TLDR A Baltimore jury awarded over $1.5 billion to Cherie Craft, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma after using Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder TheTLDR A Baltimore jury awarded over $1.5 billion to Cherie Craft, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma after using Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder The

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Stock: Jury Orders $1.5 Billion Payment in Talc Cancer Lawsuit

TLDR

  • A Baltimore jury awarded over $1.5 billion to Cherie Craft, who developed peritoneal mesothelioma after using Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder
  • The verdict includes $59.84 million in compensatory damages and $1.5 billion in punitive damages split between J&J and its subsidiary
  • Johnson & Johnson plans to appeal the decision, calling it “egregious” and “unconstitutional”
  • The company faces over 67,000 lawsuits related to talc products and cancer claims
  • J&J stopped selling talc-based baby powder in the U.S. in 2020 and globally in 2023

A Baltimore jury delivered a massive blow to Johnson & Johnson on Monday, ordering the healthcare giant and its subsidiaries to pay more than $1.5 billion to a single plaintiff in a talc cancer case. The verdict represents the largest-ever sum awarded against J&J for an individual plaintiff in these ongoing legal battles.

The Circuit Court for Baltimore City found J&J, two of its subsidiaries, and spinoff Kenvue liable for failing to warn Cherie Craft that its baby powder contained asbestos. Craft was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma in January 2024.


JNJ Stock Card
Johnson & Johnson, JNJ

The award breaks down to $59.84 million in compensatory damages and punitive damages totaling $1.5 billion. J&J received a $1 billion punitive damage assessment, while its subsidiary Pecos River Talc was hit with $500 million.

Company Maintains Products Are Safe

J&J wasted no time announcing its intention to appeal. Erik Haas, the company’s worldwide vice president of litigation, called the ruling “egregious” and “patently unconstitutional.” He argued the decision resulted from “gross errors” by the trial court.

This isn’t J&J’s first rodeo with large talc verdicts. Earlier in December, a California jury awarded $40 million to two women who blamed the company’s baby powder for their ovarian cancer.

The company faces a staggering backlog of over 67,000 lawsuits from plaintiffs claiming cancer diagnoses after using its baby powder and other talc products. J&J has consistently denied these allegations.

The company has tried to resolve the litigation through bankruptcy settlements worth billions. Courts have rejected those attempts.

J&J stopped selling talc-based baby powder in the United States in 2020. The company ended global sales in 2023, switching to cornstarch-based alternatives instead.

Many previous large awards against J&J in talc cases have been reduced or overturned on appeal. The company has set aside billions of dollars for litigation costs and settlements.

Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare cancer affecting the lining of the abdomen and abdominal organs. It’s most commonly linked to asbestos exposure. While no cure exists, treatments like surgery, chemotherapy, and palliative care can help manage symptoms.

The Maryland jury found J&J and Kenvue liable for failing to provide adequate warnings about potential asbestos content in their talc products.

The post Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Stock: Jury Orders $1.5 Billion Payment in Talc Cancer Lawsuit appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
1 Logo
1 Price(1)
$0.008647
$0.008647$0.008647
+10.29%
USD
1 (1) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
WazirX founder confirms that the Indian crypto exchange’s dispute with Binance has escalated to formal litigation

WazirX founder confirms that the Indian crypto exchange’s dispute with Binance has escalated to formal litigation

WazirX founder and CEO Nischal Shetty has confirmed that the Indian crypto exchange’s dispute with Binance has escalated to formal litigation. This has raised concerns
Share
Coinstats2025/12/27 05:45
WazirX founder Nischal Shetty says Binance ownership dispute now in litigation

WazirX founder Nischal Shetty says Binance ownership dispute now in litigation

The post WazirX founder Nischal Shetty says Binance ownership dispute now in litigation appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. WazirX founder and CEO Nischal Shetty
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/27 05:53