U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
U.S. Community Banks Push to Close GENIUS Act Stablecoin “Yield Loophole”
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
News Brief
U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
Summary
U.S. community banks are urging lawmakers to close a perceived “loophole” in the GENIUS Act that allows crypto exchanges to offer yield on stablecoins, arguing it creates unfair competition with traditional banks and could accelerate deposit outflows.
What Banks Are Objecting To
- Stablecoin yield products offered by exchanges
- Ability to provide interest‑like returns without being banks
- Potential for consumers to treat yield‑bearing stablecoins as deposit substitutes
Banks argue this activity looks economically similar to deposits but operates outside the full banking regulatory framework.
Why This Matters
- Competitive pressure: Yield‑bearing stablecoins can attract funds away from community banks
- Regulatory boundary debate: Where to draw the line between payments, securities, and banking
- Policy precedent: How this issue is resolved could shape the future of on‑chain finance in the U.S.
At stake is whether stablecoin issuers and exchanges can compete on yield without bank charters.
The Counterargument
Crypto advocates contend that:
- Stablecoin yields often come from market activity or reserves, not lending deposits
- Users are not guaranteed principal the same way bank deposits are
- Innovation should not be constrained to protect incumbents
They argue consumer disclosure—not prohibition—is the right approach.
Broader Implications
- Could influence final GENIUS Act language
- May determine whether stablecoins evolve into cash‑like instruments or yield‑bearing financial products
- Signals rising tension as crypto competes directly with traditional banking services
Bottom Line
Community banks’ push to close the GENIUS Act’s stablecoin yield “loophole” highlights a core conflict: stablecoins are starting to compete with bank deposits. How lawmakers respond will shape whether yield remains a feature of U.S.‑regulated stablecoins—or is pushed back into the traditional banking system.
Market Opportunity
Union Price(U)
$0.000904
$0.000904$0.000904
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles published on this page are written by independent contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of MEXC. All content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — please conduct your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
You May Also Like
The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For
The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush. Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs. Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Stablecoin market hits $312B as banks, card networks embrace onchain dollars
Finance
Share
Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
Share
Coindesk2026/03/10 22:48
China Bans Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D Chip Amid AI Hardware Push
TLDR China instructs major firms to cancel orders for Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D chip. Nvidia shares drop 1.5% after China’s ban on key AI hardware. China accelerates development of domestic AI chips, reducing U.S. tech reliance. Crypto and AI sectors may seek alternatives due to limited Nvidia access in China. China has taken a bold [...] The post China Bans Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D Chip Amid AI Hardware Push appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 01:09