“What divides us here isn’t some fundamental disagreement on both sides,” US Senator Cory Booker said Thursday of crypto market structure legislation. Credit: Shutterstock“What divides us here isn’t some fundamental disagreement on both sides,” US Senator Cory Booker said Thursday of crypto market structure legislation. Credit: Shutterstock

Crypto bill advances in Senate committee despite Democrats’ Trump, DeFi concerns

2026/01/30 05:31
4 min read

US Senators in the Agriculture Committee advanced crypto market structure legislation along party lines on Thursday.

Republicans voted to advance the bill, which details rules for the trading of so-called digital commodities and includes protections for developers of decentralised financial protocols.

“In order to protect American consumers, onshore innovation, and allow US businesses to continue to grow and prosper, we must grant the CFTC regulatory authority over the spot market trading of digital commodities,” Committee Chair John Boozman, a Republican from Arkansas, said ahead of the vote.

“Advancing this bill is the first step, and there are many steps to come in achieving those goals.”

Familiar fault lines emerged during the vote, with Democrats saying they couldn’t support a bill that allowed President Donald Trump to enrich himself with crypto as he pushes for a bill that has the potential to bring the asset class into the mainstream.

Democrats also said they wouldn’t support a bill that failed to guarantee Democratic representation on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, one of two key financial regulators in the US.

The body is currently led single-handedly by Trump appointee Michael Selig. Historically, the CFTC and other regulatory commissions have had a mix of both Democrats and Republicans.

One senator even suggested decentralised finance remains a sticking point.

“We keep talking about this thing called DeFi. Go and have a town hall and talk to your constituents about DeFi and see how many of them are going to be able to talk about it with clarity,” Senator Ben Ray Luján, a Democrat from New Mexico, said.

“There are loopholes that terrorists and cartels are using today that the United States knows about,” he later said, adding that the details weren’t widely known because such reports had been classified.

The road ahead

Even as Republicans advanced the bill, its wider prospects remain in doubt. A companion bill in the Senate Banking Committee, which details which digital assets should fall under the purview of the Securities and Exchange Commission, was scheduled for a similar vote earlier this month.

But that vote was cancelled at the last minute after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said he could not support the bill, citing its ban on stablecoin yield and its stringent anti-money laundering provisions, among other things.

Both bills will have to be combined before they can go to the full senate for a vote. And Senate rules mean any bill will need to secure bipartisan support.

Should a combined bill earn the chamber’s support, it will have to be reconciled with a version that passed the House of Representatives last summer.

Those obstacles will be difficult to scale in an election year.

The Trump conundrum

The Trump family’s foray into crypto remains a key issue for Senate Democrats.

“The White House has made this infinitely harder,” New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, the bill’s lead Democrat negotiator, said on Thursday.

“I have had private conversations with republican colleagues and staffers that agree with me. … The fact that Donald Trump is grifting on crypto himself, it’s like me creating a Cory coin,” he added, calling it “ridiculous.”

Other Senators complained about the lack of Democrats on the CFTC.

“We can’t give the CFTC this broad new authority when it only has one Republican member,” Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat from Minnesota, said.

Republicans rejected a series of proposed Democrat amendments, including ones that would limit federal officials’ ability to profit off crypto and that would bar crypto companies from receiving taxpayer-funded bailouts.

Boozman said the amendments were either beyond the scope of the bill or best handled by the Senate Banking committee.

Still, Booker said he was hopeful a crypto market structure bill could earn bipartisan support.

“What divides us here isn’t some fundamental disagreement on both sides,” he said. “We’ve got this short distance with a clear path forward.”

Aleks Gilbert is DL News’ New York-based DeFi correspondent. You can reach him at aleks@dlnews.com.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00