2025 has shaped up to be a defining year for the emerging digital asset treasury movement, widely referred to as DATs. Research indicates that more than 100 publicly traded firms have embraced the DAT strategy, with a significant portion of them in the biotech sector—a field grappling with financial headwinds this year. Biotech’s Crypto Play: […]2025 has shaped up to be a defining year for the emerging digital asset treasury movement, widely referred to as DATs. Research indicates that more than 100 publicly traded firms have embraced the DAT strategy, with a significant portion of them in the biotech sector—a field grappling with financial headwinds this year. Biotech’s Crypto Play: […]

The DAT Shift: What’s Pulling Biotech Firms Into the Crypto Treasury Game?

2025 has shaped up to be a defining year for the emerging digital asset treasury movement, widely referred to as DATs. Research indicates that more than 100 publicly traded firms have embraced the DAT strategy, with a significant portion of them in the biotech sector—a field grappling with financial headwinds this year.

Biotech’s Crypto Play: Why Are so Many Firms Turning to DATs?

DATs have gained traction this year, with research showing that out of more than 100 public firms announcing and implementing these strategies, at least 20 are biotech companies. A biotech (biotechnology) company typically harnesses living organisms, biological systems, or their derivatives to create products and technologies designed to enhance human health, agriculture, manufacturing, and the environment.

Most often, the term is used to describe companies centered on human health and medicine. Figures reveal that the biotech sector has faced ongoing underperformance since 2024, leaving many investors frustrated. As a result, funding—particularly for early-stage and mid-sized biotech firms—remains extremely limited. To adapt, companies have placed a strong emphasis on operational discipline, cash management, and scenario planning to navigate the downturn.

The DAT Shift: What’s Pulling Biotech Firms Into the Crypto Treasury Game?Screenshot from a January 2025 Wisdomtree report about the biotech industry written by the firm’s Global Head of Research, Christopher Gannatti, CFA.

One such scenario is the DAT strategy. A notable example is 180 Life Sciences, a clinical-stage biotech firm developing innovative treatments for inflammatory diseases, fibrosis, and pain. This year, the company announced a major pivot, unveiling plans to adopt a digital asset treasury approach and rebrand as ETHzilla Corporation, signaling a shift toward crypto assets while still retaining elements of its biotech portfolio.

Data from strategicethreserve.xyz shows that ETHzilla ranks as the fifth-largest ETH treasury holder. A large slew of other biotech firms have also leaned into the DAT movement, including Acurx Pharmaceuticals with a BTC treasury, Artelo Biosciences with SOL, Atai Life Sciences with BTC, Bridge Biotherapeutics with BTC, Cosmos Health Inc. with ETH, Enlivex Therapeutics with BTC, Eyenovia with HYPE, and Hoth Therapeutics with BTC.

In addition, companies such as LIXTE Biotechnology Holdings, MEI Pharma, Windtree Therapeutics, and Portage Biotech—now rebranded as AlphaTON—have joined the roster of biotechs exploring this strategy among several more. The biotech sector’s pivot toward DAT strategies signals a broader change in how firms are handling tight funding and stalled markets.

For some, it may reflect a fight for survival, while others are threading digital assets into their treasuries as a bold step away from traditional finance (TradFi). This wave may also reflect opportunism, with firms chasing 2025’s crypto balance sheet or DAT hype to rebrand and draw eyes rather than fix core flaws. If crypto asset markets slip, these bets could leave companies on shakier ground.

It remains unclear why so many biotech firms have pivoted toward DAT strategies—whether out of necessity or simple experimentation. What is clear, however, is that the crypto community has embraced each new entrant, treating every addition to the DAT roster as a validation of the ongoing trend.

Market Opportunity
PlaysOut Logo
PlaysOut Price(PLAY)
$0.0495
$0.0495$0.0495
+1.62%
USD
PlaysOut (PLAY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Federal Reserve’s Rate Cuts May Affect Cryptocurrency Market

Federal Reserve’s Rate Cuts May Affect Cryptocurrency Market

Detail: https://coincu.com/markets/federal-reserve-2025-rate-cut-plans/
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 02:40
Here’s why Polygon price is at risk of a 25% plunge

Here’s why Polygon price is at risk of a 25% plunge

Polygon price continued its freefall, reaching its lowest level since April 21, as the broader crypto sell-off gained momentum. Polygon (POL) dropped to $0.1915, down 32% from its highest point in May and 74% below its 2024 peak. The crash…
Share
Crypto.news2025/06/19 00:56