Civil society groups are concerned that a ‘meaningful’ consultation process has not yet taken place despite the delay in submission of the updated NDC to the United NationsCivil society groups are concerned that a ‘meaningful’ consultation process has not yet taken place despite the delay in submission of the updated NDC to the United Nations

Corruption a threat to Philippines’ higher climate ambition – groups

2025/12/04 11:45

MANILA, Philippines – As the Philippine government proposes higher climate targets, groups warn that corruption can threaten the country’s capacity to implement programs needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The Philippines is proposing an unconditional target of between 10% to 20% — much higher than the 2.71% stated in the country’s current Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC).

The new target was presented to civil society groups on Wednesday, December 3, in a high-level plenary session. Even before the annual climate talks in Brazil took place, groups Rappler talked to had already complained about the lack of consultations on the new NDC.

“With a likely higher cost of implementation for the updated NDC to match the higher ambition, there is simply no room for any errors, especially those caused by corruption or inaction,” Aksyon Klima Pilipinas national coordinator John Leo Algo said in a statement Wednesday.

Countries like the Philippines that are party to the Paris Agreement are required to submit NDCs, or pledges on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Back in 2021, the Philippines pledged to reduce carbon emissions by 75% — 2.71% is unconditional and 72.29% is conditional. Parties are supposed to submit to the United Nations their revised targets early 2025.

Raising unconditional targets would mean mobilizing more national resources. Conditional targets, meanwhile, are reliant on the support that the Philippines will get from the international community.

“Any commitment like the NDC is only as good as its implementation,” said Algo.

Despite the Philippines’ delayed timeline in submission, think-tank Center for Energy, Ecology, and Development (CEED) said the government has not made use of the time to have a “meaningful” consultation process. CEED was one of the groups present at the consultation arranged by the Philippine government on Wednesday.

CEED is concerned that the 2025 NDC is slated for submission to the Office of the President by December without providing civil society the full draft as well as the analyses behind the new targets.

“Government agencies must be transparent and genuinely inclusive if we are to have an NDC that is truly backed by the people,” said CEED deputy executive director Avril de Torres.

AKP pointed out that the government agencies making the 2025 NDC cannot expect “meaningful feedback” if they are not given enough time to examine the new pledges.

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Climate Change Commission lead this process while the Department of Economy, Planning, and Development and the Department of Finance act as oversight agencies.

“In this regard, the government comes up short in ensuring an inclusive, bottom-up approach to this crucial part of finalizing the NDC,” Algo said.

So far, 122 parties have submitted their new NDCs to the United Nations. Parties are supposed to submit a revised NDC every five years, showing a progression in climate ambition. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005279
$0.0005279$0.0005279
+0.99%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Federal Reserve’s Rate Cuts May Affect Cryptocurrency Market

Federal Reserve’s Rate Cuts May Affect Cryptocurrency Market

Detail: https://coincu.com/markets/federal-reserve-2025-rate-cut-plans/
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:40
Here’s why Polygon price is at risk of a 25% plunge

Here’s why Polygon price is at risk of a 25% plunge

Polygon price continued its freefall, reaching its lowest level since April 21, as the broader crypto sell-off gained momentum. Polygon (POL) dropped to $0.1915, down 32% from its highest point in May and 74% below its 2024 peak. The crash…
Share
Crypto.news2025/06/19 00:56