Although the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has publicly released, with redactions, thousands of files related to the late billionaire financier and convictedAlthough the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has publicly released, with redactions, thousands of files related to the late billionaire financier and convicted

What a deleted DOJ Epstein record reveals about potential Maxwell blackmail against Trump

2026/02/20 19:56
3 min read

Although the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has publicly released, with redactions, thousands of files related to the late billionaire financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, many questions about his crimes and who was or wasn't a part of them remain unanswered. Journalist Roger Sollenberger, in a February 20 column posted on his Substack page, focuses on a document related to President Donald Trump that disappeared from DOJ's Epstein files database only to reappear later.

Sollenberger first reported on the document's disappearance in a February 18 column. But by Thursday night, February 19, the reporter notes, the document had reappeared.

The document pertains to a woman who alleged to the FBI that Trump sexually assaulted her when she was a child.

Sollenberger explains, "It's unclear why the DOJ deleted the document in the first place…. The information in the document pertaining to the Trump accuser — whom the DOJ identifies as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein in the early-mid 1980s — doesn't appear altered in any way. However, the existence of this record — more specifically, the public's knowledge of its existence — carries significant implications when it comes to the president and his DOJ's posture against Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell. That's because this document shows the FBI conducted not just one, but four, interviews with Trump's accuser. And, as I reported Wednesday, while the government gave all four of those interviews to Maxwell's legal team ahead of her trial, the government gave only one of those four interviews to us in the Epstein files."

The reporter adds, "In other words, this document shows that, in choosing to withhold three of the four interviews from the Epstein files, the DOJ has granted Maxwell potential blackmail on the sitting president of the United States."

Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence in federal prison for her role in Epstein's crimes.

Sollenberger notes that the alleged victim described in the deleted/readded DOJ document sued Epstein's estate and agreed to a "reported payout in December 2021."

"If DOJ had released those interviews with the Epstein files, as it appears the law absolutely requires, any leverage Maxwell had there would be gone," Sollenberger writes. "Instead, Trump's DOJ — starring Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche, and Kash Patel — let her keep it. What's more, the American people still wouldn't even know that Maxwell could potentially be blackmailing the president with these sworn victim statements if it weren't for the existence of precisely this document — the document I caught DOJ removing from its public database…. The record that disappeared — and is now back online — is an evidence catalog showing that those interviews were among the 'non-witness material' that DOJ prosecutors produced for Maxwell's defense team."

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Market Opportunity
OFFICIAL TRUMP Logo
OFFICIAL TRUMP Price(TRUMP)
$3.508
$3.508$3.508
+3.20%
USD
OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Thunderclap Review 2026: Is it the Best Social Media Service for Instant Gains?

Thunderclap Review 2026: Is it the Best Social Media Service for Instant Gains?

TLDR: Is Thunderclap legit? Yes, Thunderclap is a legitimate social media growth service designed to help users increase their followers, engagement, and overall
Share
AI Journal2026/02/20 21:10
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39
What next for XRP as volatility sinks to 2024 lows

What next for XRP as volatility sinks to 2024 lows

Markets Share Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
What next for XRP as volatility sinks to 202
Share
Coindesk2026/02/20 21:08