The post The P2E Apocalypse Is Gaming’s Best News appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Opinion by: Tobin Kuo, founder and CEO of Seraph Play-to-earn (P2E) had a moment — “had” its moment — but that’s the problem. Its time has passed. The thrill was the payout, not the play, not the result, which looked less like a game and more like shift work with a user interface.  To be fair, the experiments weren’t worthless. They proved that wallets can be controllers, assets can be portable, and communities can co-own the worlds they love. But it shouldn’t — and can’t — be denied that subsidies bent every design choice toward leeching mechanics. Everything was extraction: recruit, inflate, cash out and repeat.  With the audience shrinking with the faucet drip rate, reasons to keep playing fall, and so, let us now let P2E die without soft parting words or a eulogy. The slowdown shouldn’t be feared or loathed; it’s just a natural process of exploration, and now, it should be considered a filter — one that forces teams to build games someone will play even if its native token goes to zero. Gaming finance (GameFi) needs to purge traditional thinking and mechanics, learn from the past and take three simple steps: grow the play element, shrink the earn and give the genre a chance to thrive. The painful truth P2E primed GameFi to chase the yield of tokens instead of the true purpose of play: fun. The end results are economies that crumble under design choices that extract enjoyment at every turn. It’s a painful reality where incentives are paid more than the gameplay ever delivered.  As retention collapsed, new money flows slowed, tokens spiraled, and projects folded under the weight. The numbers don’t lie. Funding for blockchain gaming dipped 93% year-over-year in Q2 this year, while daily unique active wallets fell by double digits. Related:… The post The P2E Apocalypse Is Gaming’s Best News appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Opinion by: Tobin Kuo, founder and CEO of Seraph Play-to-earn (P2E) had a moment — “had” its moment — but that’s the problem. Its time has passed. The thrill was the payout, not the play, not the result, which looked less like a game and more like shift work with a user interface.  To be fair, the experiments weren’t worthless. They proved that wallets can be controllers, assets can be portable, and communities can co-own the worlds they love. But it shouldn’t — and can’t — be denied that subsidies bent every design choice toward leeching mechanics. Everything was extraction: recruit, inflate, cash out and repeat.  With the audience shrinking with the faucet drip rate, reasons to keep playing fall, and so, let us now let P2E die without soft parting words or a eulogy. The slowdown shouldn’t be feared or loathed; it’s just a natural process of exploration, and now, it should be considered a filter — one that forces teams to build games someone will play even if its native token goes to zero. Gaming finance (GameFi) needs to purge traditional thinking and mechanics, learn from the past and take three simple steps: grow the play element, shrink the earn and give the genre a chance to thrive. The painful truth P2E primed GameFi to chase the yield of tokens instead of the true purpose of play: fun. The end results are economies that crumble under design choices that extract enjoyment at every turn. It’s a painful reality where incentives are paid more than the gameplay ever delivered.  As retention collapsed, new money flows slowed, tokens spiraled, and projects folded under the weight. The numbers don’t lie. Funding for blockchain gaming dipped 93% year-over-year in Q2 this year, while daily unique active wallets fell by double digits. Related:…

The P2E Apocalypse Is Gaming’s Best News

Opinion by: Tobin Kuo, founder and CEO of Seraph

Play-to-earn (P2E) had a moment — “had” its moment — but that’s the problem. Its time has passed. The thrill was the payout, not the play, not the result, which looked less like a game and more like shift work with a user interface. 

To be fair, the experiments weren’t worthless. They proved that wallets can be controllers, assets can be portable, and communities can co-own the worlds they love. But it shouldn’t — and can’t — be denied that subsidies bent every design choice toward leeching mechanics. Everything was extraction: recruit, inflate, cash out and repeat. 

With the audience shrinking with the faucet drip rate, reasons to keep playing fall, and so, let us now let P2E die without soft parting words or a eulogy. The slowdown shouldn’t be feared or loathed; it’s just a natural process of exploration, and now, it should be considered a filter — one that forces teams to build games someone will play even if its native token goes to zero.

