TLDRs; China’s car dealers face mounting losses as online auto sales surge and price wars squeeze margins. Dealer sales dropped 10% in 2025 after an 18% fall in 2024, signaling structural weakness. Tight financing and slow turnover have left many dealers struggling to stay solvent. Ecommerce platforms and direct sales are redefining how Chinese consumers [...] The post Price Wars and Ecommerce Crush China’s Traditional Car Dealers appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDRs; China’s car dealers face mounting losses as online auto sales surge and price wars squeeze margins. Dealer sales dropped 10% in 2025 after an 18% fall in 2024, signaling structural weakness. Tight financing and slow turnover have left many dealers struggling to stay solvent. Ecommerce platforms and direct sales are redefining how Chinese consumers [...] The post Price Wars and Ecommerce Crush China’s Traditional Car Dealers appeared first on CoinCentral.

Price Wars and Ecommerce Crush China’s Traditional Car Dealers

2025/10/13 01:30
4 min read

TLDRs;

  • China’s car dealers face mounting losses as online auto sales surge and price wars squeeze margins.
  • Dealer sales dropped 10% in 2025 after an 18% fall in 2024, signaling structural weakness.
  • Tight financing and slow turnover have left many dealers struggling to stay solvent.
  • Ecommerce platforms and direct sales are redefining how Chinese consumers buy cars.

China’s once-powerful network of car dealerships is reeling from an unprecedented combination of price wars, evaporating profits, and the rapid rise of online auto sales.

As automakers pivot toward digital platforms and direct-to-consumer models, traditional dealers, long the backbone of China’s car retail ecosystem, are being left behind.

According to data from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA), sales among 14 major dealership groups fell 10% in the first half of 2025, following an 18% slump in 2024. What began as a cyclical slowdown now appears to have become a structural shift that’s reshaping how Chinese consumers buy cars.

Cui Dongshu, CPCA’s general secretary, said the trend is unsustainable.

His comments underscore growing alarm that China’s traditional sales channels may not survive in their current form.

Price War Pushes Dealers to the Edge

The current crisis has been exacerbated by an ongoing price war among automakers, as brands slash prices to maintain market share amid slowing consumer demand. Major manufacturers have engaged in deep discounting, compressing margins throughout the value chain and leaving dealers with little room to breathe.

Car prices across China have dropped sharply since early 2024, with some electric vehicle makers offering discounts as high as 20% on certain models. While the aggressive pricing helped boost online traffic, it decimated dealer profitability.

Most dealerships rely heavily on floorplan financing, short-term loans used to purchase vehicle inventory. When cars fail to sell quickly, these loans pile up interest and increase liquidity pressure. With weak turnover and negative cash flow, many dealers are finding it harder to service their debts.

Banks Pull Back, Non-Bank Lenders Step In

Facing escalating risks, Chinese banks have grown cautious in lending to dealerships. In response, the CPCA has urged financial institutions to extend a “lifeline” to the sector, warning that a wave of bankruptcies could sweep through the industry if no support arrives.

However, mainstream banks remain reluctant. The gap is being filled by specialized non-bank lenders, finance companies that offer credit backed by tighter collateral controls or real-time inventory tracking. These players are leveraging technology to monitor car stocks, helping mitigate default risks in a volatile market.

In parallel, new B2B liquidation platforms have emerged to offload aged or slow-moving inventory. These digital marketplaces connect struggling dealers with secondary buyers and alternative sales channels, providing quick liquidity at the cost of transaction fees that scale with urgency.

Ecommerce Reshapes the Auto Landscape

At the heart of this transformation is the ecommerce revolution. Automakers are increasingly bypassing traditional dealerships and selling vehicles directly through their websites or major online platforms such as JD.com and Alibaba’s Tmall. Consumers, now accustomed to browsing cars online, can reserve, customize, and even complete purchases without ever visiting a showroom.

This digital shift has eroded the relevance of the traditional “four-in-one” dealer model, covering sales, after-sales service, spare parts, and insurance. Out of roughly 30,000 dealerships across China, industry analysts warn that many could close within the next two years if current trends continue.

Still, a few innovative dealers are trying to adapt by transforming showrooms into hybrid digital experience centers and integrating ecommerce partnerships. Yet even those efforts may not offset the sheer scale of structural disruption underway.

The post Price Wars and Ecommerce Crush China’s Traditional Car Dealers appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00