TLDR Lithuania will block websites of unlicensed crypto firms after December 31, 2025. Crypto firms must apply for MiCA licenses or face fines, website blockingTLDR Lithuania will block websites of unlicensed crypto firms after December 31, 2025. Crypto firms must apply for MiCA licenses or face fines, website blocking

Lithuania to Take Action Against Unlicensed Crypto Firms After December 31

TLDR

  • Lithuania will block websites of unlicensed crypto firms after December 31, 2025.
  • Crypto firms must apply for MiCA licenses or face fines, website blocking, or jail time.
  • Over 370 crypto firms are registered in Lithuania; only 30 applied for the new license.
  • Providers not applying for a MiCA license must wind down operations by year-end.

Starting January 1, 2026, crypto-asset service providers in Lithuania must secure a MiCA license or face severe legal consequences. With over 370 companies registered, only 120 are actively operating, and just 30 have applied for the necessary licensing. The Bank of Lithuania has warned firms to comply or wind down operations by December 31, 2025, or risk fines, website blocks, and even criminal charges. Time is running out for unlicensed providers.

Lithuania to Enforce Legal Action on Unlicensed Crypto Providers

The Bank of Lithuania has issued a clear warning to all crypto-asset service providers: after December 31, 2025, operating without a MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) license will be considered illegal. The move aligns with the European Union’s broader regulation to ensure better oversight and protection of investors within the crypto industry.

As the deadline approaches, businesses in Lithuania offering crypto services, including exchanges and wallet operators, face significant pressure to comply. Those who fail to secure a MiCA license will be subject to penalties, which may include hefty fines, website blocking, public warnings, and even criminal prosecution.

The Push for Compliance

The Bank of Lithuania has made it clear that any crypto firms planning to continue operations in the country must be licensed under the new MiCA framework. Firms that do not intend to apply for the license are being urged to wind down operations before the deadline. The central bank emphasized the importance of taking early action to ensure a smooth transition and safeguard investors.

The MiCA regulation was introduced to bring clearer legal structures to the crypto industry, addressing concerns about transparency, accountability, and investor protection. The shift aims to prevent any legal loopholes in the crypto ecosystem that could potentially harm consumers or undermine market integrity.

While Lithuania has seen significant growth in the crypto sector, with over 370 companies registered, only about 120 are actively operating, according to the latest data from the Bank of Lithuania. As of mid-July, just 30 firms had applied for the new MiCA license, signaling that many providers may still be unprepared or unwilling to comply.

Penalties for Non-Compliance

After January 1, 2026, any firm continuing to operate without the required MiCA license will face serious legal consequences. These sanctions could range from fines and blocked websites to potential criminal charges. The penalties include the possibility of imprisonment for up to four years for individuals involved in illegal crypto operations.

The authorities have also indicated that they will be closely monitoring crypto companies, with the power to issue public warnings and pursue legal action if necessary. The Bank of Lithuania has made it clear that the aim of these measures is to ensure that firms operating in the crypto sector are following legal frameworks that protect investors and promote transparency.

Operational Challenges and Customer Communications

For those firms that decide to cease operations, it is critical to communicate effectively with customers. Providers are encouraged to offer clear instructions on how to withdraw or transfer funds and crypto-assets. Firms must also explain the process for exchanging crypto-assets for funds held with a custodian to ensure a seamless transition for their clients.

The central bank has also advised operators to provide specific timelines and instructions to customers regarding the closure of services. This will help prevent confusion and potential issues for investors who may be impacted by the transition. Providers that fail to clearly communicate these steps risk further penalties and damage to their reputation.

A Critical Transition for Lithuania’s Crypto Industry

With just under a year remaining before the deadline, the pressure is mounting on crypto firms in Lithuania to ensure compliance with MiCA licensing requirements. As the country moves to tighten its regulatory framework, businesses that fail to meet the new standards face the risk of being shut down or penalized. These measures aim to provide greater clarity and security in the crypto market, aligning Lithuania’s regulatory approach with European Union-wide standards.

While many firms may struggle to meet these demands, the Bank of Lithuania remains firm in its stance. The authorities emphasize that these changes are necessary to protect investors, ensure transparency, and promote the responsible growth of the crypto market in Lithuania.

The post Lithuania to Take Action Against Unlicensed Crypto Firms After December 31 appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Overtake Logo
Overtake Price(TAKE)
$0.31203
$0.31203$0.31203
-1.53%
USD
Overtake (TAKE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims

BitcoinWorld Trust Wallet’s Decisive Move: Full Compensation for $7M Hack Victims In a significant move for cryptocurrency security, Trust Wallet has committed
Share
bitcoinworld2025/12/26 17:40
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

Trust Wallet Hack Hits $7M: CZ Hints at Possible Insider Role

CZ hinted at possible insider involvement in the Trust Wallet incident while assuring users that their funds would be reimbursed.
Share
CryptoPotato2025/12/26 16:48