TLDR The SEC finalized civil judgments against Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, and Nishad Singh over the FTX collapse. Ellison faces a 10-year ban, while Wang and TLDR The SEC finalized civil judgments against Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, and Nishad Singh over the FTX collapse. Ellison faces a 10-year ban, while Wang and

SEC Finalizes Civil Judgments Against Former FTX Executives Over Collapse

TLDR

  • The SEC finalized civil judgments against Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, and Nishad Singh over the FTX collapse.
  • Ellison faces a 10-year ban, while Wang and Singh face 8-year bans from public company roles.
  • The SEC claims FTX secretly provided Alameda with special privileges, diverting customer funds.
  • All three executives agreed to permanent injunctions barring violations of U.S. securities laws.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized civil consent judgments against three former executives of FTX and its sister firm, Alameda Research. Caroline Ellison, Gary Wang, and Nishad Singh were involved in the crypto exchange’s collapse, with the SEC accusing them of misleading investors and diverting customer funds for personal gain. The civil judgments, which are awaiting court approval, conclude a significant chapter in the SEC’s enforcement case tied to the failure of FTX.

FTX’s Alleged Misrepresentation of Operations

According to the SEC, FTX misled investors by falsely portraying itself as a secure and reliable trading platform. The platform raised more than $1.8 billion, claiming to offer strong protections for customer assets. Additionally, FTX assured investors that Alameda Research operated like any other customer on the exchange. However, the SEC revealed that these claims were false. In reality, FTX secretly granted Alameda special privileges, allowing the firm to circumvent risk controls and providing an unlimited line of credit backed by customer deposits.

The SEC alleges that Caroline Ellison, the former CEO of Alameda, used these funds for high-risk trading, investments, and loans to executives. Wang and Singh, who were key figures at FTX, are accused of creating the software systems that enabled the diversion of customer funds to Alameda.

Settlements and Bans for Executives

Without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, all three former executives agreed to settle the charges by accepting permanent injunctions. These injunctions prohibit them from engaging in activities that would violate U.S. securities laws. As part of the settlements, Ellison has consented to a 10-year ban from serving as an officer or director of any public company. Meanwhile, Wang and Singh have agreed to 8-year bans from holding similar roles.

In addition to these bans, all three individuals have agreed to 5-year conduct-based injunctions. These injunctions allow the SEC to take swift action if any of the former executives reenter securities-related activities inappropriately.

Criminal Sentences and Current Status of Executives

As of December 2025, the criminal status of the three executives has been resolved. Caroline Ellison is under home confinement, with her release expected in early 2026. Both Gary Wang and Nishad Singh received time-served sentences, having cooperated extensively with federal prosecutors. Wang is currently under supervised release, as is Singh.

The SEC’s enforcement case against these executives marks a significant step in the regulatory response to the FTX collapse. The civil judgments are expected to further strengthen the SEC’s efforts to hold individuals accountable for misconduct in the cryptocurrency space.

The post SEC Finalizes Civil Judgments Against Former FTX Executives Over Collapse appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Comedian Logo
Comedian Price(BAN)
$0.08813
$0.08813$0.08813
+17.77%
USD
Comedian (BAN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case

Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case

The post Zimbabwean Doctor Pushes for Appeal in $550,000 Crypto Theft Case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A prominent Zimbabwean eye specialist is demanding
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 20:59
Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold

Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold

The post Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation Threshold appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Load The Bags! Bitcoin MVRV Hits Key Accumulation
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 21:10