TLDR Kalshi obtained a temporary restraining order against Tennessee’s enforcement of its cease-and-desist. Tennessee claims sports event contracts are illegal TLDR Kalshi obtained a temporary restraining order against Tennessee’s enforcement of its cease-and-desist. Tennessee claims sports event contracts are illegal

Kalshi And Polymarket Face Legal Battle Over Sports Betting Contract

2026/01/18 17:49
3 min read

TLDR

  • Kalshi obtained a temporary restraining order against Tennessee’s enforcement of its cease-and-desist.
  • Tennessee claims sports event contracts are illegal gambling under state law.
  • The CFTC granted Kalshi status as a federally regulated contract market in 2020.
  • Platforms face a Jan. 31 deadline to void unsettled sports-related trades in Tennessee.

Kalshi and Polymarket, two leading prediction markets, are facing legal scrutiny in Tennessee. The state’s regulator has demanded they halt sports-related event contracts, triggering a legal standoff over whether such trades are federally regulated financial instruments or unlicensed gambling. A court decision could soon determine whether your trades stay active—or are canceled.

On January 9, 2026, the Tennessee Sports Wagering Council issued cease-and-desist letters to Kalshi, Polymarket, and Crypto.com. The letter instructed the platforms to stop offering sports-related event contracts to state residents and to void unsettled trades by January 31. The state claimed the platforms were operating illegal gambling businesses without proper licenses.

Kalshi responded by filing in federal court. The company argues it is a federally regulated entity under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). A federal judge in Nashville granted Kalshi a temporary restraining order on January 12, blocking the state from enforcing the cease-and-desist while the case proceeds. A hearing for a longer-term injunction is scheduled for January 26.

CFTC Oversight vs State Gambling Laws

Kalshi is registered as a designated contract market under the Commodity Exchange Act. This status, granted by the CFTC in 2020, gives it the right to offer derivatives contracts. Kalshi argues that this federal oversight gives the CFTC exclusive authority over its trading platform.

Tennessee, however, argues that if a product functions as sports betting, it must follow state gambling laws. The state said the platforms were violating age restrictions, licensing rules, and consumer protection standards. This places Kalshi and similar platforms in the center of a debate over regulatory control.

The outcome could reshape how prediction markets are treated under U.S. law. It raises the question of whether a yes/no trade on a sports event is gambling or a financial product.

CFTC Rules and Market Uncertainty

The CFTC allows event contracts if they serve an economic purpose and are not related to banned categories such as terrorism or gaming. Under Rule 40.11, contracts referencing “gaming” are restricted. Whether sports contracts fall under this rule remains uncertain.

In 2025, the CFTC issued an advisory noting that some sports-related contracts had been self-certified by exchanges, but the agency had not formally approved them. This ambiguity has left platforms in a difficult position as state regulators challenge their operations.

Nevada previously ruled that Kalshi’s contracts fell under state gambling regulations. That decision is under appeal, but it has encouraged other states to pursue similar actions.

Platforms Caught Between Compliance and Litigation

Faced with state demands, platforms must choose between compliance and litigation. If they comply by geofencing users and voiding trades, they may reduce legal risks but give up the argument that federal law preempts state rules. If they fight, they may face penalties and long court battles.

According to Reuters, Kalshi is currently fighting similar cases in multiple states. Tennessee’s case adds urgency due to its January 31 deadline for user refunds and contract cancellations.

The decision could lead to nationwide access for prediction markets or force them into fragmented, state-by-state compliance structures. As the court battle unfolds, the industry waits to see how regulators will define these products.

The post Kalshi And Polymarket Face Legal Battle Over Sports Betting Contract appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Orderly Network Logo
Orderly Network Price(ORDER)
$0.0569
$0.0569$0.0569
-0.17%
USD
Orderly Network (ORDER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption

The post Coinbase Slams ‘Patchwork’ State Crypto Laws, Calls for Federal Preemption appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Coinbase has filed a letter with the DOJ urging federal preemption of state crypto laws, citing Oregon’s securities suit, New York’s ETH stance, and staking bans. Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal called state actions “government run amok,” warning that patchwork enforcement “slows innovation and harms consumers.” A legal expert told Decrypt that states risk violating interstate commerce rules and due process, and DOJ support for preemption may mark a potential turning point. Coinbase has gone on the offensive against state regulators, petitioning the Department of Justice that a patchwork of lawsuits and licensing schemes is tearing America’s crypto market apart. “When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken,” Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal tweeted on Tuesday. “This isn’t federalism—this is government run amok.” When Oregon can sue us for services that are legal under federal law, something’s broken. This isn’t federalism–this is government run amok. We just sent a letter to @TheJusticeDept urging federal action on crypto market structure to remedy this. 1/3 — paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) September 16, 2025 Coinbase’s filing says that states are “expansively interpreting their securities laws in ways that undermine federal law” and violate the dormant Commerce Clause by projecting regulatory preferences beyond state borders. “The current patchwork of state laws isn’t just inefficient – it slows innovation and harms consumers” and demands “federal action on crypto market structure,” Grewal said.  States vs. Coinbase It pointed to Oregon’s securities lawsuit against the exchange, New York’s bid to classify Ethereum as a security, and cease-and-desist orders on staking as proof that rogue states are trying to resurrect the SEC’s discredited “regulation by enforcement” playbook. Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield sued Coinbase in April for promoting unregistered securities, and in July asked a federal judge to return the…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 11:52
Quantum Computing Crypto Threat Is Exaggerated: CoinShares Reveals Sobering Reality

Quantum Computing Crypto Threat Is Exaggerated: CoinShares Reveals Sobering Reality

The post Quantum Computing Crypto Threat Is Exaggerated: CoinShares Reveals Sobering Reality appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Quantum Computing Crypto Threat
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/09 06:25
Top Crypto Presales for February Include Pepepawn and OPZ, but the Upcoming Crypto That Looks Like a True 100x Thunder Is DeepSnitch AI

Top Crypto Presales for February Include Pepepawn and OPZ, but the Upcoming Crypto That Looks Like a True 100x Thunder Is DeepSnitch AI

Bitcoin had another sharp drop on Feb. 6, falling to $60,000. This caused fear in some investors and panic in others. But seasoned investors know that these falls
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/09 06:00