The post NASA Reviews SpaceX and Blue Origin Plans for Accelerated Lunar Missions Against China appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 💹 Trade with pro tools Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🚀 Smooth orders, clear control Advanced order types and market depth in one view. 👉 Create account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 📈 Clarity in volatile markets Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline. 👉 Sign up → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ⚡ Speed, depth, reliability Execute confidently when timing matters. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🧭 A focused workflow for traders Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process. 👉 Get started → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ✅ Data‑driven decisions Focus on process—not noise. 👉 Sign up → NASA is reviewing accelerated lunar mission proposals from SpaceX and Blue Origin to counter China’s lunar progress, aiming for a landing before 2028 within President Trump’s term. A committee of experts will evaluate the fastest, safest path forward in the new space race. NASA forms expert committee to assess SpaceX and Blue Origin plans for quicker moon landings. Agency expresses doubts about SpaceX timelines amid test delays, considering alternatives like Blue Origin. SpaceX details simplified architecture with orbital refueling and 100-ton payload to enable permanent lunar presence, per October 30 update. NASA reviews SpaceX, Blue Origin lunar plans to beat China before 2028. Discover accelerated missions, expert insights, and U.S. space race strategies. Stay ahead—explore now! What is NASA’s approach to accelerating lunar missions with SpaceX and Blue Origin? NASA’s approach to accelerating lunar missions involves confirming and reviewing expedited proposals from SpaceX and Blue Origin to outpace China’s ambitions. The agency has established a committee of subject matter experts to identify the optimal strategy for the second lunar race, potentially fitting landings within President Donald Trump’s term before… The post NASA Reviews SpaceX and Blue Origin Plans for Accelerated Lunar Missions Against China appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 💹 Trade with pro tools Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🚀 Smooth orders, clear control Advanced order types and market depth in one view. 👉 Create account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 📈 Clarity in volatile markets Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline. 👉 Sign up → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ⚡ Speed, depth, reliability Execute confidently when timing matters. 👉 Open account → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup 🧭 A focused workflow for traders Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process. 👉 Get started → COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup ✅ Data‑driven decisions Focus on process—not noise. 👉 Sign up → NASA is reviewing accelerated lunar mission proposals from SpaceX and Blue Origin to counter China’s lunar progress, aiming for a landing before 2028 within President Trump’s term. A committee of experts will evaluate the fastest, safest path forward in the new space race. NASA forms expert committee to assess SpaceX and Blue Origin plans for quicker moon landings. Agency expresses doubts about SpaceX timelines amid test delays, considering alternatives like Blue Origin. SpaceX details simplified architecture with orbital refueling and 100-ton payload to enable permanent lunar presence, per October 30 update. NASA reviews SpaceX, Blue Origin lunar plans to beat China before 2028. Discover accelerated missions, expert insights, and U.S. space race strategies. Stay ahead—explore now! What is NASA’s approach to accelerating lunar missions with SpaceX and Blue Origin? NASA’s approach to accelerating lunar missions involves confirming and reviewing expedited proposals from SpaceX and Blue Origin to outpace China’s ambitions. The agency has established a committee of subject matter experts to identify the optimal strategy for the second lunar race, potentially fitting landings within President Donald Trump’s term before…

NASA Reviews SpaceX and Blue Origin Plans for Accelerated Lunar Missions Against China

COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
💹 Trade with pro tools
Fast execution, robust charts, clean risk controls.
👉 Open account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🚀 Smooth orders, clear control
Advanced order types and market depth in one view.
👉 Create account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📈 Clarity in volatile markets
Plan entries & exits, manage positions with discipline.
👉 Sign up →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
⚡ Speed, depth, reliability
Execute confidently when timing matters.
👉 Open account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧭 A focused workflow for traders
Alerts, watchlists, and a repeatable process.
👉 Get started →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
✅ Data‑driven decisions
Focus on process—not noise.
👉 Sign up →
  • NASA forms expert committee to assess SpaceX and Blue Origin plans for quicker moon landings.

  • Agency expresses doubts about SpaceX timelines amid test delays, considering alternatives like Blue Origin.

  • SpaceX details simplified architecture with orbital refueling and 100-ton payload to enable permanent lunar presence, per October 30 update.

NASA reviews SpaceX, Blue Origin lunar plans to beat China before 2028. Discover accelerated missions, expert insights, and U.S. space race strategies. Stay ahead—explore now!

What is NASA’s approach to accelerating lunar missions with SpaceX and Blue Origin?

NASA’s approach to accelerating lunar missions involves confirming and reviewing expedited proposals from SpaceX and Blue Origin to outpace China’s ambitions. The agency has established a committee of subject matter experts to identify the optimal strategy for the second lunar race, potentially fitting landings within President Donald Trump’s term before 2028. This urgency stems from recent concerns over delays in SpaceX’s Starship tests, prompting NASA to explore competitive options.

COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
💎 Join a professional trading community
Work with senior traders, research‑backed setups, and risk‑first frameworks.
👉 Join the group →
COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
📊 Transparent performance, real process
Spot strategies with documented months of triple‑digit runs during strong trends; futures plans use defined R:R and sizing.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
🧭 Research → Plan → Execute
Daily levels, watchlists, and post‑trade reviews to build consistency.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
🛡️ Risk comes first
Sizing methods, invalidation rules, and R‑multiples baked into every plan.
👉 Start today →
COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
🧠 Learn the “why” behind each trade
Live breakdowns, playbooks, and framework‑first education.
👉 Join the group →
COINOTAG recommends • Professional traders group
🚀 Insider • APEX • INNER CIRCLE
Choose the depth you need—tools, coaching, and member rooms.
👉 Explore tiers →

How is NASA addressing delays in SpaceX’s Starship program?

