Author: JAE The DeFi market has surpassed $150 billion in size, but the overcollateralization model still limits its penetration into broader lending areas. Uncollateralized lending remains one of the directions the DeFi market is actively exploring, but various protocols have failed along the way. Recently, 3Jane, a rising star in unsecured lending, announced that it expects to launch its mainnet in early November. As an unsecured lending protocol backed by leading crypto VC Paradigm, 3Jane represents another significant step for Paradigm in the lending sector, attracting widespread market attention. The DeFi collateralized lending model may be reaching a turning point. 3Jane positions itself as a "credit-based peer-to-peer pooled money market," aiming to provide algorithm-driven, real-time uncollateralized USDC credit lines to those unable to meet overcollateralization requirements. 3Jane has a clear customer profile, explicitly encompassing not only ordinary crypto investors but also liquidity miners, traders, arbitrageurs, enterprises, and AI agents. This target customer group indicates that 3Jane has positioned itself from the outset in a high-turnover, high-capital-efficiency institutional-grade credit market. The essence of unsecured lending is that lenders must bear the credit risk of borrowers. In traditional finance, such businesses typically require borrowers to undergo rigorous KYC (Know Your Customer)/AML (Anti-Money Laundering)/CDD (Due Diligence) and credit assessments. However, the permissionless and anonymous nature championed by DeFi contradicts KYC/AML requirements. Therefore, if DeFi unsecured lending is to achieve large-scale commercialization, especially in acquiring institutional funding at the $50 million level, it must balance the contradiction between the spirit of decentralization and regulatory compliance requirements. In its early stages, lenders can mint USD3 on 3Jane by depositing USDC, or by staking USDC/USD3 into the protocol to mint sUSD3, earning up to 27% APY. To date, over $7 million in credit lines on 3Jane are backed by approximately $83.1 million in verified assets. For borrowers, 3Jane limits its scope to U.S. residents with total assets exceeding $150,000, with an initial lending limit of approximately $50 million. This restriction is primarily due to the need for asset verification to determine credit limits and to screen qualified borrowers to mitigate risk. The requirement for borrowers to be U.S. residents also facilitates future debt collection. The protocol's access mechanism directly addresses the SEC's (Securities and Exchange Commission) regulatory requirements for "accredited investors." While the definition of an accredited investor typically requires net assets exceeding $1 million, 3Jane's entry threshold and its nationality requirements demonstrate the protocol's emphasis on compliance. From the outset, the product design limits users to a specific group that meets KYC and asset thresholds, thereby minimizing regulatory risks. For 3Jane, the prerequisite for its closed-loop business model is no longer just how accurate its technical risk control model is, but more importantly, whether it can meet the stringent regulatory requirements of institutional investors. This means that 3Jane needs to prove that it is a protocol with a verifiable compliance layer in order to attract its target audience to the DeFi market. 3Jane builds a user credit graph to create a "privacy compliance stack". Jacob Chudnovsky, founder of 3Jane, admitted that previous uncollateralized lending protocols in the crypto market had all failed due to a lack of sound credit underwriting mechanisms and legal recourse, and because a large number of transactions occurred off-chain. To address the challenges of risk control and compliance in uncollateralized lending, the protocol created a new technological architecture by combining the 3Jane Credit Risk Algorithm (3CA) with the zkTLS protocol. 3CA is used to capture user interaction data across DeFi, CEXs (centralized exchanges), and traditional banks, using it as part of credit assessment. 3CA underwrites credit limits based on a user's Jane Score and asset type. The Jane Score is a user's credit score on the 3Jane protocol, composed of both on-chain and off-chain creditworthiness. The on-chain Jane Score is fed by Cred Score and Blockchain Bureau Score, both protocols that have established credit assessment frameworks based on user on-chain behavior; the off-chain score integrates VantageScore 3.0 from TransUnion and Equifax (two of the three major US credit agencies) as data sources. Furthermore, the Jane Score includes default penalty mechanisms, deterring bad actors by restricting access and increasing interest rates. In short, Jane Score will comprehensively assess users' credit risk from both on-chain and off-chain perspectives. If a user attempts to borrow from the protocol by artificially inflating their asset value through external borrowing or transfers, this behavior will be collected and scored by Jane Score. For new users with limited past on-chain or off-chain borrowing activity, their initial credit score will not be high, and the credit limit issued by the protocol will be controlled within a manageable range to prevent serious bad debts due to lending large amounts of assets. In addition, 3Jane places great emphasis on compliance, and after the agreement is finalized, the credit data of defaulting users may be fed back to off-chain credit institutions to constrain user behavior. 