The post Why Crypto’s Dip is Just as Much a Cultural Problem as a Financial One appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto has made it through 2025 without a totalThe post Why Crypto’s Dip is Just as Much a Cultural Problem as a Financial One appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto has made it through 2025 without a total

Why Crypto’s Dip is Just as Much a Cultural Problem as a Financial One

Crypto has made it through 2025 without a total collapse or a headline scandal. Even so, this is shaping up to be one of the industry’s toughest years yet. For most of the year, things looked solid. Bitcoin climbed steadily and peaked at about $126,000 in October.

That has been more than a 30% rise since January. But that momentum did not last. A mix of pressures has erased those gains. Bitcoin is now down roughly 7% for the year. That is a sharp contrast to the S&P 500, which is up around 15% over the same period. Currently, there is also no clear villain for the industry to point to. 

The tough U.S. regulators from the Biden era are no longer there. They have been replaced by a government that openly supports crypto and is led by a president who calls himself pro-crypto. Congress is moving forward with laws the industry has backed. Big institutions have also invested, pouring billions into Bitcoin exchange-traded funds. Yet, despite all that support, crypto is still struggling to find stable ground. 

Who is Responsible for the Current Downturn?

Bitcoin has been hovering near $90,000 in recent weeks. Then another wave of sales hit the market. That drop pushed the price down again, this time to around $86,000. If people in the crypto world are looking for someone to blame for this downturn, they may need to look inward. There are some clear technical reasons behind the slide.

One of the biggest was the heavy buildup of leveraged trades. These are risky bets that can magnify gains but also lead to sharp losses. Many of those positions vanished during a sudden market crash in early October. Still, the weakness in prices feels deeper than a simple aftershock from that event.

The appetite for risk has not disappeared more broadly. The tech-focused Nasdaq has actually outperformed the wider stock market. That raises an obvious question. Why are investors avoiding crypto while taking risks elsewhere?

A Cultural Problem

One possible answer is the culture around the crypto itself. Despite years of talk about maturity, parts of the industry still feel stuck in the past. That is making many potential investors uneasy. This year, crypto supporters got almost everything they wanted on the legal and regulatory front. 

Even so, the industry has failed to deal with its ongoing image problems. Scammers, hackers, and online trolls remain highly visible. Many of them seem unaware or uninterested in the idea that crypto is trying to clean up its reputation.

Over the summer, promoters of memecoins even took credit for throwing sex toys onto WNBA courts. They said it was their way of making memes “funny again.” Episodes like that only reinforce the sense that parts of the space are not taking themselves seriously.

More damaging are the everyday scams. Crypto ATM fraud has become widespread. In the United States alone, these schemes have cost victims more than $330 million this year.

There have also been more extreme cases. Criminals have targeted crypto investors directly, kidnapping them to force access to their digital wallets. Industry researcher Chainalysis reports that more than 30 of these wrench attacks have occurred this year. Many cases likely go unreported.

One case grabbed national attention in the summer, when a 28-year-old investor escaped from a luxury apartment in Manhattan. He accused two men of holding him for weeks, beating him, and threatening to kill him unless he handed over his crypto passwords.

Is Investing in Crypto a Bad Idea?

None of this means that investing in crypto is automatically a bad idea. Many people still believe crypto is the future, and one quiet bright spot amid the cultural shift is how crypto is finding much simpler everyday footholds.

Experts point to bitcoin casinos as a low-friction entry point where millions of casual users are dipping into BTC just to play a few games on their phones. For those curious about getting started safely, it is crucial to find the website that breaks down the easiest and most secure casino payment options available.

Still, it is hardly comforting that crypto is the way. That is especially true for people who bought Bitcoin near its recent high. They are now facing heavy losses. 

Cornell University economist Eswar Prasad said everyday investors are in a tough spot. He said many people struggle between fear of missing out on a promising opportunity and discomfort with crypto’s darker side and its loudest promoters.

According to him, that tension tends to exaggerate price swings, pushing markets sharply up and down. He added that this pattern looks very similar to what is happening now.

Bitcoin’s latest surge, which followed President Donald Trump’s re-election, pulled in a wave of new investors. Many of them primarily focused on rising prices, not on the politics or culture surrounding crypto. Prasad said that once the financial momentum faded, there was little to convince those newcomers to stay.

He noted that while retail investors are willing to test the waters, they are just as quick to step back when things start to look uncertain. In his view, the doubts people have long had about crypto are resurfacing, and that is weighing heavily on confidence across the market.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2026/01/28/why-cryptos-dip-is-just-as-much-a-cultural-problem-as-a-financial-one/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00