The post TON Technical Analysis Feb 3 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TON showed a 3.85% rise in 24 hours within its dominant downtrend structure, reachingThe post TON Technical Analysis Feb 3 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TON showed a 3.85% rise in 24 hours within its dominant downtrend structure, reaching

TON Technical Analysis Feb 3

TON showed a 3.85% rise in 24 hours within its dominant downtrend structure, reaching the $1.37 level, but since it couldn’t stay above EMA20 ($1.51), it gives a limited recovery signal. RSI at 31.93 is approaching the oversold region, MACD is bearish, and Supertrend resistance is prominent at $1.60; critical support at $1.25 should be monitored.

Executive Summary

TON’s technical chart reflects a limited short-term recovery under overall downtrend dominance. While the price stabilizes at $1.37, despite RSI giving an oversold signal, the negative MACD histogram and failure to hold above EMA20 limit upside potential. Critical support zone is in the $1.25-$1.37 range, resistance in the $1.38-$1.48 band; Bitcoin’s bearish Supertrend is creating pressure on altcoins. In risk/reward ratio, bearish targets ($0.95) carry low confidence score (22%), while bullish target $1.81 (46%) may offer a medium-term opportunity but volume support is insufficient. Strategic approach: Focus on support hold, follow TON Spot Analysis or TON Futures Analysis on upside breakout.

Market Structure and Trend Status

Current Trend Analysis

TON’s big picture continues under downtrend dominance; the price is positioned at the lower end of the descending channel in weekly and daily timeframes. The 3.85% rise in the last 24 hours ($1.32-$1.39 range) indicates a local reaction buy but the overall trend structure remains intact. The Supertrend indicator gives a bearish signal and marks $1.60 as a significant resistance. Multi-timeframe analysis (1D/3D/1W) detects 13 strong levels: 2 supports/3 resistances on 1D, 1 support on 3D, 3 supports/4 resistances on 1W distribution, confirming the structural strength of the downtrend. The limited recovery stems from oversold conditions, requiring a close above EMA20 ($1.51) for upward movement.

Structural Levels

Structural supports stand out at $1.2500 (score: 73/100, strong weekly low) and $1.3665 (score: 64/100, daily pivot); a drop below these levels could accelerate bearish momentum to $0.95. Resistance zones are lined up at $1.3768 (score: 70/100, near-term high), $1.4340 (score: 61/100), and $1.4790 (score: 63/100). The price is currently balancing at $1.37 above the $1.3665 support; consolidation in this range signals calm before volatility.

Technical Indicators Report

Momentum Indicators

RSI(14) at 31.93 is close to the oversold region, carrying short-term reaction buy potential but trend change is not confirmed without crossing above 50. MACD is bearish; negative histogram and crossover below the signal line show momentum remains in decline. Secondary momentum indicators like Stochastic and CCI also exhibit similar bearish bias; persistence in the 20-30 range on RSI should be monitored for local bottom formation.

Trend Indicators

Price is absent above EMA20 ($1.51) and EMA50 ($1.62), giving bearish short/medium-term signal. Supertrend is in bearish mode, trailing $1.60 resistance. Price below Ichimoku Cloud, Tenkan/Kijun crossover bearish; this configuration supports downtrend continuation. Bollinger Bands contraction signals squeeze before volatility explosion – probable upside breakout target $1.48, downside $1.25.

Critical Support and Resistance Analysis

Supports: $1.3665 (64/100, local low/pivot confluence), $1.2500 (73/100, strong psychological/weekly support, Fibonacci 0.618 retracement). If this level doesn’t hold, risk of drop to $1.10 increases. Resistance: $1.3768 (70/100, 24h high/Fib 0.236), $1.4340 (61/100), $1.4790 (63/100, near EMA50). On upside breakout, $1.8060 bullish target (score 46/100, medium confidence). Multi-TF confluence: 1W resistance $1.48, 3D support $1.25 – these levels have 80%+ reaction rate, ideal for trade setups.

Volume and Market Participation

24h volume at $45.64M is moderate; insufficient volume increase during the rise (3.85% gain vs no 20% volume rise) confirms weak buying interest. OBV (On-Balance Volume) shows negative divergence, supporting downtrend volume. VWAP around $1.35, above price – institutional participation low. In volume profile, $1.37 POC (Point of Control) dominates; $60M+ volume breakout necessary for increase.

Risk Assessment

From current $1.37, bullish target $1.8060 (risk/reward: 1:2.3, 32% rise, score 46/100), bearish $0.9475 (1:3.1 downside, score 22/100 low confidence). Main risks: BTC downtrend pressure, fakeouts in low volume, overall market risk-off. Positioning: For long, $1.3665 stop-loss, targets $1.48/1.81; short invalidation above $1.3768. Expect volatility 4-6%, max drawdown 15% (support break). Positive scenario: RSI divergence + volume spike; negative: BTC below $78K.

Bitcoin Correlation

TON, like altcoins, has high correlation with BTC (0.85+ 1W), BTC at $78,570 in downtrend (Supertrend bearish). BTC supports $78,466/$76,306 should be monitored – breakdown triggers 10%+ drop in altcoins, pushing TON to $1.25. BTC resistance above $79,339/83,548 opens buying rally, clearing room for TON bullish targets ($1.48+). Dominance rise (BTC Supertrend bearish) poses altcoin rotation risk; BTC levels primary filter in TON trades.

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

TON chart offers oversold bounce potential within downtrend, but EMA’s and MACD bearish confluence limit upside. $1.37 consolidation prepares for $1.3768 breakout or $1.3665 breakdown; volume confirmation essential. Medium-term BTC dependency high, long bias if $1.25 holds, short on breakdown. Strategy: Range trade ($1.37-$1.38), 3-5x leverage on futures. For detailed spot/futures, review TON Spot Analysis and TON Futures Analysis. Overall outlook: Caution – wait for confluence for upside momentum.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Senior Technical Analyst: James Mitchell

6 years of crypto market analysis

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/ton-comprehensive-technical-analysis-detailed-review-of-february-3-2026

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00