The post Tesla’s Q4 deliveries slump ~16% to 418,227, below Wall Street forecasts appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tesla on Friday released its Q4 productionThe post Tesla’s Q4 deliveries slump ~16% to 418,227, below Wall Street forecasts appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tesla on Friday released its Q4 production

Tesla’s Q4 deliveries slump ~16% to 418,227, below Wall Street forecasts

Tesla on Friday released its Q4 production and delivery report, with 418,227 deliveries for the quarter, which is well below Wall Street’s 426,000 estimate, according to StreetAccount.

The report also missed the company’s own analyst survey, posted on December 29, which pointed to 422,850 vehicles and a 15% year-over-year drop.

In the report, Tesla said it built 434,358 vehicles during the quarter, 5.5% away from the 459,445 vehicles produced in the same period of 2024. For the full year, deliveries crashed by 8.6% to 1.64 million, down from 1.79 million in 2024, and Tesla’s annual production reached 1.65 million, which is barely ahead of deliveries and far from past growth streaks.

Tesla’s Model 3 and Model Y carry the quarter as Cybertruck stays minor

Tesla said it delivered 406,585 Model 3 and Model Y vehicles in Q4, making up about 97% of all units delivered in the quarter, while the rest came from Model S, Model X, and Cybertruck, which altogether were 11,642 vehicles.

In 2023, Tesla claimed more than 1 million reservations for the Cybertruck, but that has sadly not translated into volume sales, and the angular steel pickup has also not become a major contributor as of Q4 2025.

In Q3, Cryptopolitan reported that Elon Musk’s SpaceX reportedly bought tens of millions of dollars worth of Cybertrucks, but still, that didn’t help Q4 earnings much.

Competition also continued to intensify for Tesla across global markets, mostly from BYD in China, Kia and Hyundai in South Korea, and Volkswagen across Europe. BYD overtook Tesla as the world’s largest EV seller for the calendar year. In a Thursday statement, BYD said sales rose 28% to 2.26 million vehicles.

Politics, incentives, and regional pressure are still weighing on Tesla’s performance

Beyond vehicles, Tesla deployed 14.2 gigawatt hours of battery energy storage products in the fourth quarter, following 12.5 GWh in Q3.

The company will release its full financial results for Q4 on January 28, but did acknowledge that vehicle sales in 2025 were indeed affected by Donald Trump’s decision to end a federal EV incentive by September 30, earlier than planned.

As you should know, Elon spent the first quarter leading the administration’s DOGE initiative to reduce the federal workforce. He later endorsed Germany’s extremist anti-immigrant AfD party and supported British activist Tommy Robinson.

In recent weeks, Elon also called for ending the European Union. Consumer backlash followed in both Europe and the United States.

Despite that response, Tesla shares rallied late in the year. The stock jumped 40% in the third quarter and hit a record in mid-December. Elon bought $1 billion in shares in September. In November, shareholders approved a $1 trillion pay package granting him more control. Critics said the plan set no limits on political activity or time commitment.

Cryptopolitan has earlier reported that Tesla’s European registrations fell 39% in the first eleven months of 2025, according to ACEA. BYD registrations rose 240% in the region. Battery electric vehicles made up about 16% of new European car sales.

Analysts at Cannacord Genuity wrote that adoption “is rising quickly in emerging markets such as Thailand, Vietnam, and Brazil.”

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It’s free.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/teslas-q4-deliveries-slump-16-to-418227/

Market Opportunity
Farcana Logo
Farcana Price(FAR)
$0.000952
$0.000952$0.000952
+5.66%
USD
Farcana (FAR) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00