England extends its unbeaten run against African teams as it arranges a mouth-watering FIFA World Cup quarterfinals clash with defending champions FranceEngland extends its unbeaten run against African teams as it arranges a mouth-watering FIFA World Cup quarterfinals clash with defending champions France

Rappler’s most impactful 2025 stories and initiatives: Vote your favorite!

2025/12/22 17:00

The year 2025 overwhelmed us with controversies, cliffhangers (fate of the Independent Commission for Infrastructure, anyone?), and plot twists worthy of a Netflix series. In the Rappler newsroom, it also presented an exciting challenge: how to untangle the mess, make sense of the conflicting narratives, and tune out the noise so we can focus on the facts and the action needed?

This year, our team made many shifts to zero in on the issues our community most cares about.

We were laser-focused on pushing for good governance and accountability, as well as fighting corruption and manipulation. We did our best to stay true to our North Star: to go for impact, rather than just page views and clicks.

This year’s list of Rappler’s Most Impactful Stories and Initiatives in 2025 embodies this collective effort.

They are the blood, sweat, tears, and joy of our Core managers, editors, reporters, community engagement staff, artists, video producers and editors, researchers, fact-checkers, production specialists, fellows, volunteers, and support staff.

The nine stories and four initiatives that made it to the list were chosen by our cluster and unit heads based on four indicators of impact:

  • Did the initiative lead to a shift in policy? (Probe launched, decision reversed or amended, action stopped, etc.)
  • Did the initiative nudge a powerful individual or group to respond in a meaningful way? (We don’t count “no comment.” The story should have been important enough for a powerful entity that is usually silent to respond with a statement, press conference, etc.)
  • Did the initiative catalyze a broad and engaging discussion about an issue that has never been reported on or brought out in the open? (indicators of this can be significant online and offline engagement on the issue, meaningful feedback from people affected by the issue who can attest to the impact of the story)
  • Did the initiative lead to any observable change in an issue or sector? (indicators can be documentation of the change through photos, videos, recordings, and testimonials of individuals or groups)
Vote for your favorite impactful story and initiative, win a prize

We want to hear from you. What do you think is our most impactful work this year from the list below? 

You can vote one each under these two categories: Most Impactful Story, and Most Impactful Civic Engagement Initiative.

Tap the button below to go straight to the voting form, or read through detailed explanations of each story and initiative by scrolling down further.

&
Cast your vote now!

You must be registered on your Rappler account to vote. You can register or log in here, for free. Voting closes on January 2, 2026

After voting, you will receive a confirmation email asking if you would like to explain your choices. This feedback helps us understand how you define impact, and how we can do even more meaningful work next year. We ask you to send your vote explanation to the Volunteer Opportunities chat room on the Rappler app.

The voters who contribute the best explanation will win a limited edition Rappler x Linya-Linya #MabutiPa t-shirt. 

Do you want to help us continue with our impactful work in 2026? You can do so by contributing to our crowdfunding campaign, or by becoming a Rappler+ member.

Here are the most impactful stories and initiatives by Rappler in 2025

Category 1: Most Impactful Story

1. A Rappler investigative report on justice undersecretary Jojo Cadiz leads to an Ombudsman probe and his resignation.

Reporter Lian Buan’s exclusive on Jojo Cadiz, a trusted aide of President Marcos, disclosed that his university student son owns a firm that managed to win contracts in Ilocos Norte, the President’s home province and bailiwick. A day after the story’s publication, Malacañang said Cadiz has resigned. Ombudsman Boying Remulla also announced a probe, citing the article as among its bases. 

2. This report bolstered municipal fishers’ petitions to keep their fishing grounds away from commercial fishing operators.

Rappler first exposed in December 2024 that the Supreme Court had affirmed the decision of a regional trial court allowing a commercial fisher to fish within municipal waters, an area usually designated for small fisherfolk. In 2025, various groups referred to this story by reporter Iya Gozum in their petitions to intervene in the case.

3. Rappler was first to report on Zaldy Co’s businesses, laying the foundation for a national conversation on public works corruption.

Even before Zaldy Co became embroiled in controversies over public works projects, Rappler had already investigated the business interests of the resigned congressman and former chair of the House appropriations committee. Rappler reporter Dwight de Leon and former business reporter Kaycee Valmonte wrote about Co’s construction empire four months before President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced his flood control contracts probe during his State of the Nation Address last July. The second story in this two-part exclusive found that, though Co had sold his stake in the scandal-plagued infrastructure firm Sunwest, his family, and friends continued to be active shareholders of other businesses closely tied to the company.