3CA's cross-domain data inputs have helped the protocol build a "credit graph" that transcends a single on-chain dimension. Through Jane Score, 3Jane has also shifted the credit risk assessment of lending behavior from reliance on over-collateralization (asset value) to an uncollateralized (user credit) model, which is the foundation supporting the protocol in issuing credit to complex entities such as enterprises and AI agents. 3CA's assessment of user credit relies on obtaining user behavior data across Web2 and Web3, which contradicts the need to protect user privacy. 3Jane then introduced the zkTLS (Zero-Knowledge TLS) protocol to overcome this "privacy compliance paradox." zkTLS acts as a cryptographic bridge built using zero-knowledge proof technology. It allows borrowers to connect to financial data in the Web2 world, such as bank accounts or CEX accounts connected via Plaid, and to privately generate proofs to verify a user's repayment ability or asset ownership, without disclosing sensitive data to 3Jane or any third party. zkTLS's value proposition lies in providing compliance verification in the form of "zero-knowledge proofs." For regulated financial institutions, the core requirements of KYC/AML include customer identification, identity verification, and due diligence on the authenticity of transactions. zkTLS can complete these due diligence steps while ensuring user privacy, thus fulfilling its regulatory responsibilities. This technological innovation has significantly enhanced 3Jane's attractiveness to compliant institutional funding. Paradigm bets on "compliant" DeFi On June 4th, 3Jane secured $5.2 million in seed funding led by top venture capital firm Paradigm. This investment not only provides financial support but also strongly endorses Paradigm's commitment to building a "scalable, compliant, crypto-native credit infrastructure." In reality, Paradigm's investment in 3Jane is a bet on a DeFi blueprint that aligns with regulatory trends and possesses institutional-grade access capabilities. The success of 3Jane's institutionalization strategy heavily depends on Paradigm's frequent communication with the SEC to ensure regulatory support. Paradigm's regulatory lobbying efforts aim to address key compliance hurdles currently facing the crypto market, particularly in the integration of traditional finance and DeFi. Their lobbying work is also a crucial strategic asset for 3Jane in attracting institutional funding from a compliance standpoint. Custody is one of the biggest bottlenecks for institutional funds entering DeFi. SAB 121 (SEC Employee Accounting Announcement No. 121) requires financial institutions to list custodied client crypto assets as liabilities on their balance sheets. This requirement forces custodians to incur unnecessary expenses, deterring traditional financial institutions such as banks and trust companies and significantly limiting the number of qualified custodians. Paradigm believes that SAB 121 is essentially stifling industry growth and therefore has requested the SEC to rescind SAB 121. Following industry lobbying, SAB 121 was revoked by the SEC in January 2025, significantly lowering the custodian threshold for institutions. For 3Jane, the revocation of SAB 121 serves as a "liquidity gateway" paved by Paradigm. Enterprises are one of 3Jane's target customer groups, and these institutional users require qualified custodian services. Now that SAB 121 is revoked, institutions can compliantly deposit larger sums of money into the protocol to meet a $50 million credit requirement, ensuring 3Jane has a stable and compliant source of funding. Paradigm's regulatory lobbying efforts have created more reliable conditions for institutional entry into 3Jane, making 3Jane's technological compliance advantages more commercially viable. Against the backdrop of traditional financial institutions seeking to simultaneously meet KYC/AML and on-chain efficiency requirements, 3Jane may offer a feasible and institutionally friendly compliant DeFi model. The strategic collaboration between 3Jane and Paradigm also indicates that DeFi is shifting from serving crypto-native users to the broader traditional credit market, especially the trillion-dollar corporate and trade credit sectors. Once the most challenging credit assessment and compliance issues in uncollateralized lending are effectively resolved by 3CA and zkTLS, DeFi may be able to support the entire product line of traditional finance, freeing itself from the constraints of over-collateralization. At that time, DeFi will not only retain the high efficiency of decentralization, but will also achieve the accountability required by regulations. The mainnet launch in early November will test whether 3Jane can leverage the massive credit liquidity of traditional finance amidst the wave of compliance. However, investors should still pay close attention to 3Jane's credit risk. While the current probability of default is low, expanding its target customer base to businesses and AI agents could amplify the risk should an economic recession occur. If mismanaged, unsecured lending could repeat the mistakes of traditional finance; therefore, investors also need to monitor the effectiveness of recourse mechanisms, such as collection and legal auctions.Author: JAE The DeFi market has surpassed $150 billion in size, but the overcollateralization model still limits its penetration into broader lending areas. Uncollateralized lending remains one of the directions the DeFi market is actively exploring, but various protocols have failed along the way. Recently, 3Jane, a rising star in unsecured lending, announced that it expects to launch its mainnet in early November. As an unsecured lending protocol backed by leading crypto VC Paradigm, 3Jane represents another significant step for Paradigm in the lending sector, attracting widespread market attention. The DeFi collateralized lending model may be reaching a turning point. 