X’s 2026 terms classify prompts and outputs as “Content,” grant broad AI-training rights, add anti-jailbreak rules and keep $15k scraping penalties with Texas courtsX’s 2026 terms classify prompts and outputs as “Content,” grant broad AI-training rights, add anti-jailbreak rules and keep $15k scraping penalties with Texas courts

X expands ‘Content’ to AI prompts, outputs in 2026 terms update

X’s 2026 terms classify prompts and outputs as “Content,” grant broad AI-training rights, add anti-jailbreak rules and keep $15k scraping penalties with Texas courts.​

Summary
  • 2026 terms redefine Content to include prompts, outputs and data “obtained or created” through X, licensed worldwide for any use, including AI training, without extra pay.​
  • New misuse clause targets AI “jailbreaking,” prompt injection and circumvention, while liquidated damages stay at $15,000 per 1,000,000 posts scraped in 24 hours.​
  • X keeps Tarrant County, Texas, as the forum, imposes 1–2 year claim windows, class-action waivers and a $100 liability cap, moves critics say chill research and lawsuits.

Social media platform X announced terms of service changes effective Jan. 15, 2026, that expand the company’s definition of user “Content” and add provisions related to artificial intelligence system operations, according to the updated agreement published by the company.

X and the crypto content

The revisions broaden the definition of user Content to explicitly include “inputs, prompts, outputs,” and information “obtained or created through the Services,” according to the draft terms. The current terms, dated Nov. 15, 2024, remain in effect until the 2026 version takes over.

Under the updated agreement, users grant X a worldwide, royalty-free, sublicensable license to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display, and distribute Content “for any purpose,” including analyzing it and training machine learning and AI models, according to the terms document. The agreement states that no compensation is paid for those uses and that access to the service constitutes “sufficient compensation.”

The 2024 terms framed user responsibility around “any Content you provide,” without expressly naming prompts and outputs, according to a comparison of the documents.

The 2026 draft adds a prohibited-conduct clause targeting AI circumvention attempts. The terms define “misuse” to include attempts to bypass platform controls through “jailbreaking,” “prompt engineering, or injection,” language that does not appear in the 2024 terms, according to the documents.

The updated agreement includes Europe-specific provisions addressing content enforcement under European Union and United Kingdom law. The terms note that EU and UK law can require enforcement against content described as “harmful” or “unsafe,” with examples including bullying or humiliating content, eating disorder content, and content about methods of self-harm or suicide. The 2026 terms add UK-specific language describing how users can challenge enforcement actions under the UK Online Safety Act 2023.

X maintains restrictions on automated access and data collection, barring crawling or scraping “in any form, for any purpose” without prior written consent. The terms set liquidated damages at $15,000 per 1,000,000 posts requested, viewed, or accessed in any 24-hour period when violations involve that volume, according to the agreement. The 2026 draft adjusts wording to apply when a user induces or knowingly facilitates violations.

Dispute provisions require claims to proceed in federal or state courts in Tarrant County, Texas. The 2026 text states that forum and choice-of-law provisions apply to “pending and future disputes” regardless of when the underlying conduct occurred. The updated terms establish a one-year deadline for federal claims and two years for state claims, replacing the single one-year deadline in the earlier version.

The agreement includes a class-action waiver barring users from bringing claims as a class or in representative proceedings in many cases, and caps X’s liability at $100 per covered dispute, according to the terms.

The Knight First Amendment Institute stated that X’s terms “will stifle independent research” and called the approach “a disturbing move that the company should reverse.” The Center for Countering Digital Hate announced in November 2024 that it would quit X ahead of a terms change and criticized the Texas venue requirement as a tactic to steer disputes toward favorable courts. The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism described how lawsuits can have “a chilling effect” on critics, according to published statements.

The changes take effect Jan. 15, 2026, according to X’s announcement.

Market Opportunity
Sleepless AI Logo
Sleepless AI Price(AI)
$0.03601
$0.03601$0.03601
-2.06%
USD
Sleepless AI (AI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game

Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game

The post Singapore Entrepreneur Loses Entire Crypto Portfolio After Downloading Fake Game appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief A Singapore-based man has
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 05:17
‘Rich Dad Poor Dad’ Author Kiyosaki Breaks Silence on Fed Rate Cut With Bitcoin Call

‘Rich Dad Poor Dad’ Author Kiyosaki Breaks Silence on Fed Rate Cut With Bitcoin Call

The post ‘Rich Dad Poor Dad’ Author Kiyosaki Breaks Silence on Fed Rate Cut With Bitcoin Call appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Robert Kiyosaki is back doing
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/18 05:25