TLDR Federal Reserve researchers propose treating cryptocurrencies as a separate asset class in derivatives markets. The researchers argue that cryptocurrenciesTLDR Federal Reserve researchers propose treating cryptocurrencies as a separate asset class in derivatives markets. The researchers argue that cryptocurrencies

U.S. Federal Reserve Calls for Separate Risk Class for Crypto Derivatives

2026/02/14 03:37
3 min read

TLDR

  • Federal Reserve researchers propose treating cryptocurrencies as a separate asset class in derivatives markets.
  • The researchers argue that cryptocurrencies have unique risks that existing financial models cannot capture.
  • The proposal divides cryptocurrencies into two categories: pegged and floating, based on their price stability.
  • Margin requirements for crypto derivatives may become stricter and more accurately reflect the volatility of digital assets.
  • The Federal Reserve’s research is not a formal regulation but could influence future policy changes in crypto markets.

U.S. Federal Reserve researchers have proposed classifying cryptocurrencies as a separate asset class in derivatives markets. This proposal stems from the unique risks and volatility that digital assets present. Researchers argue that the current financial system fails to capture these risks effectively.

Why Crypto Needs Its Own Category

In their recent paper, the Federal Reserve researchers highlight the differences between cryptocurrencies and traditional financial assets. They point out that cryptocurrencies often exhibit abrupt market stress, quick price movements, and large price swings. These behaviors make it difficult to assess risk using conventional models, which apply to assets like stocks and commodities.

As such, the researchers suggest the creation of a distinct crypto risk category within the current margin framework. The proposal divides cryptocurrencies into two groups: pegged and floating. Pegged cryptocurrencies, like stablecoins, are designed to mirror the value of traditional currencies and generally experience less fluctuation. Floating cryptocurrencies, on the other hand, are driven purely by market supply and demand and can experience sharp price movements.

Federal Reserve Framework for Crypto Margin Requirements

The study recommends that margin requirements for crypto derivatives be adjusted based on long-term market data. This would include periods of financial stress, a method familiar to existing risk management models. The goal is to tailor margin calculations specifically to the behavior of digital assets, reflecting their higher volatility.

By separating cryptocurrencies into distinct categories, the Federal Reserve believes margin requirements can be more accurate and aligned with the inherent risk. For instance, contracts tied to volatile assets would likely require higher collateral, ensuring that margin requirements reflect the real-time risk. The Fed’s research aims to prevent under-collateralization, where trading losses exceed the collateral posted.

The Federal Reserve’s analysis is not a regulation but a proposal based on research. Any formal change would require industry adoption or regulatory action. Still, as digital assets become more integrated with traditional finance, clearer rules could help manage the growing involvement of banks, funds, and trading firms in cryptocurrency markets.

The post U.S. Federal Reserve Calls for Separate Risk Class for Crypto Derivatives appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.