Gaming finance (GameFi) needs to purge traditional thinking and mechanics, learn from the past and take three simple steps: grow the play element, shrink the earn and give the genre a chance to thrive.

The painful truth

P2E primed GameFi to chase the yield of tokens instead of the true purpose of play: fun. The end results are economies that crumble under design choices that extract enjoyment at every turn. It’s a painful reality where incentives are paid more than the gameplay ever delivered. 

As retention collapsed, new money flows slowed, tokens spiraled, and projects folded under the weight. The numbers don’t lie. Funding for blockchain gaming dipped 93% year-over-year in Q2 this year, while daily unique active wallets fell by double digits.

Related: Burn the tokens, keep the loot: Play-to-own games come next

More than 300 Web3 games went inactive, exposing how shallow the engagement was when rewards no longer covered the grind. It was a painful and bitter pill to swallow, but it brought clarity.

Games that had nothing to offer beyond emissions are dead or dying, and now builders have been left with the rubble of P2E in which to rebuild from the ground up. It’s time to ship systems that actually entertain people.

Regulation cracks the door open further to amplify the reality check: a healthy step for the GameFi scene. As bright lines are drawn around the plague of money-first, fun-second game loops, the P2E games, simply functioning as extraction machines, get treated like gambling. 

Consider India’s legislation banning money-based online games, slapping “earn-first” mechanics with scrutiny they can’t hide from whenever they blur into consumer harm or wagering. It doesn’t spell the end of onchain gaming; it’s just forcing the games to be created fit for purpose (rather than turning into gambling engines to be milked dry).

Teams building P2E games now must address the T. Rex in the room: no more building to bleed dry, no more hype. No more extracting from the fun of games in exchange for inflationary tokens and feigned “play.” The time for actual play is now. Get building.

Ownership without extraction

The correction is already outlined in the Q2 data. Funding is drying up, and the retention gimmicks aren’t fooling anyone. Games built on spreadsheets and emissions schedules were never built with genuine long-term consideration.

The way forward is expression, not extraction. It’s about creating worlds where seasonal resets recycle value in fresh ways, where items feel genuinely earned through effort, skill and persistence rather than bought through shortcuts. 

A healthy system respects scarcity as a design principle — moments, achievements and artifacts matter precisely because they cannot be infinitely duplicated. The idea that players primarily want another income stream must be cast out. Games are not financial instruments first; they are spaces of creativity, competition and community.

It is time to sunset play-to-earn without regret and to recognize it as a detour rather than a destiny. The industry’s real momentum will come from returning to the values that have always sustained great games: joy, mastery and meaningful play.

The resolve to build the next great generation of games will not come from token mechanics or speculative loops, but from honoring the player-first spirit that has always driven this medium forward.

Opinion by: Tobin Kuo, founder and CEO of Seraph.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/p2e-gaming-apocalypse?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
Seraph Logo
Seraph Price(SERAPH)
$0.01098
$0.01098$0.01098
+0.36%
USD
Seraph (SERAPH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Why 100 Percent Test Coverage is Not Possible — Lessons from Testing Banking and Healthcare Systems

Quality is not about testing everything; quality is about testing what is most important.
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/26 16:05
US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

US eyes crypto mining at disputed nuclear plant in Russia-Ukraine conflict: report

The plant is located in Ukraine and has been under Russian control since 2022, with its future management a key issue in peace talks.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/26 18:58
Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Google's AP2 protocol has been released. Does encrypted AI still have a chance?

