The post Bitcoin firm Fold Holdings gains Russell 2000 approval amid exclusion tensions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. While the MSCI is proposing excludingThe post Bitcoin firm Fold Holdings gains Russell 2000 approval amid exclusion tensions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. While the MSCI is proposing excluding

Bitcoin firm Fold Holdings gains Russell 2000 approval amid exclusion tensions

While the MSCI is proposing excluding digital asset treasury companies with over 50% crypto holdings from its indexes, Fold Holdings has made sort of an uphill climb by announcing that it will be included in the Russell 2000 Index. 

Fold Holdings, a Bitcoin financial services firm, has announced that it will be included in the Russell 2000 Index despite the MSCI considering the exclusion  of digital asset treasuries from its indexes.

Has Fold Holdings been included in the Russell 2000 Index?

Fold Holdings announced its inclusion in the Russell 2000 Index on December 22. The Russell 2000 tracks small-cap U.S. stocks, representing approximately 5-7% of the U.S. public equity market capitalization, and serves as a benchmark for mutual funds, ETFs, and other asset managers.

Will Reeves, Fold’s Chairman and CEO, said the inclusion validates the company’s position as a successful public company. He expects the listing to broaden market awareness and increase visibility among institutional and retail investors.

Fold operates as a Bitcoin financial services firm focused on making it easy for individuals to earn, save, and spend Bitcoin through everyday financial tools, including its Bitcoin Gift Card and upcoming Fold Bitcoin Rewards Credit Card.

Will Bitcoin-holding firms be excluded from indexes?

MSCI, a major index provider, proposed in October to remove companies whose digital asset holdings represent 50% or more of their total assets from its global benchmarks. The firm argues these companies are more similar to investment funds rather than operational businesses, which MSCI does not include in its indexes.

Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy and led by Bitcoin advocate Michael Saylor, saw its shares surge 3,000% after it began purchasing Bitcoin in 2020.

Analysts estimate that exclusion from MSCI could trigger $2.8 billion in outflows. And that figure could rise to $8.8 billion if other indexes follow suit. JPMorgan’s analysis suggests Strategy has $2.5 billion of market value from MSCI membership and $5.5 billion from other indexes, making up a significant portion of the company’s $45 billion market value.

Michael Saylor initially dismissed concerns about MSCI exclusion, but later, through a public letter co-authored by Strategy’s CEO Phong Le, the pair warned that digital asset treasury exclusion would result in $2.8 billion of stock liquidation and “chill” the industry.

The executives argued the proposal would deprive these companies of about $15 trillion in passive investments.

Why is MSCI’s decision on digital asset treasuries important?

MSCI’s consultation period runs until January 15, 2025, when a final decision will be announced. According to Kaasha Saini, head of index strategy at Jefferies, the eligibility of digital asset treasury companies in equity indexes generally will be affected by this decision. She expects most equity indexes would move to follow MSCI’s lead if exclusion occurs.

Saini pointed out that passive asset managers hold an estimated 30% of a large-cap company’s free float, which creates a significant problem for digital asset treasury companies, as many of them fund their token purchases by selling stock.

As of September, at least 200 digital asset treasury companies had a combined market capitalization of around $150 billion, more than triple the figure from a year earlier, according to law firm DLA Piper.

MSCI’s preliminary list names 38 companies at risk of exclusion, with a combined issuer market cap of $46.7 billion as of September 30.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/fold-holdings-gains-russell-2000-approval/

Market Opportunity
GAINS Logo
GAINS Price(GAINS)
$0.01331
$0.01331$0.01331
-2.06%
USD
GAINS (GAINS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Coinbase Premium Turns Negative Amid Asian Buying Surge

U.S. Coinbase Premium Turns Negative Amid Asian Buying Surge

U.S. institutional demand falls as Asian markets buy Bitcoin dips, causing negative Coinbase premium.
Share
CoinLive2025/12/23 14:20
Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security