3Jane positions itself as a "credit-based peer-to-peer pooled money market," aiming to provide algorithm-driven, real-time uncollateralized USDC credit lines to those unable to meet overcollateralization requirements. 3Jane has a clear customer profile, explicitly encompassing not only ordinary crypto investors but also liquidity miners, traders, arbitrageurs, enterprises, and AI agents. This target customer group indicates that 3Jane has positioned itself from the outset in a high-turnover, high-capital-efficiency institutional-grade credit market. The essence of unsecured lending is that lenders must bear the credit risk of borrowers. In traditional finance, such businesses typically require borrowers to undergo rigorous KYC (Know Your Customer)/AML (Anti-Money Laundering)/CDD (Due Diligence) and credit assessments. However, the permissionless and anonymous nature championed by DeFi contradicts KYC/AML requirements. Therefore, if DeFi unsecured lending is to achieve large-scale commercialization, especially in acquiring institutional funding at the $50 million level, it must balance the contradiction between the spirit of decentralization and regulatory compliance requirements. In its early stages, lenders can mint USD3 on 3Jane by depositing USDC, or by staking USDC/USD3 into the protocol to mint sUSD3, earning up to 27% APY. To date, over $7 million in credit lines on 3Jane are backed by approximately $83.1 million in verified assets. For borrowers, 3Jane limits its scope to U.S. residents with total assets exceeding $150,000, with an initial lending limit of approximately $50 million. This restriction is primarily due to the need for asset verification to determine credit limits and to screen qualified borrowers to mitigate risk. The requirement for borrowers to be U.S. residents also facilitates future debt collection. The protocol's access mechanism directly addresses the SEC's (Securities and Exchange Commission) regulatory requirements for "accredited investors." While the definition of an accredited investor typically requires net assets exceeding $1 million, 3Jane's entry threshold and its nationality requirements demonstrate the protocol's emphasis on compliance. From the outset, the product design limits users to a specific group that meets KYC and asset thresholds, thereby minimizing regulatory risks. For 3Jane, the prerequisite for its closed-loop business model is no longer just how accurate its technical risk control model is, but more importantly, whether it can meet the stringent regulatory requirements of institutional investors. This means that 3Jane needs to prove that it is a protocol with a verifiable compliance layer in order to attract its target audience to the DeFi market. 3Jane builds a user credit graph to create a "privacy compliance stack". Jacob Chudnovsky, founder of 3Jane, admitted that previous uncollateralized lending protocols in the crypto market had all failed due to a lack of sound credit underwriting mechanisms and legal recourse, and because a large number of transactions occurred off-chain. To address the challenges of risk control and compliance in uncollateralized lending, the protocol created a new technological architecture by combining the 3Jane Credit Risk Algorithm (3CA) with the zkTLS protocol. 3CA is used to capture user interaction data across DeFi, CEXs (centralized exchanges), and traditional banks, using it as part of credit assessment. 3CA underwrites credit limits based on a user's Jane Score and asset type. The Jane Score is a user's credit score on the 3Jane protocol, composed of both on-chain and off-chain creditworthiness. The on-chain Jane Score is fed by Cred Score and Blockchain Bureau Score, both protocols that have established credit assessment frameworks based on user on-chain behavior; the off-chain score integrates VantageScore 3.0 from TransUnion and Equifax (two of the three major US credit agencies) as data sources. Furthermore, the Jane Score includes default penalty mechanisms, deterring bad actors by restricting access and increasing interest rates. In short, Jane Score will comprehensively assess users' credit risk from both on-chain and off-chain perspectives. If a user attempts to borrow from the protocol by artificially inflating their asset value through external borrowing or transfers, this behavior will be collected and scored by Jane Score. For new users with limited past on-chain or off-chain borrowing activity, their initial credit score will not be high, and the credit limit issued by the protocol will be controlled within a manageable range to prevent serious bad debts due to lending large amounts of assets. In addition, 3Jane places great emphasis on compliance, and after the agreement is finalized, the credit data of defaulting users may be fed back to off-chain credit institutions to constrain user behavior. 