The post SBF Claims FTX Was Never Insolvent, Says Creditors Paid 120% appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a surprising twist, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) resurfaced on X this week with a detailed report claiming that FTX was never insolvent. The post, shared via his account @SBF_FTX, argues that the exchange always had enough assets to repay all customers in full, and accuses bankruptcy lawyers of “destroying value” through mismanagement. The report marks the most comprehensive rebuttal yet from the former FTX founder since his conviction. And it reignites a difficult question: was the collapse of FTX a true insolvency, or a liquidity crisis that spiraled out of control? [SBF says:] This is where the money went. https://t.co/HVRwEw5Z1k https://t.co/5DrA13L5YE pic.twitter.com/O6q77DvmTn — SBF (@SBF_FTX) October 31, 2025 SBF Says FTX Had Enough to Cover All Claims According to the report, FTX’s collapse was not caused by missing funds. Instead, SBF argues that the exchange held more than enough assets to cover the $8 billion in customer liabilities at the time of bankruptcy. He claims that 98% of creditors have already been repaid 120%, with total recoveries expected between 119% and 143% of their original claims. “FTX was never insolvent,” the report states. “The money never left. The $8 billion owed was always there, mismanaged, maybe, but not missing.” The filing also claims that even after covering all customer repayments and $1 billion in legal fees, the FTX bankruptcy estate still holds $8 billion. SBF: FTX was never insolvent. The $8 billion in customer assets owed when FTX filed for bankruptcy protection never left the platform, and all customers will receive 119% to 143% repayment, with about 98% of creditors already paid 120%. After covering $8 billion in claims and $1… — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) October 31, 2025 $136 Billion in Assets, “Destroyed by Mismanagement” The 38-page document lays out a staggering asset list that SBF says was misused or… The post SBF Claims FTX Was Never Insolvent, Says Creditors Paid 120% appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a surprising twist, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) resurfaced on X this week with a detailed report claiming that FTX was never insolvent. The post, shared via his account @SBF_FTX, argues that the exchange always had enough assets to repay all customers in full, and accuses bankruptcy lawyers of “destroying value” through mismanagement. The report marks the most comprehensive rebuttal yet from the former FTX founder since his conviction. And it reignites a difficult question: was the collapse of FTX a true insolvency, or a liquidity crisis that spiraled out of control? [SBF says:] This is where the money went. https://t.co/HVRwEw5Z1k https://t.co/5DrA13L5YE pic.twitter.com/O6q77DvmTn — SBF (@SBF_FTX) October 31, 2025 SBF Says FTX Had Enough to Cover All Claims According to the report, FTX’s collapse was not caused by missing funds. Instead, SBF argues that the exchange held more than enough assets to cover the $8 billion in customer liabilities at the time of bankruptcy. He claims that 98% of creditors have already been repaid 120%, with total recoveries expected between 119% and 143% of their original claims. “FTX was never insolvent,” the report states. “The money never left. The $8 billion owed was always there, mismanaged, maybe, but not missing.” The filing also claims that even after covering all customer repayments and $1 billion in legal fees, the FTX bankruptcy estate still holds $8 billion. SBF: FTX was never insolvent. The $8 billion in customer assets owed when FTX filed for bankruptcy protection never left the platform, and all customers will receive 119% to 143% repayment, with about 98% of creditors already paid 120%. After covering $8 billion in claims and $1… — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) October 31, 2025 $136 Billion in Assets, “Destroyed by Mismanagement” The 38-page document lays out a staggering asset list that SBF says was misused or…

SBF Claims FTX Was Never Insolvent, Says Creditors Paid 120%

In a surprising twist, Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) resurfaced on X this week with a detailed report claiming that FTX was never insolvent.

The post, shared via his account @SBF_FTX, argues that the exchange always had enough assets to repay all customers in full, and accuses bankruptcy lawyers of “destroying value” through mismanagement.

The report marks the most comprehensive rebuttal yet from the former FTX founder since his conviction. And it reignites a difficult question: was the collapse of FTX a true insolvency, or a liquidity crisis that spiraled out of control?

SBF Says FTX Had Enough to Cover All Claims

According to the report, FTX’s collapse was not caused by missing funds. Instead, SBF argues that the exchange held more than enough assets to cover the $8 billion in customer liabilities at the time of bankruptcy.

He claims that 98% of creditors have already been repaid 120%, with total recoveries expected between 119% and 143% of their original claims.

The filing also claims that even after covering all customer repayments and $1 billion in legal fees, the FTX bankruptcy estate still holds $8 billion.

$136 Billion in Assets, “Destroyed by Mismanagement”

The 38-page document lays out a staggering asset list that SBF says was misused or sold off at fire-sale prices by bankruptcy administrators.

