but deadlier attacks. Learn key trends in supply-chain exploits and phishing risks—stay secure in evolving threats today.

Crypto hacks 2025 saw total losses reach $3.3 billion, a significant figure driven by fewer but more targeted incidents as blockchain security advanced. According to data from blockchain security firm CertiK, the decline in attack numbers reflects stronger protocol protections, forcing hackers toward complex methods like supply-chain breaches and phishing. This shift highlights the crypto space’s maturing defenses against traditional vulnerabilities.

How Have Supply-Chain Attacks Evolved in Crypto Security 2025?

Supply-chain attacks emerged as the dominant threat in crypto security 2025, accounting for $1.45 billion in losses from only two major incidents. The Bybit hack in February alone caused $1.4 billion in damages, underscoring the vulnerability of infrastructure providers. CertiK’s analysis indicates that well-resourced threat actors are increasingly targeting these points, with incidents dropping in volume but rising in sophistication and impact.

Overall security incidents decreased by 162 counts compared to the prior year, a clear sign that foundational blockchain measures are bolstering resilience. However, the average loss per hack climbed 66% to $5.3 million, while the median theft fell 35.75% to $103,966, showing that outliers like supply-chain exploits skew the data. As attackers adapt, experts predict a surge in coordinated efforts against ecosystem infrastructure.


Crypto hacks by amount and incident, yearly chart. Source: CertiK

Soulja Boy token sparks backlash after Base co-founder posts purchase receipt

The evolving landscape of crypto hacks 2025 demonstrates that while code vulnerabilities are waning, attackers are pivoting to higher-stakes operations. Blockchain analytics from firms like CertiK emphasize the need for comprehensive supply-chain audits to mitigate these risks effectively.


Crypto hacks by incident type and amount of losses, one-year chart. Source: CertiK

Solana AI token Ava hit by launch sniping tied to deployer: Bubblemaps

Frequently Asked Questions

What Caused the $3.3 Billion in Crypto Hacks 2025?

In 2025, crypto hacks totaled $3.3 billion in losses, primarily from advanced supply-chain exploits and phishing schemes as basic vulnerabilities declined. CertiK reports highlight two massive incidents driving most damages, with improved security reducing overall attack frequency by over 162 cases year-over-year, focusing threats on high-value targets.

Why Are Pig Butchering Scams Rising in the Crypto Space?

Pig butchering scams, a sophisticated form of phishing, are gaining traction because they exploit emotional trust over time, leading to massive crypto transfers. Victims often face grooming periods from one week to three months, resulting in $722 million lost across 248 incidents in 2025, per Cyvers data, as scammers blend AI tools with prolonged manipulation.

Key Takeaways

  • Declining Incidents Signal Progress: Security improvements cut hack counts by 162, but losses concentrated in sophisticated attacks like the Bybit incident.
  • Supply-Chain Vulnerabilities Dominate: These breaches caused $1.45 billion in damages, urging infrastructure providers to enhance defenses against coordinated threats.
  • Phishing and Scams Persist: With $722 million stolen via tactics like pig butchering, users should verify sources and enable multi-factor authentication for protection.

Conclusion

The trends in crypto hacks 2025 reveal a resilient ecosystem where protocol-level security has curbed simple exploits, yet supply-chain attacks and phishing scams like pig butchering pose escalating dangers, totaling $3.3 billion in losses. As blockchain firms such as CertiK continue to track these shifts, investors must prioritize vigilant practices to safeguard assets. Looking ahead, adopting robust verification and auditing could further fortify the space against emerging threats—act now to stay ahead.

Concerns about code vulnerabilities are fading in the crypto space, but more sophisticated scam tactics are emerging as protocol security improves.

Crypto hackers stole $3.3 billion in 2025, but the number of attacks fell sharply as losses became concentrated in fewer, more sophisticated supply-chain exploits, according to new data from blockchain security firm CertiK shared with Cointelegraph.

While total losses remained elevated, the decline in incident counts and a drop in median theft sizes suggest that protocol-level security is improving, pushing attackers away from simple code vulnerabilities and toward phishing and infrastructure-level attacks.

CertiK said supply-chain breaches emerged as the most damaging threat, accounting for $1.45 billion in losses across just two incidents, including the $1.4 billion Bybit hack in February.

“The Bybit exploit signals that well-capitalized, well-coordinated threat actors are becoming more active across the ecosystem,” the report said, predicting a rise in the “sophistication” of supply chain attacks as attackers target more infrastructure providers.


Pig butchering victim stats, grooming time. Source: Cyvers

Pig butchering scams are a subset of phishing scams that cost the industry a collective $5.5 billion in 2024, across 200,000 individual cases.

Notably, the average grooming period for victims is between one and two weeks in 35% of cases, while 10% of scams involve grooming periods of up to three months, according to blockchain security platform Cyvers.

In June, the US Department of Justice announced the seizure of over $225 million in crypto linked to pig butchering scams.

Magazine: Coinbase hack shows the law probably won’t protect you — Here’s why

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/crypto-hacks-drop-in-2025-as-scams-target-bitcoin-savings-via-phishing

Market Opportunity
Octavia Logo
Octavia Price(VIA)
$0.0098
$0.0098$0.0098
0.00%
USD
Octavia (VIA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

The post Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X account @SaniExp, which belongs to the founder of the Timechain Index explorer, has published data showing that a dormant BTC wallet was activated after hibernating for six years. However, it was set up 13 years ago, according to the tweet — the time when Satoshi Nakamoto’s shadow was still casting itself around, so to speak. The X post states that the tweet belongs to infamous early Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, which suffered from a major hack in the early 2010s, and last year it began paying out compensation to clients who lost their crypto in that hack. The deadline was eventually extended to October 2025. Mt. Gox’s wallet with 1,000 BTC reactivated The above-mentioned data source shared a screenshot from the Timechain Index explorer, showing multiple transactions marked as confirmed and moving a total of 1,000 Bitcoins. This amount of crypto is valued at $116,195,100 at the time of the initiated transaction. Last year, Mt. Gox began to move the remains of its gargantuan funds to pay out compensations to its creditors. Earlier this year, it also made several massive transactions to partner exchanges to distribute funds to Mt. Gox investors. All of the compensations were promised to be paid out by Oct. 31, 2025. The aforementioned transaction is likely preparation for another payout. The exchange was hacked for several years due to multiple unnoticed security breaches, and in 2014, when the site went offline, 744,408 Bitcoins were reported stolen. Source: https://u.today/satoshi-era-mtgoxs-1000-bitcoin-wallet-suddenly-reactivated
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 10:18
lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05
Ripple CTO Explains How The XRP Ledger ‘Will Take Over The World’

Ripple CTO Explains How The XRP Ledger ‘Will Take Over The World’

On a Token Relations webinar for the XRP ecosystem on Dec. 20, Ripple CTO David Schwartz was asked the sort of question that usually produces a tidy dashboard answer
Share
Bitcoinist2025/12/24 06:00