Calling Bitcoin a scam reflects investor psychology, not fundamentals, with prospect theory explaining panic selling after sharp drops.Calling Bitcoin a scam reflects investor psychology, not fundamentals, with prospect theory explaining panic selling after sharp drops.

Bitcoin ‘Scam’ Myth Exposed: How Prospect Theory Explains Investor Panic and Losses

Bitcoin (BTC) critics have returned to a familiar refrain, calling the asset a scam as it struggles to go back to the five-figure level it last enjoyed in mid-November.

However, crypto commentator Shanaka Anslem Perera has reframed the argument as a psychological response rather than a financial one, tying panic selling to Nobel Prize–winning prospect theory.

The Psychology Behind the “Scam” Label

In a November 17 post on X, Perera argued that steep corrections often push retail investors to search for explanations that match emotional pain. Prospect theory, developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky and awarded the Nobel Prize in 2002, holds that losses feel roughly twice as painful as gains feel rewarding. And when Bitcoin, for example, drops 30% to 40% after euphoric buying, labeling it a scam becomes an emotional outlet.

The analyst cited data claiming that around 70% of retail traders who buy during rallies sell at a loss within a year, while long-term holders who kept Bitcoin for four years or more have historically avoided losses even when buying at cycle peaks.

He also pointed to shrinking drawdowns across cycles, from more than 90% in 2011 to about 50–60% in the current one, as evidence that volatility has been easing with maturity.

Perera’s assertions found some support among the online crypto community, with user Gary Krug stating that “Calling Bitcoin a scam is usually a response to emotional whiplash, not analysis.” He also added that markets punish impatience before they reward conviction.

Another account, Bitcoinfinity, questioned why investors struggle to build positions slowly, to which Perera replied that humans naturally chase quick gains. The key takeaway, according to the market observer, is that surviving Bitcoin’s cycles requires an extended time horizon, where traders shift from seeking quick gains to disciplined accumulation.

Market Strain and a Clash of Narratives

The “Bitcoin is a scam” framing has landed at a time the asset is entering one of its longest “extreme fear” readings, according to market trackers, giving critics fresh ammunition while reinforcing the psychological argument raised by supporters. Recently, prominent economist Steve Hanke claimed the asset has “zero fundamental value,” framing the current downturn as proof of a failing system.

The flagship cryptocurrency has fallen nearly 31% from its all-time high and briefly dipped near $85,000 earlier this week before rebounding toward $88,000, only to slip back to around $87,000 earlier today. According to veteran analyst PlanB, selling pressure is split between long-term holders still shaken by 2021, technical traders watching momentum indicators, and cycle-focused investors expecting further downside.

On the other side are buyers focused on fundamentals and institutional adoption, creating what he described as a stalemate until sellers exhaust themselves. That tug-of-war has kept Bitcoin lagging traditional assets in the one-year window, with data shared by Perera showing the digital asset with an ROI of -15% compared to Gold’s +65% and the S&P 500’s +14%.

However, over longer periods, BTC has significantly outperformed the two, starting at +422% ROI in the last three years against gold’s +141% and SPX’s +49%. Since its invention, BTC has achieved a return of more than 2 million % while its traditional counterparts have respectively only managed +167% and +447% in that time.

The post Bitcoin ‘Scam’ Myth Exposed: How Prospect Theory Explains Investor Panic and Losses appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Market Opportunity
Scamcoin Logo
Scamcoin Price(SCAM)
$0.000986
$0.000986$0.000986
+2.28%
USD
Scamcoin (SCAM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims In a significant move for cryptocurrency security, Trust Wallet has committed
Share
bitcoinworld2025/12/26 17:40
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

CZ hinted at possible insider involvement in the Trust Wallet incident while assuring users that their funds would be reimbursed.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/12/26 16:48