Following the MCP and A2A protocols, the AI Agent market has seen another blockbuster arrival: the Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), developed by Google. This will clearly further enhance AI Agents' autonomous multi-tasking capabilities, but the unfortunate reality is that it has little to do with web3AI. Let's take a closer look: What problem does AP2 solve? Simply put, the MCP protocol is like a universal hook, enabling AI agents to connect to various external tools and data sources; A2A is a team collaboration communication protocol that allows multiple AI agents to cooperate with each other to complete complex tasks; AP2 completes the last piece of the puzzle - payment capability. In other words, MCP opens up connectivity, A2A promotes collaboration efficiency, and AP2 achieves value exchange. The arrival of AP2 truly injects "soul" into the autonomous collaboration and task execution of Multi-Agents. Imagine AI Agents connecting Qunar, Meituan, and Didi to complete the booking of flights, hotels, and car rentals, but then getting stuck at the point of "self-payment." What's the point of all that multitasking? So, remember this: AP2 is an extension of MCP+A2A, solving the last mile problem of AI Agent automated execution. What are the technical highlights of AP2? The core innovation of AP2 is the Mandates mechanism, which is divided into real-time authorization mode and delegated authorization mode. Real-time authorization is easy to understand. The AI Agent finds the product and shows it to you. The operation can only be performed after the user signs. Delegated authorization requires the user to set rules in advance, such as only buying the iPhone 17 when the price drops to 5,000. The AI Agent monitors the trigger conditions and executes automatically. The implementation logic is cryptographically signed using Verifiable Credentials (VCs). Users can set complex commission conditions, including price ranges, time limits, and payment method priorities, forming a tamper-proof digital contract. Once signed, the AI Agent executes according to the conditions, with VCs ensuring auditability and security at every step. Of particular note is the "A2A x402" extension, a technical component developed by Google specifically for crypto payments, developed in collaboration with Coinbase and the Ethereum Foundation. This extension enables AI Agents to seamlessly process stablecoins, ETH, and other blockchain assets, supporting native payment scenarios within the Web3 ecosystem. What kind of imagination space can AP2 bring? After analyzing the technical principles, do you think that's it? Yes, in fact, the AP2 is boring when it is disassembled alone. Its real charm lies in connecting and opening up the "MCP+A2A+AP2" technology stack, completely opening up the complete link of AI Agent's autonomous analysis+execution+payment. From now on, AI Agents can open up many application scenarios. For example, AI Agents for stock investment and financial management can help us monitor the market 24/7 and conduct independent transactions. Enterprise procurement AI Agents can automatically replenish and renew without human intervention. AP2's complementary payment capabilities will further expand the penetration of the Agent-to-Agent economy into more scenarios. Google obviously understands that after the technical framework is established, the ecological implementation must be relied upon, so it has brought in more than 60 partners to develop it, almost covering the entire payment and business ecosystem. Interestingly, it also involves major Crypto players such as Ethereum, Coinbase, MetaMask, and Sui. Combined with the current trend of currency and stock integration, the imagination space has been doubled. Is web3 AI really dead? Not entirely. Google's AP2 looks complete, but it only achieves technical compatibility with Crypto payments. It can only be regarded as an extension of the traditional authorization framework and belongs to the category of automated execution. There is a "paradigm" difference between it and the autonomous asset management pursued by pure Crypto native solutions. The Crypto-native solutions under exploration are taking the "decentralized custody + on-chain verification" route, including AI Agent autonomous asset management, AI Agent autonomous transactions (DeFAI), AI Agent digital identity and on-chain reputation system (ERC-8004...), AI Agent on-chain governance DAO framework, AI Agent NPC and digital avatars, and many other interesting and fun directions. Ultimately, once users get used to AI Agent payments in traditional fields, their acceptance of AI Agents autonomously owning digital assets will also increase. And for those scenarios that AP2 cannot reach, such as anonymous transactions, censorship-resistant payments, and decentralized asset management, there will always be a time for crypto-native solutions to show their strength? The two are more likely to be complementary rather than competitive, but to be honest, the key technological advancements behind AI Agents currently all come from web2AI, and web3AI still needs to keep up the good work!
Share
PANews2025/09/18 07:00