TLDR Brian Armstrong was dismissed by JPMorgan and other bank leaders at Davos. Top banks oppose stablecoin rewards, seeing them as a threat to deposit models. TLDR Brian Armstrong was dismissed by JPMorgan and other bank leaders at Davos. Top banks oppose stablecoin rewards, seeing them as a threat to deposit models.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong Faces Rejection From U.S. Bank Leaders in Davos

2026/01/31 03:21
3 min read

TLDR

  • Brian Armstrong was dismissed by JPMorgan and other bank leaders at Davos.
  • Top banks oppose stablecoin rewards, seeing them as a threat to deposit models.
  • Armstrong argues that the CLARITY Act limits competition in the crypto market.
  • Despite the standoff, Coinbase has ties with JPMorgan and Citigroup.

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s meetings with top executives from major U.S. banks ended in stark dismissal. Armstrong attempted to lobby these leaders about the ongoing crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act, but was met with strong resistance.

The tension centers around stablecoin rewards, which Armstrong advocates. These rewards function like interest on stablecoin holdings, offering up to 3.5% returns. However, leaders from prominent banks, such as JPMorgan Chase’s Jamie Dimon, Bank of America’s Brian Moynihan, and Wells Fargo’s Charlie Scharf, view these rewards as a direct challenge to their traditional deposit models.

The Clash Over Stablecoin Rewards and Banking Models

The heart of the dispute revolves around how stablecoin rewards may disrupt traditional banking operations. Armstrong argues that the reward systems function similarly to high-yield savings accounts, providing consumers with a viable alternative to depositing money in traditional banks. For crypto firms like Coinbase, these rewards represent a key feature that appeals to users seeking higher returns on their assets.

However, banks perceive these rewards as a threat to their deposit-based services. When users switch their assets to stablecoins for higher yields, traditional banks could face a decrease in funds available for lending, thus impacting their core business model. Dimon, in one of the reported exchanges, dismissed Armstrong’s position, stating “You are full of s—,” signaling his deep opposition to Armstrong’s argument.

The CLARITY Act’s Role in the Future of Digital Finance

The CLARITY Act, a piece of proposed legislation, has become a focal point for the ongoing dispute. This bill could determine who is allowed to issue stablecoins and under what regulatory framework. While Armstrong and Coinbase oppose the current version of the bill, they believe it is overly influenced by traditional banking interests seeking to protect their financial turf.

Brian Moynihan of Bank of America, during a brief meeting with Armstrong, reinforced the bank’s position, advising him that if Coinbase wanted to engage in banking services, it should simply “be a bank.” This statement highlights the divide between traditional financial institutions and the evolving crypto industry.

Despite these confrontations, Coinbase continues to maintain relationships with several major banks, including JPMorgan and Citigroup, which complicates the narrative of total opposition between the sectors.

The Broader Industry Divide and the Path Forward for Crypto and Banks

Despite the frosty reception Armstrong faced, the relationship between crypto platforms like Coinbase and traditional financial institutions is not entirely adversarial. Coinbase’s existing partnerships with banks like JPMorgan and Citigroup underscore a more nuanced relationship. The ongoing dispute suggests that both sectors recognize the potential of digital finance but differ in how to regulate it.

As the debate over the future of stablecoins and crypto regulations continues, the key issue remains: Who will shape the next phase of digital finance? Will it be driven by the traditional banking sector, or will newer players like Coinbase and others in the crypto space dictate the rules? This question will likely determine the trajectory of both industries in the coming years.

The post Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong Faces Rejection From U.S. Bank Leaders in Davos appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Relax, Core v30 Won’t Kill Bitcoin

Relax, Core v30 Won’t Kill Bitcoin

The post Relax, Core v30 Won’t Kill Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways The rhetoric on Crypto Twitter has been heating up between Core and Knots in the OP_RETURN saga, as Bitcoin news takes on a new route. Despite some back and forth, Blockstream CEO Adam Back declared he would run Bitcoin Core v30 Despite believing the upgrade will open the network to more spam, Bitcoin OG Jimmy Song reminds people panicking that Core v30 won’t kill Bitcoin In case you missed it, the Bitcoin community is in full battle mode over Bitcoin Core v30 and the so-called OP_RETURN drama. Just mention “Core v30” in a crowded Discord and watch the fireworks. On one side, you’ve got the Bitcoin Knots faithful grabbing pitchforks and talking about the soul of the network; on the other, the Core devs, who take a more laissez-faire approach. Bitcoin News: What’s Actually Happening in Core vs Knots At the heart of the storm? Bitcoin Core’s decision to vastly expand the OP_RETURN data limit in Bitcoin Core v30. For years, Bitcoin’s OP_RETURN opcode, a line of script that lets users immutably store tiny amounts of data on the blockchain, was capped at 80 bytes. With Core v30, that ceiling is yanked off, allowing payloads up to the full block size (nearly 4MB). Proponents see big wins here: more flexibility for on-chain applications, support for digital notarization, and enhanced Layer 2 infrastructure. Critics, especially in the Knots camp, warn that this opens the door to chain bloat, endless spam, and a deviation from Bitcoin’s monetary roots. Knots developers, most notably Luke Dashjr and Samson Mow, argue that without limits, Bitcoin risks becoming a dumping ground for arbitrary data. A fate that would make running a node costly and possibly restrict network participation to large players. Since the Core update was finalized, Knots’ market share of full nodes has…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/24 14:15
United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
Pi Network Tech Upgrade Unlocks Mainnet Migration for 2.5 Million Users and Introduces Palm Print Security

Pi Network Tech Upgrade Unlocks Mainnet Migration for 2.5 Million Users and Introduces Palm Print Security

Pi Network has announced a major technological breakthrough that marks a new chapter in its evolution. According to information shared by Twitter user @strong3
Share
Hokanews2026/02/07 12:28