3CA's cross-domain data inputs have helped the protocol build a "credit graph" that transcends a single on-chain dimension. Through Jane Score, 3Jane has also shifted the credit risk assessment of lending behavior from reliance on over-collateralization (asset value) to an uncollateralized (user credit) model, which is the foundation supporting the protocol in issuing credit to complex entities such as enterprises and AI agents. 3CA's assessment of user credit relies on obtaining user behavior data across Web2 and Web3, which contradicts the need to protect user privacy. 3Jane then introduced the zkTLS (Zero-Knowledge TLS) protocol to overcome this "privacy compliance paradox." zkTLS acts as a cryptographic bridge built using zero-knowledge proof technology. It allows borrowers to connect to financial data in the Web2 world, such as bank accounts or CEX accounts connected via Plaid, and to privately generate proofs to verify a user's repayment ability or asset ownership, without disclosing sensitive data to 3Jane or any third party. zkTLS's value proposition lies in providing compliance verification in the form of "zero-knowledge proofs." For regulated financial institutions, the core requirements of KYC/AML include customer identification, identity verification, and due diligence on the authenticity of transactions. zkTLS can complete these due diligence steps while ensuring user privacy, thus fulfilling its regulatory responsibilities. This technological innovation has significantly enhanced 3Jane's attractiveness to compliant institutional funding. Paradigm bets on "compliant" DeFi On June 4th, 3Jane secured $5.2 million in seed funding led by top venture capital firm Paradigm. This investment not only provides financial support but also strongly endorses Paradigm's commitment to building a "scalable, compliant, crypto-native credit infrastructure." In reality, Paradigm's investment in 3Jane is a bet on a DeFi blueprint that aligns with regulatory trends and possesses institutional-grade access capabilities. The success of 3Jane's institutionalization strategy heavily depends on Paradigm's frequent communication with the SEC to ensure regulatory support. Paradigm's regulatory lobbying efforts aim to address key compliance hurdles currently facing the crypto market, particularly in the integration of traditional finance and DeFi. Their lobbying work is also a crucial strategic asset for 3Jane in attracting institutional funding from a compliance standpoint. Custody is one of the biggest bottlenecks for institutional funds entering DeFi. SAB 121 (SEC Employee Accounting Announcement No. 121) requires financial institutions to list custodied client crypto assets as liabilities on their balance sheets. This requirement forces custodians to incur unnecessary expenses, deterring traditional financial institutions such as banks and trust companies and significantly limiting the number of qualified custodians. Paradigm believes that SAB 121 is essentially stifling industry growth and therefore has requested the SEC to rescind SAB 121. Following industry lobbying, SAB 121 was revoked by the SEC in January 2025, significantly lowering the custodian threshold for institutions. For 3Jane, the revocation of SAB 121 serves as a "liquidity gateway" paved by Paradigm. Enterprises are one of 3Jane's target customer groups, and these institutional users require qualified custodian services. Now that SAB 121 is revoked, institutions can compliantly deposit larger sums of money into the protocol to meet a $50 million credit requirement, ensuring 3Jane has a stable and compliant source of funding. Paradigm's regulatory lobbying efforts have created more reliable conditions for institutional entry into 3Jane, making 3Jane's technological compliance advantages more commercially viable. Against the backdrop of traditional financial institutions seeking to simultaneously meet KYC/AML and on-chain efficiency requirements, 3Jane may offer a feasible and institutionally friendly compliant DeFi model. The strategic collaboration between 3Jane and Paradigm also indicates that DeFi is shifting from serving crypto-native users to the broader traditional credit market, especially the trillion-dollar corporate and trade credit sectors. Once the most challenging credit assessment and compliance issues in uncollateralized lending are effectively resolved by 3CA and zkTLS, DeFi may be able to support the entire product line of traditional finance, freeing itself from the constraints of over-collateralization. At that time, DeFi will not only retain the high efficiency of decentralization, but will also achieve the accountability required by regulations. The mainnet launch in early November will test whether 3Jane can leverage the massive credit liquidity of traditional finance amidst the wave of compliance. However, investors should still pay close attention to 3Jane's credit risk. While the current probability of default is low, expanding its target customer base to businesses and AI agents could amplify the risk should an economic recession occur. If mismanaged, unsecured lending could repeat the mistakes of traditional finance; therefore, investors also need to monitor the effectiveness of recourse mechanisms, such as collection and legal auctions.

