Steve Hanke questions Bitcoin's valuation amid market downturn. Bitcoin's recent price drop raises concerns. No primary analyst responses found to counter HankeSteve Hanke questions Bitcoin's valuation amid market downturn. Bitcoin's recent price drop raises concerns. No primary analyst responses found to counter Hanke

Bitcoin’s Fundamental Value Questioned Amid Price Fluctuations

Key Points:
  • Steve Hanke questions Bitcoin’s valuation amid market downturn.
  • Bitcoin’s recent price drop raises concerns.
  • No primary analyst responses found to counter Hanke’s claims.
bitcoins-value-debated-amid-volatility Bitcoin’s Value Debated Amid Volatility

Steve Hanke, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, asserted on December 16, 2025, that Bitcoin lacks fundamental value amid its price decline below $86,000.

Hanke’s statement reignites debates over Bitcoin’s value, potentially influencing market sentiment and investor decisions as the cryptocurrency continues experiencing volatility.

White House Advisor Refutes US Lag Behind China

China Meets U.S. Trade Commitments, Bessent Confirms

Bitcoin’s Value Debated Amid Volatility

Bitcoin’s value is in question following Steve Hanke’s claim of “zero fundamental value” as reported on December 16, 2025. The cryptocurrency’s price fell below $86,000, sparking debates over its speculative nature amid ongoing market volatility. Steve Hanke, a Professor of Applied Economics, stated on X (formerly Twitter) on December 16, 2025, that Bitcoin has “zero fundamental value” amid its price plunge below $86,000, calling it a “highly speculative investment devoid of fundamental worth.”

Market Reactions and Analyst Silence

Bitcoin’s price decline has prompted discussions among investors, as it recorded a 4% single-day loss, extending a four-day losing streak. The cryptocurrency trades below its October 2025 high, prompting concerns about its market stability. The financial implications of Bitcoin’s fluctuations are evident, influencing investor sentiment and market confidence. Criticisms from figures like Hanke add further pressure to the cryptocurrency’s perceived fundamental value in the financial arena.

Future Implications and Concerns

Despite the intense debates on Bitcoin’s fundamental worth, primary analyst responses have not been documented. The absence of rebuttals from prominent crypto figures underscores the current focus on Bitcoin’s intrinsic valuation concerns. Future outcomes for Bitcoin could depend on market trends and regulatory developments, shaping its role as a financial asset. Historical critiques suggest skepticism persists, and Bitcoin must weather technological and economic challenges to prove its true value.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims In a significant move for cryptocurrency security, Trust Wallet has committed
Share
bitcoinworld2025/12/26 17:40
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

CZ hinted at possible insider involvement in the Trust Wallet incident while assuring users that their funds would be reimbursed.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/12/26 16:48