According to his report, FTX’s petition-date holdings are now worth about $136 billion, including:

$14.3B in Anthropic equity

$7.6B in Robinhood stock

$1.2B in Genesis Digital Assets

$600M in SpaceX (via K5 Global)

58M SOL worth around $12.4B

890M SUI valued at $2.9B

205,000 BTC ($2.3B)

225.4M XRP ($600M)

112,600 ETH ($500M)

$1.7B in cash

$345.2M in stablecoins

The report alleges that John Ray III and the legal firm Sullivan & Cromwell, who have managed the bankruptcy process, “seized FTX for profit” and “destroyed over $136 billion in value” by liquidating key holdings at deep discounts.

SBF accuses them of turning a “short-term liquidity crunch into a years-long legal drain.”

98% of Creditors Already Paid

In the report, SBF emphasizes that creditors have not only been made whole, they’ve been repaid more than they were owed.

According to him, 98% of creditors have received 120% repayments, with the remaining 2% still undergoing reconciliation. After accounting for all claims and legal fees, the estate allegedly retains $8 billion in surplus assets.

If accurate, it would mean that the billions once thought “lost” were never actually missing, only frozen during restructuring.

ZachXBT Calls Out “Misleading” Recovery Claims

Not everyone agrees with SBF’s new narrative.

On-chain investigator ZachXBT challenged the claim, arguing that FTX creditors were repaid based on November 2022 prices, not current market values.

That means users who held volatile assets like SOL or BTC at the time of bankruptcy received dollar-denominated compensation at the asset’s bottom, missing out on massive gains since then.

For example, Solana (SOL) has risen dramatically since the FTX collapse, trading around $196, according to CoinMarketCap, compared to under $15 when the exchange went under. That means users who held SOL lost the upside, even if they technically got “120% repayment.”

FTX’s Asset Fire Sales and Alleged Missteps

The report goes further to allege that FTX’s restructuring team “liquidated core assets prematurely”, particularly Solana, Anthropic, and Robinhood shares.

SBF accuses the lawyers of “self-enrichment,” claiming that “value destruction” came not from missing funds but from “fire-sale transactions and prolonged litigation.”

He points to Anthropic, the AI startup whose valuation soared from a few billion in 2022 to tens of billions in 2025. The report suggests that had those shares been held, creditors could have received even higher recoveries.

A Possible Bid for Redemption?

The timing of the report has raised speculation that SBF may be seeking a public rehabilitation or potential legal appeal.

The document’s tone, part financial breakdown, part defense statement, appears aimed at reframing his legacy from “fraudulent collapse” to “mismanaged solvency.”

With 98% of creditors reportedly repaid and the exchange’s asset base valued higher than ever, SBF’s supporters argue he may have grounds to request leniency or even a presidential pardon.

However, legal experts remain skeptical. FTX’s bankruptcy process has already spent nearly $1 billion in legal fees, and regulators previously described the firm’s internal accounting as “unreliable and misleading.”

A Divided Reaction Across Crypto Twitter

Crypto Twitter has been split in response to SBF’s comeback.

Some users see the report as an attempt to rewrite history, while others argue that the data, if verified, could reshape how the FTX saga is remembered.

@CryptoRand shared the view that the claims were “a desperate PR move,” while others praised the transparency in the breakdown of remaining assets.

The debate highlights an ongoing divide within the crypto community: was FTX a case of fraud, mismanagement, or both?

What Comes Next for FTX and Its Creditors

With repayments ongoing and major asset sales completed, FTX’s bankruptcy may soon reach its closing phase. But SBF’s new report ensures the debate over what really happened will continue for years.

If accurate, the claim that $8 billion remains after full creditor repayment would mark one of the most unusual turnarounds in bankruptcy history.

Still, critics maintain that solvency after-the-fact doesn’t erase wrongdoing. Even if FTX had the funds, decisions that led to its collapse, including commingling of assets and lack of transparency, remain central to SBF’s conviction.

Sam Bankman-Fried’s latest report reopens a complex chapter in the FTX saga. It paints a picture of a platform that was never truly insolvent, only frozen by legal overreach and internal panic.

Yet, on-chain analysts and former customers remain unconvinced.

If 98% of creditors were paid 120%, that’s a remarkable recovery. But whether that absolves the man at the center of it all, or rewrites crypto’s biggest downfall, remains to be seen.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Source: https://nulltx.com/sbf-claims-ftx-was-never-insolvent-says-creditors-paid-120/

Market Opportunity
PAID Network Logo
PAID Network Price(PAID)
$0.001867
$0.001867$0.001867
+0.32%
USD
PAID Network (PAID) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00