The post HBAR Technical Analysis Feb 3 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. HBAR has risen over 4% daily, successfully testing critical support at 0.09$, with RSIThe post HBAR Technical Analysis Feb 3 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. HBAR has risen over 4% daily, successfully testing critical support at 0.09$, with RSI

HBAR Technical Analysis Feb 3

HBAR has risen over 4% daily, successfully testing critical support at 0.09$, with RSI at 32.79 approaching oversold territory, setting the stage for a potential rebound; however, the overall downtrend and Bitcoin’s bearish signals may limit short-term optimism.

Market Outlook and Current Situation

Hedera Hashgraph’s native token HBAR is trading at 0.09$ after recording a 4.14% rise in the last 24 hours. The daily range is stuck between 0.09$-0.10$, and although trading volume has reached 103.54 million dollars, the overall market trend continues downward. This movement appears partially supported by Bitcoin’s 3.92% gain in an environment where altcoin season is weak, but HBAR remaining below EMA20 (0.10$) maintains short-term bearish pressure.

While market-wide volatility is at low levels, HBAR is attempting to stabilize after losses of up to 20% in recent weeks. In our multi-timeframe (MTF) analysis, we identified a total of 11 strong levels across 1D, 3D, and 1W charts: 2 supports/2 resistances on 1D, 1 support/2 resistances on 3D, and 2 supports/4 resistances confluence on 1W. These confluences indicate that the price will be stuck in the 0.0839$-0.0994$ range, and the breakout direction will determine the trend.

In the long-term perspective, HBAR is affected by the macro downtrend despite institutional developments in its ecosystem. Although the volume increase reflects speculative buying, it suggests a cautious approach when combined with the Supertrend indicator’s bearish signal. Investors can access detailed data from the HBAR Spot Analysis pages to evaluate their positions.

Technical Analysis: Key Levels to Watch

Support Zones

The strongest support level stands out at 0.0839$ (score: 76/100); this level is at the intersection of Fibonacci retracement on 1D and 1W timeframes with weekly lows. If price pulls back here, aggressive buying may come, but a breakdown would target the next 0.0469$ bearish level. The second support at 0.0907$ (61/100) is just below the current price and aligns with the 24-hour low; this will serve as a short-term hold point.

These supports are strengthened by MTF confluences. For example, the 0.0839$ level on the 3D chart aligns with the high-volume POC of the volume profile, increasing reversal potential. However, in the overall downtrend, a breakdown of these levels could trigger deeper corrections.

Resistance Barriers

The first resistance is at 0.0932$ (63/100), near EMA20 and coinciding with the local high of the recent rise. A close above it could turn momentum bullish. The more critical 0.0994$ (66/100) resistance is at the intersection of Supertrend resistance and 1D pivot; this is the key threshold for breakout.

The strength of the resistances is supported by 4 strong barriers on the 1W timeframe. If price advances toward 0.10$, leveraged opportunities can be evaluated via HBAR Futures Analysis, but false breakout risk is high.

Momentum Indicators and Trend Strength

RSI (32.79) is approaching the oversold threshold (30), signaling short-term recovery; divergence is observed, which may indicate seller exhaustion. MACD maintains negative momentum with a bearish histogram, trading below the signal line, and requires a close above 0.0932$ for crossover.

EMAs are in bearish alignment: Price is below EMA20 (0.10$), with EMA50 (0.105$) and EMA200 (0.12$) higher up. Supertrend is bearish with resistance at 0.11$. Trend strength measured by ADX is around 25, indicating moderate downtrend dominance. If RSI divergence strengthens on the 4H timeframe, a bullish divergence could target 0.1358$.

Overall, momentum is weakly bearish, but oversold conditions open the door for a rebound. Rising volume in the volume oscillator confirms buyers entering.

Risk Assessment and Trading Outlook

The risk/reward ratio in the bullish scenario is around 1:2.5 with a 0.1358$ target (score 30) and 0.0839$ stop-loss; on the bearish side, 0.0469$ target (score 22) with 0.0994$ stop offers a similar ratio. The general outlook is neutral-bearish, with short bias prevailing unless the downtrend breaks. With low volatility, BTC movements will be decisive.

A breakout above 0.0994$ is required for bullish outlook; in that case, the 0.11$-0.1358$ range is targeted. In the bearish scenario, a close below 0.0839$ opens the way to 0.07$. Risk management is critical: Position size should be limited to 1-2%, trailing stops recommended.

Bitcoin Correlation

HBAR shows high correlation with BTC (0.85+); BTC’s downtrend and Supertrend bearish signal give a caution signal for altcoins. While BTC seeks support at 78,509$, main supports are 78,426$, 74,604$, and 63,235$. For HBAR recovery, BTC needs to break 79,312$ resistance; otherwise, if BTC retreats to 74,604$, HBAR will test 0.0839$.

BTC resistances are 79,312$, 83,548$, and 87,762$; rejection from here pressures HBAR. Rising BTC dominance will hinder altcoin rallies; HBAR traders should prioritize monitoring BTC levels.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Strategy Analyst: David Kim

Macro market analysis and portfolio management

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/hbar-technical-analysis-february-3-2026-market-commentary-support-and-resistance-and-price-targets

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00