BitcoinWorld Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security Ever wondered why withdrawing your staked Ethereum (ETH) isn’t an instant process? It’s a question that often sparks debate within the crypto community. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin recently stepped forward to defend the network’s approximately 45-day ETH unstaking period, asserting its crucial role in safeguarding the network’s integrity. This lengthy waiting time, while sometimes seen as an inconvenience, is a deliberate design choice with profound implications for security. Why is the ETH Unstaking Period a Vital Security Measure? Vitalik Buterin’s defense comes amidst comparisons to other networks, like Solana, which boast significantly shorter unstaking times. He drew a compelling parallel to military operations, explaining that an army cannot function effectively if its soldiers can simply abandon their posts at a moment’s notice. Similarly, a blockchain network requires a stable and committed validator set to maintain its security. The current ETH unstaking period isn’t merely an arbitrary delay. It acts as a critical buffer, providing the network with sufficient time to detect and respond to potential malicious activities. If validators could instantly exit, it would open doors for sophisticated attacks, jeopardizing the entire system. Currently, Ethereum boasts over one million active validators, collectively staking approximately 35.6 million ETH, representing about 30% of the total supply. This massive commitment underpins the network’s robust security model, and the unstaking period helps preserve this stability. Network Security: Ethereum’s Paramount Concern A shorter ETH unstaking period might seem appealing for liquidity, but it introduces significant risks. Imagine a scenario where a large number of validators, potentially colluding, could quickly withdraw their stake after committing a malicious act. Without a substantial delay, the network would have limited time to penalize them or mitigate the damage. This “exit queue” mechanism is designed to prevent sudden validator exodus, which could lead to: Reduced decentralization: A rapid drop in active validators could concentrate power among fewer participants. Increased vulnerability to attacks: A smaller, less stable validator set is easier to compromise. Network instability: Frequent and unpredictable changes in validator numbers can lead to performance issues and consensus failures. Therefore, the extended period is not a bug; it’s a feature. It’s a calculated trade-off between immediate liquidity for stakers and the foundational security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem. Ethereum vs. Solana: Different Approaches to Unstaking When discussing the ETH unstaking period, many point to networks like Solana, which offers a much quicker two-day unstaking process. While this might seem like an advantage for stakers seeking rapid access to their funds, it reflects fundamental differences in network architecture and security philosophies. Solana’s design prioritizes speed and immediate liquidity, often relying on different consensus mechanisms and validator economics to manage security risks. Ethereum, on the other hand, with its proof-of-stake evolution from proof-of-work, has adopted a more cautious approach to ensure its transition and long-term stability are uncompromised. Each network makes design choices based on its unique goals and threat models. Ethereum’s substantial value and its role as a foundational layer for countless dApps necessitate an extremely robust security posture, making the current unstaking duration a deliberate and necessary component. What Does the ETH Unstaking Period Mean for Stakers? For individuals and institutions staking ETH, understanding the ETH unstaking period is crucial for managing expectations and investment strategies. It means that while staking offers attractive rewards, it also comes with a commitment to the network’s long-term health. Here are key considerations for stakers: Liquidity Planning: Stakers should view their staked ETH as a longer-term commitment, not immediately liquid capital. Risk Management: The delay inherently reduces the ability to react quickly to market volatility with staked assets. Network Contribution: By participating, stakers contribute directly to the security and decentralization of Ethereum, reinforcing its value proposition. While the current waiting period may not be “optimal” in every sense, as Buterin acknowledged, simply shortening it without addressing the underlying security implications would be a dangerous gamble for the network’s reliability. In conclusion, Vitalik Buterin’s defense of the lengthy ETH unstaking period underscores a fundamental principle: network security cannot be compromised for the sake of convenience. It is a vital mechanism that protects Ethereum’s integrity, ensuring its stability and trustworthiness as a leading blockchain platform. This deliberate design choice, while requiring patience from stakers, ultimately fortifies the entire ecosystem against potential threats, paving the way for a more secure and reliable decentralized future. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is the main reason for Ethereum’s long unstaking period? A1: The primary reason is network security. A lengthy ETH unstaking period prevents malicious actors from quickly withdrawing their stake after an attack, giving the network time to detect and penalize them, thus maintaining stability and integrity. Q2: How long is the current ETH unstaking period? A2: The current ETH unstaking period is approximately 45 days. This duration can fluctuate based on network conditions and the number of validators in the exit queue. Q3: How does Ethereum’s unstaking period compare to other blockchains? A3: Ethereum’s unstaking period is notably longer than some other networks, such as Solana, which has a two-day period. This difference reflects varying network architectures and security priorities. Q4: Does the unstaking period affect ETH stakers? A4: Yes, it means stakers need to plan their liquidity carefully, as their staked ETH is not immediately accessible. It encourages a longer-term commitment to the network, aligning staker interests with Ethereum’s stability. Q5: Could the ETH unstaking period be shortened in the future? A5: While Vitalik Buterin acknowledged the current period might not be “optimal,” any significant shortening would likely require extensive research and network upgrades to ensure security isn’t compromised. For now, the focus remains on maintaining robust network defenses. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread awareness about the critical role of the ETH unstaking period in Ethereum’s security! To learn more about the latest Ethereum trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum’s institutional adoption. This post Crucial ETH Unstaking Period: Vitalik Buterin’s Unwavering Defense for Network Security first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 15:30
USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar

USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar

The post USD/JPY jumps to near 148.30 as Fed Powell’s caution on rate cuts boosts US Dollar appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. USD/JPY climbs to near 148.30 as Fed’s Powell didn’t endorse aggressive dovish stance. Fed’s Powell warns of slowing job demand and upside inflation risks. Japan’s Jibun Bank Manufacturing PMI declines at a faster pace in September. The USD/JPY pair trades 0.45% higher to near 148.30 during the European trading session on Wednesday. The pair gains sharply as the US Dollar (USD) outperforms a majority of its peers, following comments from Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Jerome Powell that the central bank needs to be cautious on further interest rate cuts. During the press time, the US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the Greenback’s value against six major currencies, rises almost 0.4% to near 97.60. The USD Index resumes its upside journey after a two-day corrective move. On Tuesday, Fed’s Powell stated at the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce that the upside inflation risks and labor market concerns have posed a challenging situation for the central bank, which is prompting officials to exercise caution on further monetary policy easing. Powell also stated that the current interest rate range is “well positioned to respond to potential economic developments”. Fed Powell’s comments were similar to statements from Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members St. Louis Fed President Alberto Musalem, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic, and Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack who stated on Monday that the central bank needs to cautious over unwinding monetary policy restrictiveness further, citing persistent inflation risks. Going forward, investors will focus on the US Durable Goods Orders and Personal Consumption Expenditure Price Index (PCE) data for August, which will be released on Thursday and Friday, respectively. In Japan, the manufacturing business activity has declined again in September. Preliminary Jibun Bank Manufacturing PMI data came in lower at 48.4 against 49.7 in August. Economists had anticipated the Manufacturing PMI to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/25 01:31