4. Rappler’s Politicontractors map brings secrets about conflict of interest, corruption into the national spotlight.

Our Politicontractors map visualizes the proliferation of public officials with ties to firms that have bagged public works contracts. The map collated journalistic work, bolstered by citizen tips, bringing the open secrets tainting communities into the national spotlight. The term used by Rappler, “politicontractors,” is now used by civil society groups and budget watchdogs. The map is the work of Lian Buan, Dwight de Leon, Jairo Bolledo, Jodesz Gavilan, and James Patrick Cruz.

5. A series of Rappler reports uncovers the controversies behind the Villar business empire, leading to government sanctions.

The year 2025 is when the myth behind the Philippines’ former richest man, Manuel “Manny” Villar, was shattered. Villar had built a reputation for being Mr. Sipag at Tiyaga — wealth earned through diligence and perseverance. But the controversies involving a number of his business companies in 2025, including water concessionaire PrimeWater and Siquijor island’s then-power supplier, SIPCOR, show how badly the Villars have mixed business with public service. Rappler business columnist Val Villanueva’s series of Vantage Point articles, starting in March 2025, on the former Senate president’s property holding firm, Villar Land (formerly Golden MV Holdings), provides the most comprehensive output by a Philippine news publisher on what is undoubtedly the biggest financial scandal of the year. Months later, the Securities and Exchange Commission would sanction the parties involved. Rappler also has this exclusive by former reporter Kaycee Valmonte on the difficulties faced by a number of suppliers of the Villar family’s coffee venture, Coffee Project.

6. A Rappler report on Senator Francis Escudero’s ties to contractor Lawrence Lubiano triggers a Comelec probe.

A few hours after President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. released the list of the country’s top flood control project contractors, Rappler reporter James Patrick Cruz wrote about how then-Senate President Francis Escudero’s top election donor won flood control contracts in the senator’s own province. The story prompted the senator to call a press conference to address the article, and led to a probe by the Commission on Elections (Comelec). Escudero was also later ousted as Senate president. A department in the Comelec eventually cleared him of liability, claiming there was not enough evidence to show that Lubiano was used indirectly by his firm Centerways Construction to donate to Escudero’s election campaign.

Reporter Jairo Bolledo showed how a firm owned by Senator Go’s father, and which bears his initials, had partnered with firms owned by the embattled Discayas on infrastructure projects in the Davao region worth P800 million. At the time, Go was special assistant to then-president Rodrigo Duterte. Fast forward to when this story was published: Go was vice chairperson of the Senate blue ribbon committee probing flood control projects. The story was cited by former senator Antonio Trillanes IV when he filed a plunder complaint against Duterte and Go.

8. The government gives assurances it is addressing cases of Filipino seafarers abandoned at sea, after a Rappler report.

This story by reporter Lian Buan prompted the Department of Migrant Workers to give assurances to the public that it is cracking down on manning agencies and ship owners involved in the abandonment of Filipino seafarers. The story shed light on an underreported labor issue, and widened discussions about it.

9. Rappler amplified Bangsamoro watchdogs’ concerns about the region’s electoral code, helping gain the attention of lawmakers.

Weeks before the planned BARMM elections, Rappler Mindanao bureau chief Herbie Gomez wrote that a clause in the Bangsamoro Electoral Code could trigger a failure of elections. The October elections were later moved from October 2025 to 2026 after the Supreme Court struck down BARMM’s parliamentary districting laws. BARMM lawmakers have since filed bills to remove or amend the clause – the “None of the Above” (NOTA) provision.

Category 2: Most Impactful Civic Engagement Initiative

1. Rappler’s FloodControlPH crowdsourcing sparks citizen monitoring and collaboration with journalists to report on anomalous public works projects.

Our FloodControlPH crowdsourcing initiative has so far gathered at least 80 reports from citizens about suspicious or anomalous flood control and public works projects in different parts of the country. It also triggered tips being sent in through other platforms, such as Instagram, Facebook, emails, and Google Forms. The information is shared regularly to Rappler’s reporting and community engagement staff, with some verified tips leading to articles and video reports.

2. Rappler kapihan sessions and town halls gave citizens a space to directly ask their local government leaders questions about community concerns.