Paradigm leads the bet: How will 3Jane unlock the trillion-dollar DeFi unsecured lending market?

2025/10/31 14:50
8 min read

Author: JAE

The DeFi market has surpassed $150 billion in size, but the overcollateralization model still limits its penetration into broader lending areas. Uncollateralized lending remains one of the directions the DeFi market is actively exploring, but various protocols have failed along the way.

Recently, 3Jane, a rising star in unsecured lending, announced that it expects to launch its mainnet in early November. As an unsecured lending protocol backed by leading crypto VC Paradigm, 3Jane represents another significant step for Paradigm in the lending sector, attracting widespread market attention.

The DeFi collateralized lending model may be reaching a turning point.

3Jane positions itself as a "credit-based peer-to-peer pooled money market," aiming to provide algorithm-driven, real-time uncollateralized USDC credit lines to those unable to meet overcollateralization requirements. 3Jane has a clear customer profile, explicitly encompassing not only ordinary crypto investors but also liquidity miners, traders, arbitrageurs, enterprises, and AI agents. This target customer group indicates that 3Jane has positioned itself from the outset in a high-turnover, high-capital-efficiency institutional-grade credit market.

The essence of unsecured lending is that lenders must bear the credit risk of borrowers. In traditional finance, such businesses typically require borrowers to undergo rigorous KYC (Know Your Customer)/AML (Anti-Money Laundering)/CDD (Due Diligence) and credit assessments. However, the permissionless and anonymous nature championed by DeFi contradicts KYC/AML requirements. Therefore, if DeFi unsecured lending is to achieve large-scale commercialization, especially in acquiring institutional funding at the $50 million level, it must balance the contradiction between the spirit of decentralization and regulatory compliance requirements.

