Bitcoin’s latest sell-off was not driven by a sudden shift in fundamentals or unexpected news.
According to a CryptoQuant report, the move was a classic liquidity-driven cascade, where forced liquidations, not discretionary selling, accelerated downside momentum and pushed price below the $79,000 level.
Within roughly 12 hours, the market recorded around $1.3 billion in liquidations, as leveraged long positions were automatically closed by exchanges. These liquidations executed as market orders, hitting thin order books and reinforcing the decline. Once initiated, the process became self-reinforcing: lower prices triggered more liquidations, which in turn pushed prices even lower.
In crypto derivatives markets, liquidation occurs when a leveraged position no longer meets margin requirements. When that threshold is breached, the exchange forcibly closes the position to protect itself from loss.
The structural problem is execution. Liquidations do not wait for favorable pricing; they are executed immediately at market. In periods of thin liquidity, this creates abrupt price gaps and sharp wicks, even in the absence of large spot sellers.
For retail traders, this means the primary risk is often not being wrong on market direction, but being over-leveraged in an environment where liquidity can disappear quickly.
CryptoQuant’s long-term liquidation data highlights how this mechanism has repeatedly shaped major market drawdowns.
During 2019–2020, the derivatives market was still immature. High leverage combined with shallow liquidity meant that even modest price declines triggered cascading long liquidations. This dynamic culminated in the March 2020 COVID crash, where forced selling compressed into a short window and amplified the collapse.
Since then, market structure has improved. Liquidity is deeper and leverage is better distributed. However, liquidation risk has not disappeared — it has only become more episodic.
Several large-scale liquidation events illustrate how leverage unwinds during periods of stress:
On-chain analysis later showed that actual realized losses in BTC and ETH during the October 2025 event were closer to $2.31 billion, underscoring that these episodes are primarily leverage unwinds, not true capital destruction.
The current decline followed this familiar template. Headlines acted as a catalyst, but the real driver was flow and liquidity, not a fundamental reassessment of Bitcoin’s value. Once price entered thin liquidity zones, forced liquidations did the rest.
For retail participants, the takeaway is structural rather than directional. Survival in crypto markets depends less on predicting tops and bottoms, and more on building positions that can endure volatility without being forcibly closed.
In liquidation-driven markets, the critical question is not how far price can go up, but how much downside a position can survive.
The post Bitcoin Liquidations Expose Retail Risk as Liquidity Breaks Down appeared first on ETHNews.


Read the full article at coingape.com.
