PANews reported on February 9th that, according to SoSoValue data, the Ethereum spot ETF saw a net outflow of $16.7455 million on February 6th (Eastern Time). ThePANews reported on February 9th that, according to SoSoValue data, the Ethereum spot ETF saw a net outflow of $16.7455 million on February 6th (Eastern Time). The

Ethereum spot ETFs saw a total net outflow of $16.7455 million in February, marking the third consecutive day of net outflows.

2026/02/09 12:57
1 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

PANews reported on February 9th that, according to SoSoValue data, the Ethereum spot ETF saw a net outflow of $16.7455 million on February 6th (Eastern Time).

The Ethereum spot ETF with the largest net inflow on February 6 was the Bitwise ETF ETHW, with a single-day net inflow of $11.7978 million. The total historical net inflow of ETHW has now reached $423 million.

Ethereum spot ETFs saw a total net outflow of $16.7455 million in February, marking the third consecutive day of net outflows.

The second largest inflow was into Grayscale's Ethereum Mini Trust ETF (ETH), with a net inflow of $6.7995 million in a single day. The total historical net inflow into ETH has now reached $1.659 billion.

The Ethereum spot ETF with the largest net outflow on February 6 was the BlackRock ETF ETHA, with a single-day net outflow of $45.4381 million. Currently, the total historical net inflow of ETHA is $12.09 billion.

As of press time, the Ethereum spot ETF has a total net asset value of $11.966 billion, an ETF net asset ratio (market capitalization as a percentage of Ethereum's total market capitalization) of 4.83%, and a historical cumulative net inflow of $11.809 billion.

Market Opportunity
Ethereum Logo
Ethereum Price(ETH)
$2,018.35
$2,018.35$2,018.35
-2.69%
USD
Ethereum (ETH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

The Role of Reference Points in Achieving Equilibrium Efficiency in Fair and Socially Just Economies

This article explores how a simple change in the reference point can achieve a Pareto-efficient equilibrium in both free and fair economies and those with social justice.
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/17 22:30
Metaplanet raises $1.4B to fuel BTC purchases and U.S. subsidiary launch

Metaplanet raises $1.4B to fuel BTC purchases and U.S. subsidiary launch

Metaplanet Inc. has formalized the subsidiary in Miami, Florida, naming it Metaplanet Income Corp.
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/17 23:34
Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns

The post Bitcoin devs cheer block reconstruction stats, ignore security budget concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This morning, Bitcoin Core developers celebrated improved block reconstruction statistics for node operators while conveniently ignoring the reason for these statistics — the downward trend in fees for Bitcoin’s security budget. Reacting with heart emojis and thumbs up to a green chart showing over 80% “successful compact block reconstructions without any requested transactions,” they conveniently omitted red trend lines of the fees that Bitcoin users pay for mining security which powered those green statistics. Block reconstructions occur when a node requests additional information about transactions within a compact block. Although compact blocks allow nodes to quickly relay valid bundles of transactions across the internet, the more frequently that nodes can reconstruct without extra, cumbersome transaction requests from their peers is a positive trend. Because so many nodes switched over in August to relay transactions bidding 0.1 sat/vB across their mempools, nodes now have to request less transaction data to reconstruct blocks containing sub-1 sat/vB transactions. After nodes switched over in August to accept and relay pending transactions bidding less than 1 sat/vB, disparate mempools became harmonized as most nodes had a better view of which transactions would likely join upcoming blocks. As a result, block reconstruction times improved, as nodes needed less information about these sub-1 sat/vB transactions. In July, several miners admitted that user demand for Bitcoin blockspace had persisted at such a low that they were willing to accept transaction fees of just 0.1 satoshi per virtual byte — 90% lower than their prior 1 sat/vB minimum. With so many blocks partially empty, they succumbed to the temptation to accept at least something — even 1 billionth of one bitcoin (BTC) — rather than $0 to fill up some of the excess blockspace. Read more: Bitcoin’s transaction fees have fallen to a multi-year low Green stats for block reconstruction after transaction fees crash After…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:07