In its early stages, lenders can mint USD3 on 3Jane by depositing USDC, or by staking USDC/USD3 into the protocol to mint sUSD3, earning up to 27% APY. To date, over $7 million in credit lines on 3Jane are backed by approximately $83.1 million in verified assets.

For borrowers, 3Jane limits its scope to U.S. residents with total assets exceeding $150,000, with an initial lending limit of approximately $50 million. This restriction is primarily due to the need for asset verification to determine credit limits and to screen qualified borrowers to mitigate risk. The requirement for borrowers to be U.S. residents also facilitates future debt collection.

The protocol's access mechanism directly addresses the SEC's (Securities and Exchange Commission) regulatory requirements for "accredited investors." While the definition of an accredited investor typically requires net assets exceeding $1 million, 3Jane's entry threshold and its nationality requirements demonstrate the protocol's emphasis on compliance. From the outset, the product design limits users to a specific group that meets KYC and asset thresholds, thereby minimizing regulatory risks.

For 3Jane, the prerequisite for its closed-loop business model is no longer just how accurate its technical risk control model is, but more importantly, whether it can meet the stringent regulatory requirements of institutional investors. This means that 3Jane needs to prove that it is a protocol with a verifiable compliance layer in order to attract its target audience to the DeFi market.

3Jane builds a user credit graph to create a "privacy compliance stack".

Jacob Chudnovsky, founder of 3Jane, admitted that previous uncollateralized lending protocols in the crypto market had all failed due to a lack of sound credit underwriting mechanisms and legal recourse, and because a large number of transactions occurred off-chain. To address the challenges of risk control and compliance in uncollateralized lending, the protocol created a new technological architecture by combining the 3Jane Credit Risk Algorithm (3CA) with the zkTLS protocol.

3CA is used to capture user interaction data across DeFi, CEXs (centralized exchanges), and traditional banks, using it as part of credit assessment. 3CA underwrites credit limits based on a user's Jane Score and asset type. The Jane Score is a user's credit score on the 3Jane protocol, composed of both on-chain and off-chain creditworthiness. The on-chain Jane Score is fed by Cred Score and Blockchain Bureau Score, both protocols that have established credit assessment frameworks based on user on-chain behavior; the off-chain score integrates VantageScore 3.0 from TransUnion and Equifax (two of the three major US credit agencies) as data sources. Furthermore, the Jane Score includes default penalty mechanisms, deterring bad actors by restricting access and increasing interest rates.

In short, Jane Score will comprehensively assess users' credit risk from both on-chain and off-chain perspectives. If a user attempts to borrow from the protocol by artificially inflating their asset value through external borrowing or transfers, this behavior will be collected and scored by Jane Score. For new users with limited past on-chain or off-chain borrowing activity, their initial credit score will not be high, and the credit limit issued by the protocol will be controlled within a manageable range to prevent serious bad debts due to lending large amounts of assets.

In addition, 3Jane places great emphasis on compliance, and after the agreement is finalized, the credit data of defaulting users may be fed back to off-chain credit institutions to constrain user behavior.

3CA's cross-domain data inputs have helped the protocol build a "credit graph" that transcends a single on-chain dimension. Through Jane Score, 3Jane has also shifted the credit risk assessment of lending behavior from reliance on over-collateralization (asset value) to an uncollateralized (user credit) model, which is the foundation supporting the protocol in issuing credit to complex entities such as enterprises and AI agents.

