'She always finds an excuse to connect with him, even after their breakup''She always finds an excuse to connect with him, even after their breakup'

[Two Pronged] Fiancé’s ex-girlfriend won’t stop contacting him

2026/01/11 11:30

Rappler’s Life and Style section runs an advice column by couple Jeremy Baer and clinical psychologist Dr. Margarita Holmes.

Jeremy has a master’s degree in law from Oxford University. A banker of 37 years who worked in three continents, he has been training with Dr. Holmes for the last 10 years as co-lecturer and, occasionally, as co-therapist, especially with clients whose financial concerns intrude into their daily lives.

Together, they have written two books: Love Triangles: Understanding the Macho-Mistress Mentality and Imported Love: Filipino-Foreign Liaisons.


Dear Dr. Holmes and Mr. Baer:

I am a senior citizen, 53 years old, and engaged to another senior citizen. This will be a second marriage for us both.

My first marriage ended because my husband was unfaithful. After over 20 years, I finally got my annulment. His first marriage lasting 33 years ended amicably, via divorce. They outgrew each other, but they are still friends.

My problem is this. Before our engagement my fiancé “John” had a girlfriend “Melanie” (4 years together). Before that, even before he had his girlfriend Melanie, John and I were together until I realized he could not commit himself to me exclusively.

Only after we broke up he got himself this girlfriend.

They broke up, he courted me again, promising this time it would be different. He has kept his promise. We are scheduled to be married this April.

My problem is that Melanie won’t leave him alone. She always finds an excuse to connect with him, even after their breakup. First, because she was “so hurt” she made him promise he could not contact me for a month. 

He obeyed her, despite him already courting me. I was so worried when I did not hear from him, but still he did that because he wanted to keep his word to Melanie. They had already broken up by then, but still, he obeyed her.

Second, he invited me to go to South Africa with him. We went and both loved it. I only found out after that they too had plans to go there before they broke up.

When she found out he was taking me, she called him and asked him to postpone his trip with me for a year so it would not hurt her too much. 

Finally, Melanie also ordered some special delicacies John’s family is known for. She wants it for April 19, because she will be in the Philippines that day. She told his family this, they told John, and John eventually told me.

April 22 is when we are scheduled to be married. We have already booked the church and the venue.

I cannot stop thinking about Melanie’s plans to be in the Philippines three days before our wedding. I do not want to have to fight for him 3 days before we get married. I am not as sophisticated as Melanie. I do not have the skills to fight this without breaking down and crying. Please help me.

– Lenny


Dear Lenny,

As you yourself admit, John has a less than stellar reputation. First time round, you broke up because he couldn’t offer you an exclusive relationship. Second time round, despite promises that things would be different, all the signs are that he is clinging on to his relationship with his ex, Melanie, who herself is showing no signs of giving him up.

It may be true that he is not technically cheating on you — not contacting you, delaying trips and ordering delicacies are not the equivalent of sexual infidelity — but they do not suggest an exclusive relationship with you either. Instead, he seems anxious to keep in touch with Melanie and cater unquestioningly to her whims.

These are not the actions of a man readying himself to pronounce his marriage vow to “love, honor and cherish you, forsaking all others.” 

The months before a wedding are usually the time when the bridegroom to be is on his best behavior, trying to persuade you that your choice of spouse is fully justified. Instead, he is dancing to the tune of a previous girlfriend.

It is time to call him out, before the wedding, before it’s too late. Either he cuts all ties with Melanie and demonstrates his love, devotion, respect and attention to you exclusively or you should seriously reconsider his suitability as a future husband. A fiancé who puts you first, keeps his promises, and consigns his ex to history is the very least you should expect.

All the best,

– JAF Baer


Dear Lenny,

Thank you very much for your letter.  I must admit I did not expect Mr. Baer to adopt such a strong, take-no-prisoners stand. Mr. Baer has already decided that John is a doormat, still doing what his ex Melanie asks him to do.

I disagree. Yes, he did the almost inexcusable: not calling you for a month when you would understandably be more nervous than usual because this would be the first time John and his ex would meet again. Yes, he should have known better.

Admittedly, I  have never met John, but I feel the reason for his one-month silence was NOT because he chose Melanie over you, but because he didn’t want to hurt her. 

Take note: because she was ‘so hurt” she felt her “no-contact-for-a-month” request would not be a problem. After 4 years, she knows John and what works with him.

This hypothesis is borne out because she again used the “so hurt” excuse when she called and told him she would again be hurt if he did not postpone his South Africa trip for a year.

Melanie knows him enough to know this would ordinarily work. What she didn’t factor in was that John, after acquiescing to her first request and, I imagine, after you then told him how you felt about his silence, was a bit more discerning about her machinations.  

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. He did go to South Africa with you in less than a year, despite her being “hurt.” If you are the type to count wins and losses (as, alas, often I am) this time you “won.” Best of all, you won without having to fight for it, without even knowing Melanie asked this of him. 

