The post Curve Governance Vote Rejects CRV Grant for Swiss Stake appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Curve DAO blocks $6.2M CRV grant as majority vote turns againstThe post Curve Governance Vote Rejects CRV Grant for Swiss Stake appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Curve DAO blocks $6.2M CRV grant as majority vote turns against

Curve Governance Vote Rejects CRV Grant for Swiss Stake

  • Curve DAO blocks $6.2M CRV grant as majority vote turns against core team funding proposal.
  • Yearn and Convex-linked wallets drive nearly 90% of votes opposing the Curve development grant.
  • CRV price rises despite rejection as tokenholders push for tighter funding scrutiny.

The Curve DAO has rejected a governance proposal that would have allocated 17.4 million CRV tokens, valued at about $6.2 million, to the decentralized exchange’s core development team. The decision followed a vote that raised ongoing questions around governance structure, funding transparency, and the concentration of voting power within major DeFi protocols.

The proposal was submitted by Michael Egorov, founder of Curve Finance. It sought approval for a CRV token grant to Swiss Stake AG, the firm that oversees Curve’s core development and is managed by Egorov. According to the proposal, the funding was intended to support software development, infrastructure, security work, and broader ecosystem maintenance.

Swiss Stake employs roughly 25 contributors working on Curve, which is currently the third-largest decentralized exchange in DeFi, with more than $2.1 billion in total value locked, based on data from DeFiLlama.

Voting Outcome and Influence of Large Holders

When voting concluded, 54.46% of participating tokenholders opposed the proposal, while 45.54% voted in favor. On-chain voting data showed that addresses associated with Yearn Finance and Convex Finance accounted for nearly 90% of the votes cast against the grant.

The concentration of dissenting votes from these entities drew attention to how a small number of large stakeholders can shape governance outcomes at Curve.

Process Concerns and Historical Context

Beyond the final tally, forum discussions highlighted procedural issues. Some tokenholders stated that Swiss Stake should provide clearer disclosure on how previous allocations were used before seeking additional funding. Others suggested that future grants, if approved, be distributed in multiple installments to reduce potential market impact on CRV.

The rejection contrasts with a prior funding decision. In August 2024, Egorov requested more than 21 million CRV tokens, worth approximately $6.3 million at the time, and the DAO approved the proposal with nearly 91% support. The shift in voting outcomes indicates tighter scrutiny of funding requests.

Comparable governance debates have emerged elsewhere in DeFi, including at Aave, where recent fee allocation decisions prompted discussion about tokenholder rights and governance processes.

Following the vote, CRV traded higher over 24 hours, rising to around $0.377, reflecting a gain of approximately 5.4%. Trading volume increased to about $112.6 million, while market capitalization climbed to $538.9 million.

Related: Curve DAO Proposal Seeks $6.7 Million in CRV for Llamalend V2 and FXSwap

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/curve-dao-rejects-6-2m-crv-grant-for-core-development-team/

Market Opportunity
Curve Logo
Curve Price(CRV)
$0.3727
$0.3727$0.3727
+2.16%
USD
Curve (CRV) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated

The post Satoshi-Era Mt. Gox’s 1,000 Bitcoin Wallet Suddenly Reactivated appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X account @SaniExp, which belongs to the founder of the Timechain Index explorer, has published data showing that a dormant BTC wallet was activated after hibernating for six years. However, it was set up 13 years ago, according to the tweet — the time when Satoshi Nakamoto’s shadow was still casting itself around, so to speak. The X post states that the tweet belongs to infamous early Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, which suffered from a major hack in the early 2010s, and last year it began paying out compensation to clients who lost their crypto in that hack. The deadline was eventually extended to October 2025. Mt. Gox’s wallet with 1,000 BTC reactivated The above-mentioned data source shared a screenshot from the Timechain Index explorer, showing multiple transactions marked as confirmed and moving a total of 1,000 Bitcoins. This amount of crypto is valued at $116,195,100 at the time of the initiated transaction. Last year, Mt. Gox began to move the remains of its gargantuan funds to pay out compensations to its creditors. Earlier this year, it also made several massive transactions to partner exchanges to distribute funds to Mt. Gox investors. All of the compensations were promised to be paid out by Oct. 31, 2025. The aforementioned transaction is likely preparation for another payout. The exchange was hacked for several years due to multiple unnoticed security breaches, and in 2014, when the site went offline, 744,408 Bitcoins were reported stolen. Source: https://u.today/satoshi-era-mtgoxs-1000-bitcoin-wallet-suddenly-reactivated
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 10:18
lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05
Ripple CTO Explains How The XRP Ledger ‘Will Take Over The World’

Ripple CTO Explains How The XRP Ledger ‘Will Take Over The World’

On a Token Relations webinar for the XRP ecosystem on Dec. 20, Ripple CTO David Schwartz was asked the sort of question that usually produces a tidy dashboard answer
Share
Bitcoinist2025/12/24 06:00