From Big Bass slots to a real-world marlin tournament paying in BTC, here’s why this competition shows just how far Bitcoin has come. The post From Big Bass to From Big Bass slots to a real-world marlin tournament paying in BTC, here’s why this competition shows just how far Bitcoin has come. The post From Big Bass to

From Big Bass to Big Bitcoin: A Marlin Tournament Paying in BTC

2026/02/13 20:04
5 min read

I’ve linked crypto and fish together exactly once in my life, and it wasn’t through some high-brow “Bitcoin meets boating” moment. It was me spinning Pragmatic’s Big Bass variants like an absolute degenerate and watching cartoon fish fling multipliers around the screen.

So when I randomly stumbled across the Bitcoin Marlin World Challenge, it genuinely stopped me for a second.

Not because “fishing + crypto” is some natural combo (it isn’t), but because it shows just how far Bitcoin has pushed into the mainstream.

We’re not talking about a niche online event paying out to a handful of early adopters. This is a global, real-world competition built around a prize pool that can be paid in Bitcoin.

That alone says a great deal about where we stand in 2026.

What the Bitcoin Marlin World Challenge Is

At its core, it’s a quarterly, international marlin tournament where anglers can fish from qualifying regions worldwide. Weigh in at approved stations and submit results digitally for verification.

The key bits that stood out to me:

  • It’s global and virtual in terms of submissions (you fish where you are, you don’t all need to be physically in the same place)
  • It runs quarterly, with set windows through 2026 and into early 2027
  • It has specific qualifying thresholds (not just “biggest fish wins”)
  • Winners can receive payouts in BTC or USD

The structure is built around a “rollover” concept as well. If nobody lands a qualifying fish in a category, that prize pool carries over to the next quarter. Entries remain active until the challenge is won.

Bitcoin Marlin tier 3 detailsLevel 3 is the top-tier Lightning Grander, offering a $21,000 USD payout for the heaviest qualifying 1,000+ lb Black or Blue Marlin.

Why This Hit Different (And Why It’s Not Just a Gimmick)

I’ve seen plenty of crypto marketing in sports. Most of it feels like branding slapped on top of a normal event: logo here, ad there, a sponsor talking about “the future”.

This feels a bit more… intentional.

The tournament rules are framed around legit compliance (IGFA-style rule alignment, accredited weigh stations, documentation requirements, verification). It’s trying to look and feel like a serious competition first, with Bitcoin simply being the payout rail.

And that’s the part that got me thinking:

Bitcoin isn’t being positioned here as a speculative toy. It’s being used as a real prize currency for a real-world competition where people spend money to enter.

That’s mainstream behaviour.

Other Competitions That Have Paid Out in Bitcoin (A Few Quick Examples)

This marlin tournament isn’t the first time Bitcoin has shown up in prize pools, but it’s one of the cleaner “real-world sport meets BTC payout” setups I’ve seen.

A few notable examples that made me raise an eyebrow:

  • Esports: Thunderpick’s CS tournament circuit has promoted prize pools paid out in Bitcoin (a proper, mainstream game title with a traditional esports audience)
  • Virtual sport/cycling: MyWhoosh has run a monthly “Treasure Hunt” challenge with winners sharing a fixed fraction of a Bitcoin
  • Classic “Bitcoin aged like fine wine” story: there was a well-known StarCraft tournament back in 2011 where 25 BTC payouts were given out as prizes — which obviously reads completely insane in hindsight

There are also examples where payouts were made in other cryptocurrencies (not Bitcoin specifically), like made-for-TV golf events tied to a crypto sponsor paying in the sponsor’s token. Different vibe, but it still shows the same direction of travel: digital assets creeping into prize distribution.

Starcraft player jumperPro gamer “Jumper” was one of the players to receive 25 btc ($40 at the time) for finishing in the quarter finals.

Will Other Sports Follow Properly (Not Just Sponsorship Logos)?

I think two things decide it:

First: friction
If a payout method is annoying, slow, or creates paperwork nightmares, organisers won’t bother. Bitcoin (or crypto rails in general) can be fast and borderless, but only if the event has a smooth process for winners.

Second: legitimacy
Events that want to attract serious entrants need to feel professional. That’s why this marlin tournament leaning hard on rules, verification, and structure matters. If organisers can make “BTC payout” feel normal and compliant, it becomes easier for other sports to copy.

Esports feels like the obvious next “full send” category. The audience is digital-native and tournaments already deal with international players constantly. But I wouldn’t rule out niche endurance events, online-to-offline hybrid comps, or even smaller pro circuits experimenting with it first.

Final Thoughts

I went from “lol Big Bass” to “hang on… this is a sign of the times” in about five minutes.

A global marlin competition paying out in Bitcoin isn’t just a quirky headline. It’s another marker that Bitcoin has crossed the line from internet money to something people will genuinely accept as a serious prize.

And once enough organisers realise that “paid in BTC” can be a feature rather than a gimmick, it’s not hard to imagine other competitions taking note and following suit.

And if, like me, you’re more comfortable catching digital fish than wrestling a 1,000-pound marlin out at sea, you can always stick to the reels.

Plenty of crypto casinos feature Pragmatic’s Big Bass variants, where the only thing you’re battling is variance. Different ocean, same dream — land something big and walk away smiling.

For full details of the event, be sure to check out Bitcoin Marlin World.

The post From Big Bass to Big Bitcoin: A Marlin Tournament Paying in BTC appeared first on BitcoinChaser.

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$69,070.27
$69,070.27$69,070.27
+0.53%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Solid growth outlook supports Ringgit – Standard Chartered

Solid growth outlook supports Ringgit – Standard Chartered

The post Solid growth outlook supports Ringgit – Standard Chartered appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Standard Chartered’s Edward Lee and Jonathan Koh highlight
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/14 03:14
IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge!

IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge!

The post IP Hits $11.75, HYPE Climbs to $55, BlockDAG Surpasses Both with $407M Presale Surge! appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto News 17 September 2025 | 18:00 Discover why BlockDAG’s upcoming Awakening Testnet launch makes it the best crypto to buy today as Story (IP) price jumps to $11.75 and Hyperliquid hits new highs. Recent crypto market numbers show strength but also some limits. The Story (IP) price jump has been sharp, fueled by big buybacks and speculation, yet critics point out that revenue still lags far behind its valuation. The Hyperliquid (HYPE) price looks solid around the mid-$50s after a new all-time high, but questions remain about sustainability once the hype around USDH proposals cools down. So the obvious question is: why chase coins that are either stretched thin or at risk of retracing when you could back a network that’s already proving itself on the ground? That’s where BlockDAG comes in. While other chains are stuck dealing with validator congestion or outages, BlockDAG’s upcoming Awakening Testnet will be stress-testing its EVM-compatible smart chain with real miners before listing. For anyone looking for the best crypto coin to buy, the choice between waiting on fixes or joining live progress feels like an easy one. BlockDAG: Smart Chain Running Before Launch Ethereum continues to wrestle with gas congestion, and Solana is still known for network freezes, yet BlockDAG is already showing a different picture. Its upcoming Awakening Testnet, set to launch on September 25, isn’t just a demo; it’s a live rollout where the chain’s base protocols are being stress-tested with miners connected globally. EVM compatibility is active, account abstraction is built in, and tools like updated vesting contracts and Stratum integration are already functional. Instead of waiting for fixes like other networks, BlockDAG is proving its infrastructure in real time. What makes this even more important is that the technology is operational before the coin even hits exchanges. That…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:32
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00