Rappler’s #AmbagNatin kapihan and town halls brought citizens and local government officials in one room to discuss governance and liveability issues — ranging from water distribution, to traffic, to flooding. The six fora — held in Manila, Marikina, Cavite, Bulacan, Dagupan City, and Zamboanga City — were attended by 24 local government officials and candidates, including 7 mayors or mayoral candidates. They were attended by over 460 people. Articles about the fora written by Movers trained by Rappler to cover governance issues reached even more people. Interactions there helped strengthen our reporting on PrimeWater issues, flooding, and more. These fora were organized by our civic engagement arm, MovePH, and various partners.

If you want to stay updated on all of Rappler’s previous and upcoming events and roadshows, check this page.

3. The Aries Rufo Journalism Fellowship helped talented campus journalists produce stories that prompted government action and sparked community discussions.

The 2025 fellowship trained eight campus journalists to produce over 75 stories that inspired public discourse on long-ignored local issues, sparked broad online engagement, and prompted meaningful responses from local officials. Before the actual fellowship, shortlisted campus journalists were also able to produce over 35 reports that covered the local campaign and election scene in at least 12 cities and municipalities in the country in a little over two weeks. The program’s sharpened thematic focus on good governance and information integrity led to tangible impact, including policy attention, renewed scrutiny, and community-driven conversations across multiple regions. Stories produced as part of the program, through the mentorship of our editorial team, resulted in the following: 

  • Official action and renewed scrutiny on governance issues
  • Triggered wide community discussions across Facebook, Reddit, and local groups
  • Elevated underreported concerns, from flooding to waste management to election practices, leading residents to demand accountability
  • Documented community-level change supported by testimonials and public feedback

In 2025, Rappler’s civic engagement arm MovePH piloted an anti-scam campaign through two events in Laguna and Manila. The events featured workshops on fact-checking, reporting scams and fraud, and digital security, and a public forum. Held in the University of the Philippines Los Baños and the Far Eastern University Manila, the roadshow was attended by almost 600 people, including over a hundred senior citizens, a demographic vulnerable to online scams. We collaborated, for the first time, with the Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center (CICC) and National Commission of Senior Citizens (NCSC). Because of this, the CICC and NCSC were able to work together on another event, a December outreach program. The initiative sparked collaboration among Rappler, the academe, civil society groups, youth groups, senior citizen groups, and government, towards the shared goal of protecting communities from manipulation.

Cast your vote!

&
Return to Top

Help us make even more impact in 2026! Consider donating to Rappler through our crowdfunding initiative. You can also support us by becoming a Rappler+ member. This premium membership program gets you an ad-free reading experience on our website, exclusive newsletters and content, early access to our investigative reports, and invitations to exclusive events – the best way to connect with us while helping us survive challenging times for media and journalism.

Thank you for your support! See you next year. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Clash Logo
Clash Price(CLASH)
$0,020115
$0,020115$0,020115
-0,70%
USD
Clash (CLASH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Coinbase Premium Turns Negative Amid Asian Buying Surge

U.S. Coinbase Premium Turns Negative Amid Asian Buying Surge

U.S. institutional demand falls as Asian markets buy Bitcoin dips, causing negative Coinbase premium.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/23 14:20
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar

USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar

The post USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. USD/JPY climbs to near 148.30 as Fed’s Powell didn’t endorse aggressive dovish stance. Fed’s Powell warns of slowing job demand and upside inflation risks. Japan’s Jibun Bank Manufacturing PMI declines at a faster pace in September. The USD/JPY pair trades 0.45% higher to near 148.30 during the European trading session on Wednesday. The pair gains sharply as the US Dollar (USD) outperforms a majority of its peers, following comments from Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Jerome Powell that the central bank needs to be cautious on further interest rate cuts. During the press time, the US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the Greenback’s value against six major currencies, rises almost 0.4% to near 97.60. The USD Index resumes its upside journey after a two-day corrective move. On Tuesday, Fed’s Powell stated at the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce that the upside inflation risks and labor market concerns have posed a challenging situation for the central bank, which is prompting officials to exercise caution on further monetary policy easing. Powell also stated that the current interest rate range is “well positioned to respond to potential economic developments”. Fed Powell’s comments were similar to statements from Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic, and Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack who stated on Monday that the central bank needs to cautious over unwinding monetary policy restrictiveness further, citing persistent inflation risks. Going forward, investors will focus on the US Durable Goods Orders and Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index (PCE) data for August, which will be released on Thursday and Friday, respectively. In Japan, the manufacturing business activity has declined again in September. Preliminary Jibun Bank Manufacturing PMI data came in lower at 48.4 against 49.7 in August. Economists had anticipated the Manufacturing PMI to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/25 01:31