Trove Markets aims to combine two popular trends: collectables investing and leverage trading. Illustration: Hilary B; Credit: © OLM/The Pokemon Company, via YouTubeTrove Markets aims to combine two popular trends: collectables investing and leverage trading. Illustration: Hilary B; Credit: © OLM/The Pokemon Company, via YouTube

Investors in crypto exchange for Pokémon cards furious as they lose 98% of their investments

2026/01/21 18:42
4 min read

Investors in a purported crypto exchange that lets users bet on the prices of collectables like rare Pokémon cards have been left in the lurch after the project’s token crashed more than 98% mere minutes after it launched.

On January 11, Trove Markets raised $11.5 million from investors through a token sale conducted on Hyperliquid, the buzzy blockchain tied to the $5.4 billion crypto exchange of the same name.

But a last-minute switch from building the exchange on Hyperliquid, coupled with allegations that the project’s team had misused funds and engaged in misleading marketing, obliterated investor confidence.

When Trove launched its token on Monday, it immediately crashed some 98% from a market value of around $21 million to just $330,000.

Now, thousands of investors are looking for answers.

“My $20,000 investment… should have resulted in $14,000 USDC back and $6,000 in $TROVE,” said one investor. “Due to the token giga nuking, they gave me in total $600 back.”

Trove’s anonymous developers said they have refunded just over $2.4 million to early investors, but will keep the remaining $9.4 million raised to continue building a futures exchange on Solana, a rival blockchain.

“Trove is not disappearing,” the developers said in a Monday X post. “We are not ‘taking the money and running.’”

4,000% return

Trove aims to combine two of the most popular trends among crypto investors: collectables investing and leverage trading.

Its stated goal is to create a perpetual futures exchange for trading in-demand collectables, including rare Pokémon trading cards and Counter Strike 2 gun skins. Traders will be able to take on leverage that can juice gains — or exacerbate losses.

With the value of Pokémon cards soaring and investors piling into them at an unprecedented rate, investor interest in a platform based around trading the collectables was high.

Pokémon cards, as measured through the Card Ladder Index, have produced a roughly 4,000% cumulative return since 2004, vastly outperforming the S&P 500, an index of the top 500 US stocks, which is up 513% over the same period.

Over the past three months, Pokémon cards have seen a 20% return.

In comparison, Bitcoin is down some 15% over the same period.

Counter Strike 2 gun skins, cosmetic items in the popular first-person shooter game, hit an all-time high market value of $4.2 billion in March.

The market crashed by some $3 billion in October after the game’s creator, Valve, added new ways to obtain rare skins.

Accusations mount

Even before Trove’s token launched and plummeted in value, critics were raising the alarm over the project’s suspicious behaviour.

They’ve accused Trove of paying influencers to promote the project to their followers without disclosure, while offering them discounts to participate in the token sale.

Several critics have posted screenshots of conversations on social media that appear to show a member of Trove’s team soliciting influencers for paid promotions and offering discounts. DL News could not independently verify the veracity of the screenshots.

On January 17, pseudonymous crypto investigator ZachXBT posted an onchain analysis, which he said shows Trove’s developers sending $45,000 raised from investors to the deposit address of a crypto casino. DL News did not independently confirm his analysis.

Trove has yet to respond to these allegations publicly and didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment.

The project said it has committed portions of the funds it raised to pay for its developer team, operating expenses, and paying influencers to market the project, among other things.

Investors still threw more than $11 million at the project.

Crypto token sales have become increasingly popular in recent months as US President Donald Trump’s administration takes a more lenient approach to crypto regulation.

Such sales give investors the chance to get in on a project very early — usually before it has launched.

Previous early-stage token sales have generated huge returns. It’s for this reason that investors often overlook the risks associated with them.

Tim Craig is DL News’ Edinburgh-based DeFi Correspondent. Reach out with tips at tim@dlnews.com.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00