NASA’s acting chief Sean Duffy recently criticized SpaceX for repeated delays and explosions in Starship moon lander tests, threatening to reallocate the $4 billion contract to Blue Origin or other U.S. firms. Duffy emphasized the need to win against China, stating that NASA will not wait for one company. According to reports from Cryptopolitan, NASA doubts SpaceX’s ability to meet timelines, especially with Artemis II set for next year as a crewed lunar orbit trial. SpaceX, in response, published a detailed blog on October 30 outlining a simplified mission architecture focused on direct orbital refueling, over 1,000 cubic meters of habitable space, and a 100-ton payload capacity. This design aims to land humans on the moon safely and efficiently after more than 50 years, establishing a permanent presence beyond mere visits.

Elon Musk countered Duffy’s remarks by questioning the administrator’s expertise and highlighting Blue Origin’s lack of orbital achievements. Meanwhile, SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell expressed enthusiasm, stating she “cannot wait to go to the moon.” The company has self-funded up to 90% of the Human Landing System (HLS) development under a fixed-price NASA contract, paying only for achieved milestones. SpaceX’s progress includes producing nearly 600 Raptor engines with extensive test runtime, over three dozen Starships, and 22 combined flight tests of Starship and Super Heavy. Investments in facilities across Texas, Florida, and California are expanding manufacturing to over five million square feet, multiple test stands, and five launch pads to surpass Falcon program cadences.

COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📈 Clear interface, precise orders
Sharp entries & exits with actionable alerts.
👉 Create free account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🧠 Smarter tools. Better decisions.
Depth analytics and risk features in one view.
👉 Sign up →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🎯 Take control of entries & exits
Set alerts, define stops, execute consistently.
👉 Open account →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
🛠️ From idea to execution
Turn setups into plans with practical order types.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📋 Trade your plan
Watchlists and routing that support focus.
👉 Get started →
COINOTAG recommends • Exchange signup
📊 Precision without the noise
Data‑first workflows for active traders.
👉 Sign up →

Experts from the aerospace sector, as noted in industry analyses, underscore NASA’s multi-vendor strategy as a prudent measure to mitigate risks. A quote from Duffy captures the stakes: “They push their timelines out, and we’re in a race against China…The president and I want to get to the moon in this president’s term, so I’m going to open up the contracts.” This competitive dynamic ensures innovation, with SpaceX aiming not just for lunar footprints but a stepping stone to Mars.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key challenges in NASA’s lunar mission timeline with SpaceX?

NASA faces challenges from SpaceX’s Starship test delays and explosions, pushing back the Artemis program’s goals. The agency requires reliable human landing capabilities by 2028 to align with national priorities. Duffy’s threats to shift contracts highlight urgency, while SpaceX’s self-funded innovations in engines and facilities aim to resolve these issues through rigorous testing.

COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
⚡ Futures with discipline
Defined R:R, pre‑set invalidation, execution checklists.
👉 Join the club →
COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
🎯 Spot strategies that compound
Momentum & accumulation frameworks managed with clear risk.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
🏛️ APEX tier for serious traders
Deep dives, analyst Q&A, and accountability sprints.
👉 Explore APEX →
COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
📈 Real‑time market structure
Key levels, liquidity zones, and actionable context.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
🔔 Smart alerts, not noise
Context‑rich notifications tied to plans and risk—never hype.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Traders club
🤝 Peer review & coaching
Hands‑on feedback that sharpens execution and risk control.
👉 Join the club →

Why is NASA considering Blue Origin for lunar missions?

NASA is turning to Blue Origin due to SpaceX’s perceived delays in the race against China. As Duffy noted, the U.S. must accelerate to land during Trump’s term. Blue Origin’s potential to deliver on contracts offers a backup, ensuring no single company’s setbacks hinder progress toward sustainable lunar presence and beyond.

Key Takeaways

  • Accelerated Timeline: NASA targets moon landings before 2028, reviewing SpaceX and Blue Origin proposals to beat China.
  • SpaceX Innovations: Simplified architecture includes orbital refueling and vast habitable space, backed by billions in self-funding and extensive testing.
  • Competitive Strategy: Agency’s openness to alternatives like Blue Origin drives urgency; monitor developments for Mars pathway insights.

Conclusion

In summary, NASA’s lunar mission acceleration through SpaceX and Blue Origin proposals marks a pivotal push in the U.S.-China space rivalry, with expert committees evaluating safer, faster returns to the moon. Integrating Starship program advancements and competitive contracting ensures resilience against delays. As facilities expand and tests progress, this effort promises a permanent lunar foothold, advancing humanity’s multi-planetary future—watch for milestone updates to stay informed on this historic race.

COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
📌 Curated setups, clearly explained
Entry, invalidation, targets, and R:R defined before execution.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🧠 Data‑led decision making
Technical + flow + context synthesized into actionable plans.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🧱 Consistency over hype
Repeatable rules, realistic expectations, and a calmer mindset.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🕒 Patience is an edge
Wait for confirmation and manage risk with checklists.
👉 Join now →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
💼 Professional mentorship
Guidance from seasoned traders and structured feedback loops.
👉 Get access →
COINOTAG recommends • Members‑only research
🧮 Track • Review • Improve
Documented PnL tracking and post‑mortems to accelerate learning.
👉 Join now →

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/nasa-reviews-spacex-and-blue-origin-plans-for-accelerated-lunar-missions-against-china/

Market Opportunity
Bluefin Logo
Bluefin Price(BLUE)
$0.02011
$0.02011$0.02011
+0.34%
USD
Bluefin (BLUE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00