I daresay he is starting to discern the difference between an ex girlfriend and his fiancé. Good for him, good for you both, Win 2 for you!

Regrading her final attempt planned for April 19 — this time you can tell him how you feel. I agree with Jeremy’s advice to cut and cut cleanly in case he doesn’t immediately agree with you. 

The first time he acquiesced, I feel, can be forgiven because he didn’t want to hurt her. Whether with basis or not, he probably felt breaking up with her was not gentlemanly so the least he could do is make it hurt less. (P.S. if the marriage pulls through in April, I think I should be Ninang, don’t you? 😊) 

This third attempt should be a clear message to Melanie that it’s over between them. Not only is he in love with you, but he loves you and wants to spend the rest of his life with you. 

If you are not 100% sure of this by now, then I agree entirely with Mr. Baer: “A fiancé who puts you first, keeps his promises, and consigns his ex to history is the very least you should expect.”

All the best,

– MG Holmes

– Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.009648
$0.009648$0.009648
-1.94%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Grayscale Moves $25M in Crypto to Coinbase Prime

Grayscale Moves $25M in Crypto to Coinbase Prime

The post Grayscale Moves $25M in Crypto to Coinbase Prime appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Grayscale moved $25M in ETH/SOL to Coinbase Prime. Transfer
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/11 18:46
Coinbase to list AUDD and XSGD stablecoins on September 29

Coinbase to list AUDD and XSGD stablecoins on September 29

The post Coinbase to list AUDD and XSGD stablecoins on September 29 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Coinbase will start listing AUDD and XSGD, two fiat-backed local stablecoins, on September 29 at 19:00 UTC, according to an official update published by the company. These are the first Australian dollar and Singapore dollar stablecoins to be added to the platform, with trading available globally; no regions are geo-blocked. The company claims that this move is part of its plan to help onboard a billion people into crypto by giving users the ability to transact in familiar currencies. People in Australia and Singapore will be able to convert AUD to AUDD and SGD to XSGD without paying fees, according to Coinbase. Local stablecoins start gaining serious traction The stablecoin market is blowing up. It crossed $250 billion in market cap by June 2025, which is a 50% jump from the previous year. In 2024, these tokens processed more than $30 trillion in transactions. And that number’s still climbing. Analysts now expect stablecoins could grow into a $2 trillion asset class in the next few years. That growth is dragging in businesses too. In Coinbase’s State of Crypto report, 81% of crypto-aware small and mid-sized U.S. businesses said they want to start using stablecoins for payments. On top of that, the number of Fortune 500 companies looking into stablecoins has more than tripled since last year. But almost everything onchain is still in U.S. dollars. About 60% of global currency reserves are held in USD, but 99% of stablecoins in circulation are pegged to it. That makes it hard for people outside of the U.S. to move money in their own currencies. Local stablecoins like AUDD and XSGD aim to fix that gap. A survey by Ipsos for Coinbase found that over 70% of crypto owners in Australia and Singapore want local stablecoins they can actually use. Coinbase says adding…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/25 00:34
Gavin Newsom Referred For Secret Service ‘Threat Assessment’ After X Post

Gavin Newsom Referred For Secret Service ‘Threat Assessment’ After X Post

The post Gavin Newsom Referred For Secret Service ‘Threat Assessment’ After X Post appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Bill Essayli, the acting U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, on Saturday said he referred Gov. Gavin Newsom to the Secret Service for a “full threat assessment,” after Newsom wrote on social media a jab targeting Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. The California governor wrote on X: “Kristi Noem is going to have a bad day today.” Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved Key Facts “We have zero tolerance for direct or implicit threats against government officials,” Essayli wrote on X, adding he “referred this matter” to the Secret Service and requested a “full threat assessment,” though it’s not immediately clear what the assessment would entail. Essayli responded to an earlier social media post from Newsom, who wrote, “Kristi Noem is going to have a bad day today,” before signing a series of bills protecting California’s immigrant population, including a ban on face coverings for federal agents and a requirement for officers to identify themselves. Noem has neither responded to Newsom nor Essayli as of 5:20 p.m. EDT on Saturday. Newsom’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Forbes, though Newsom told reporters Saturday the bills he signed “run in complete contrast to what [Noem’s] asserting and what she’s pushing.” Key Background California officials have, in recent weeks, opposed moves by the Trump administration. Newsom, who has repeatedly criticized President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown, indicated Saturday he would sign into law legislation in an effort to rebuke Homeland Security’s deportation raids in the state. The Department of Homeland Security disputed whether California could pass a bill prohibiting federal agents from wearing masks, arguing it would put agents “and their families at risk of being doxed and targeted by vicious criminals.” The Trump administration ramped up its mass deportation campaign earlier this…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/21 05:42