The post South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea’s regulators are advancing plans to limit Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to bank-led consortia, requiring commercial banks to hold at least 51% stakes. This framework aims to safeguard financial stability and monetary policy while issuing the Digital Asset Basic Act by early 2025. South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions. The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management. With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers. South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments. What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework? South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act. How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea? The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem… The post South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea’s regulators are advancing plans to limit Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to bank-led consortia, requiring commercial banks to hold at least 51% stakes. This framework aims to safeguard financial stability and monetary policy while issuing the Digital Asset Basic Act by early 2025. South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions. The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management. With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers. South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments. What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework? South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act. How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea? The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem…

South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance

  • South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions.

  • The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management.

  • With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers.

South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments.

What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework?

South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act.

How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea?

The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem but limiting flexibility for non-bank players.

Data from the Bank of Korea highlights the urgency: non-bank issuers could disrupt traditional banking by mimicking narrow bank operations, issuing currency alongside payment services without full regulatory buffers. For instance, the central bank’s recent warnings emphasize that such entities might undermine financial stability, with potential impacts on the 1.2 trillion South Korean won in circulating stablecoin equivalents reported in late 2024. Expert analysts from the Korea Institute of Finance note that bank involvement could enhance trust, drawing parallels to successful models in jurisdictions like the European Union.

However, this bank-centric model raises questions about innovation. Fintech advocates argue it may stifle competition, confining stablecoins to basic transactional roles rather than enabling advanced applications in decentralized finance or cross-border remittances. The Financial Services Commission’s post-meeting statement underscores that no final decisions have been made, signaling ongoing negotiations to refine the consortium’s operational guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the Key Requirements for Issuing Korean-Won-Pegged Stablecoins Under South Korea’s New Rules?

Under the proposed South Korea stablecoin regulation, issuers must form consortia with commercial banks holding over 51% of shares, ensuring robust oversight and compliance with national monetary policies. This setup prioritizes financial stability, as outlined in discussions by the Democratic Party and Financial Services Commission, preventing risks from unregulated entities.

Why Is the Bank of Korea Concerned About Non-Bank Stablecoin Issuers?

The Bank of Korea views non-bank stablecoin issuers as potential threats to monetary sovereignty and financial systems because they operate like narrow banks, issuing digital currency without traditional safeguards. This could erode deposit protections and complicate policy implementation, as highlighted in the central bank’s advisory reports from November 2024.

Key Takeaways

  • Bank-Dominated Consortia: Requiring over 51% bank ownership in stablecoin issuers to fortify regulatory control and protect the Korean won’s integrity.
  • Legislative Timeline: Government must submit a draft Digital Asset Basic Act by December 10, 2024, with potential lawmaker-led passage if delayed, targeting enactment in January 2025.
  • Balancing Act: While addressing Bank of Korea’s stability concerns, the framework may limit fintech innovation—monitor for adjustments in ongoing stakeholder dialogues.

Conclusion

South Korea’s stablecoin regulation marks a pivotal shift toward integrating digital assets under bank-led oversight, with the consortium model central to the Digital Asset Basic Act. By prioritizing financial security and addressing Bank of Korea warnings, this framework positions the nation as a leader in balanced crypto governance. As the December 10 deadline approaches, stakeholders should prepare for enhanced compliance, potentially unlocking safer innovations in the Korean-won-pegged stablecoin space—engage with evolving policies to navigate this transformative era.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/south-korea-plans-bank-led-consortia-for-korean-won-stablecoin-issuance

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.04577
$0.04577$0.04577
+7.46%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims In a significant move for cryptocurrency security, Trust Wallet has committed
Share
bitcoinworld2025/12/26 17:40
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

CZ hinted at possible insider involvement in the Trust Wallet incident while assuring users that their funds would be reimbursed.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/12/26 16:48