TLDR Senator Roger Marshall has decided not to offer his credit card swipe fee amendment during the Senate Agriculture Committee’s markup. The amendment’s withdrawalTLDR Senator Roger Marshall has decided not to offer his credit card swipe fee amendment during the Senate Agriculture Committee’s markup. The amendment’s withdrawal

Crypto Bill Moves Forward as Marshall Backs Off Card Fee Proposal

2026/01/27 20:27
3 min read

TLDR

  • Senator Roger Marshall has decided not to offer his credit card swipe fee amendment during the Senate Agriculture Committee’s markup.
  • The amendment’s withdrawal helps clear the path for the crypto bill to move forward without division among Senate Republicans.
  • White House officials were involved in urging Marshall to withdraw the amendment due to concerns it could block the bill’s passage.
  • Senator Durbin, who co-sponsored the swipe fee measure, is not expected to propose the amendment during the markup.
  • The crypto bill would give the Commodity Futures Trading Commission more authority over digital assets like Bitcoin.

Senator Roger Marshall has withdrawn a proposed swipe fee amendment to ensure progress on the crypto bill, which faces other legislative threats, including a looming government shutdown and unresolved bipartisan disagreements.

Credit Card Amendment Pulled After Private Talks

Senator Marshall filed a credit card amendment last week targeting payment network competition on fees. The move mirrored his ongoing Credit Card Competition Act co-sponsored with Senator Dick Durbin. However, he agreed privately on Saturday not to bring up the amendment during Thursday’s Senate Agriculture Committee markup.

The decision followed White House intervention, which viewed the amendment as a direct threat to the crypto bill’s passage. A White House official confirmed that the measure “would have jeopardized” the legislation. Marshall’s withdrawal clears a hurdle for the committee’s first vote on digital asset regulation.

Senator Durbin has not ruled out offering the amendment but is not expected to raise it at the markup. No final decision has been confirmed, leaving a possibility open. Still, its absence reduces tension between financial firms and major retailers clashing over swipe fees.

Crypto Bill Advances Despite Shutdown Threats

The crypto bill now heads to Thursday’s markup as Congress faces a partial shutdown deadline this weekend. Senate Democrats blocked a $1.3 trillion spending package after a fatal Border Patrol shooting in Minneapolis. A shutdown could furlough federal workers and delay further Senate action.

Chairman John Boozman released the crypto bill text without bipartisan backing after negotiations fell apart.

The legislation would expand the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s authority over digital assets such as Bitcoin. The Agriculture Committee’s bill has become the main Senate path after the Banking Committee delayed its own bill. That alternative legislation, known as the CLARITY Act, is now expected in late February or March.

President Trump recently confirmed in Davos that he supports swift passage of crypto market reforms. “We’re working to make sure America remains the crypto capital of the world,” Trump said. His comments added pressure for Republicans to finalize regulatory action.

Ethics Disputes and Election Pressure Add Friction

Senators face growing ethics demands from within their ranks as crypto legislation moves forward. Senator Adam Schiff has called for new rules covering the White House. Senator Ruben Gallego labeled ethics guardrails “a red line” for his support.

Despite these tensions, Patrick Witt from the White House’s Crypto Council urged lawmakers to pass the bill now.

TD Cowen, an investment bank, projected the bill could be delayed until 2027 without fast action. The firm said full implementation might stretch into 2029. Delays could grow as lawmakers shift focus to midterm elections.

For now, Thursday’s markup remains the best chance for crypto legislation to move forward in the Senate. Passage depends on avoiding shutdown delays and managing unresolved party disputes. The committee’s decision to proceed signals urgency despite risks.

The post Crypto Bill Moves Forward as Marshall Backs Off Card Fee Proposal appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00