3CA's assessment of user credit relies on obtaining user behavior data across Web2 and Web3, which contradicts the need to protect user privacy. 3Jane then introduced the zkTLS (Zero-Knowledge TLS) protocol to overcome this "privacy compliance paradox."

zkTLS acts as a cryptographic bridge built using zero-knowledge proof technology. It allows borrowers to connect to financial data in the Web2 world, such as bank accounts or CEX accounts connected via Plaid, and to privately generate proofs to verify a user's repayment ability or asset ownership, without disclosing sensitive data to 3Jane or any third party.

zkTLS's value proposition lies in providing compliance verification in the form of "zero-knowledge proofs." For regulated financial institutions, the core requirements of KYC/AML include customer identification, identity verification, and due diligence on the authenticity of transactions. zkTLS can complete these due diligence steps while ensuring user privacy, thus fulfilling its regulatory responsibilities. This technological innovation has significantly enhanced 3Jane's attractiveness to compliant institutional funding.

Paradigm bets on "compliant" DeFi

On June 4th, 3Jane secured $5.2 million in seed funding led by top venture capital firm Paradigm. This investment not only provides financial support but also strongly endorses Paradigm's commitment to building a "scalable, compliant, crypto-native credit infrastructure."

In reality, Paradigm's investment in 3Jane is a bet on a DeFi blueprint that aligns with regulatory trends and possesses institutional-grade access capabilities. The success of 3Jane's institutionalization strategy heavily depends on Paradigm's frequent communication with the SEC to ensure regulatory support.

Paradigm's regulatory lobbying efforts aim to address key compliance hurdles currently facing the crypto market, particularly in the integration of traditional finance and DeFi. Their lobbying work is also a crucial strategic asset for 3Jane in attracting institutional funding from a compliance standpoint.

Custody is one of the biggest bottlenecks for institutional funds entering DeFi. SAB 121 (SEC Employee Accounting Announcement No. 121) requires financial institutions to list custodied client crypto assets as liabilities on their balance sheets.

This requirement forces custodians to incur unnecessary expenses, deterring traditional financial institutions such as banks and trust companies and significantly limiting the number of qualified custodians. Paradigm believes that SAB 121 is essentially stifling industry growth and therefore has requested the SEC to rescind SAB 121.

Following industry lobbying, SAB 121 was revoked by the SEC in January 2025, significantly lowering the custodian threshold for institutions. For 3Jane, the revocation of SAB 121 serves as a "liquidity gateway" paved by Paradigm. Enterprises are one of 3Jane's target customer groups, and these institutional users require qualified custodian services. Now that SAB 121 is revoked, institutions can compliantly deposit larger sums of money into the protocol to meet a $50 million credit requirement, ensuring 3Jane has a stable and compliant source of funding.

Paradigm's regulatory lobbying efforts have created more reliable conditions for institutional entry into 3Jane, making 3Jane's technological compliance advantages more commercially viable. Against the backdrop of traditional financial institutions seeking to simultaneously meet KYC/AML and on-chain efficiency requirements, 3Jane may offer a feasible and institutionally friendly compliant DeFi model.

The strategic collaboration between 3Jane and Paradigm also indicates that DeFi is shifting from serving crypto-native users to the broader traditional credit market, especially the trillion-dollar corporate and trade credit sectors. Once the most challenging credit assessment and compliance issues in uncollateralized lending are effectively resolved by 3CA and zkTLS, DeFi may be able to support the entire product line of traditional finance, freeing itself from the constraints of over-collateralization.

At that time, DeFi will not only retain the high efficiency of decentralization, but will also achieve the accountability required by regulations. The mainnet launch in early November will test whether 3Jane can leverage the massive credit liquidity of traditional finance amidst the wave of compliance.

However, investors should still pay close attention to 3Jane's credit risk. While the current probability of default is low, expanding its target customer base to businesses and AI agents could amplify the risk should an economic recession occur. If mismanaged, unsecured lending could repeat the mistakes of traditional finance; therefore, investors also need to monitor the effectiveness of recourse mechanisms, such as collection and legal auctions.

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000328
$0.000328$0.000328
-0.30%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00