Algunos consejeros dijeron que el INE debe abordar la cuestión del voto electrónico desde una perspectiva más matizada no con argumentos tajantes.Algunos consejeros dijeron que el INE debe abordar la cuestión del voto electrónico desde una perspectiva más matizada no con argumentos tajantes.

Partidos recibirán hasta 147 millones de pesos de militantes en 2026

Pese a la negativa de algunos de sus integrantes, el Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE) confirmó que en estos momentos es inviable poner en marcha el voto electrónico a nivel nacional para las próximas elecciones “debido a que esta modalidad no está considerada en la normatividad aplicable”.

Tras presentar un Informe sobre la viabilidad para que las y los ciudadanos mexicanos residentes en territorio nacional emitan su voto en los próximos procesos electorales por Internet de forma similar a la que las personas mexicanas residentes en el extranjero ejercen su derecho al sufragio.

El INE anunció que se ha intensificado el análisis de la viabilidad del voto electrónico, particularmente del voto por Internet; no obstante, advirtió que es inviable la eventual implementación del voto por Internet en territorio nacional, ya que requiere condiciones normativas, operativas, registrales y tecnológicas que hoy no están plenamente configuradas.

Financiamiento privado

A su vez, el Consejo General del INE avaló los límites para el financiamiento privado a los partidos para el 2026.

El órgano electoral detalló que se permitirá a los partidos políticos nacionales que reciban hasta 147 millones 363,032 pesos, en dinero o en especie, por parte de su militancia y en aportaciones por parte de simpatizantes, en dinero o en especie, el límite será de 66 millones 97,872 pesos y 30 centavos.

Se indicó también que la aportación individual de simpatizantes no podrá superar los tres millones 304,893 pesos y 61 centavos en dinero o especie.

Market Opportunity
ELYSIA Logo
ELYSIA Price(EL)
$0.002402
$0.002402$0.002402
+0.37%
USD
ELYSIA (EL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Red state gov candidate claims Don Lemon 'lucky' he wasn't lynched

Red state gov candidate claims Don Lemon 'lucky' he wasn't lynched

Journalist Don Lemon's arrest and indictment by the Trump administration promoted howls of outrage from press figures around the country on Friday — but as far
Share
Rawstory2026/01/31 10:44
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39
Tumbling market sets giants into ‘plunge protection’ mode: Crypto Daybook Americas

Tumbling market sets giants into ‘plunge protection’ mode: Crypto Daybook Americas

The post Tumbling market sets giants into ‘plunge protection’ mode: Crypto Daybook Americas appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. :Crypto Daybook Americas By Omkar
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/31 10:18