The post Lithuania Warns Crypto Firms to Exit or License Before Dec. 31, 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Lithuania sets December 31, 2025, as the end The post Lithuania Warns Crypto Firms to Exit or License Before Dec. 31, 2025 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Lithuania sets December 31, 2025, as the end

Lithuania Warns Crypto Firms to Exit or License Before Dec. 31, 2025

  • Lithuania sets December 31, 2025, as the end of its crypto licensing transition period
  • Lietuvos bankas urges operators to begin client communication about winding down.
  • Unlicensed operations after the deadline face criminal penalties up to 4 years in prison.

Lithuania’s central bank, Lietuvos bankas, urged virtual currency exchange and depository wallet operators that do not intend to seek authorization under the EU’s MiCA framework to begin an orderly wind-down of their operations. The transitional period for obtaining licenses ends December 31, 2025.

The guidance targets operators included in lists maintained by the State Enterprise Centre of Registers who do not intend to provide services under Regulation (EU) No 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets. After the transitional period expires, accepting new clients and custody of crypto-assets without proper licensing will constitute illegal financial activities.

Operators Must Execute Client Communication Plans

Dalia Juškevičienė, head of the Investment Services and Undertakings Supervision Division, stated that market participants not planning to continue operations should launch active communication campaigns. All clients require proper and timely information regarding the winding-down process.

Operators must provide information on winding-down timeframes and detailed instructions for transferring funds and crypto-assets. Clients need notification about the possibility of exchanging crypto-assets for funds that operators would transfer to custodians at the client’s instruction.

Lietuvos bankas stated that operators must ensure information reaches clients through multiple channels rather than a single channel of communication. Operators should complete all steps to return client assets before losing authorization to provide crypto-asset services. 

Lithuania Punishes Unlicensed Financial Services

The Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania establishes that providing financial services without required licenses is punishable by public works, fines, restriction of liberty, or imprisonment for up to four years. Lietuvos bankas holds the authority to block websites of illegal financial service providers.

The central bank publishes information on persons illegally offering or providing financial services in Lithuania and declares such activities illegal. Lietuvos bankas notifies relevant law enforcement authorities of facts indicating potentially criminal activities.

Currently, approximately 30 companies have submitted applications to Lietuvos bankas for crypto-asset service provider licenses. The bank is assessing 10 applications. More than 370 companies declared to the State Enterprise Centre of Registers that they provide crypto-asset services, but only 120 actually operate by generating revenue and submitting financial statements.

Related: Italy’s Consob Sets Strict December 30 Deadline for Crypto Firms to Enter MiCA Regime

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/lithuania-sets-december-31-2025-deadline-for-crypto-service-providers-to-obtain-licenses/

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02041
$0.02041$0.02041
0.00%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Top political stories of 2025: The Villar family’s business and political setbacks

Rappler's Dwight de Leon recaps the challenges faced in 2025 by one of the Philippines' wealthiest families
Share
Rappler2025/12/25 09:00