MANTRA Chain’s native token OM has emerged as one of today’s strongest performers, posting a 35% gain across major currency pairs in the past 24 hours. Trading at $0.0623 as of February 13, 2026, the token has captured $128.3 million in daily volume—nearly double its $74.1 million market capitalization, suggesting aggressive positioning by traders anticipating further momentum.
What makes this price action particularly noteworthy is the context: while Bitcoin gained just 0.92% in the same period, OM substantially outperformed the broader market with gains exceeding 36.7% against BTC. This divergence signals specific catalysts driving interest in MANTRA’s RWA (Real World Assets) blockchain infrastructure rather than general market sentiment.
MANTRA Chain positions itself as the world’s first RWA Layer-1 blockchain with MultiVM support, fully compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine. This technical architecture addresses a critical gap we’ve observed in the blockchain ecosystem: the friction between decentralized permissionless networks and the compliance requirements of institutional capital.
By enabling developers and institutions to embed compliance at either the chain level or smart contract level, MANTRA offers what they describe as a “Permissionless Blockchain for Permissioned Applications.” This design philosophy becomes increasingly relevant as traditional financial institutions explore blockchain integration without abandoning regulatory frameworks.
Our analysis of on-chain metrics reveals that OM’s trading volume-to-market-cap ratio of 1.73x indicates highly speculative positioning. For context, established Layer-1 protocols typically maintain ratios between 0.1x and 0.3x during normal market conditions. This elevated ratio suggests either: (1) significant new capital entering positions, (2) heavy rotation from existing holders, or (3) leveraged trading activity amplifying volume.
The $128 million in 24-hour trading volume presents several analytical angles worth examining. At a market cap of just $74 million, this volume concentration typically indicates one of three scenarios: exchange listing announcements, partnership reveals, or algorithmic momentum trading.
We observe that OM’s price appreciation was remarkably consistent across currency pairs. The token gained 34.99% against USD, 35.13% against EUR, 36.29% against AUD, and 35.96% against NZD. This geographical distribution of gains—spanning American, European, and Asia-Pacific markets—suggests coordinated global interest rather than region-specific catalysts.
Particularly interesting is OM’s 37.17% gain against SOL and 38.23% against XRP. These outperformances against major Layer-1 competitors indicate capital rotation specifically into RWA-narrative tokens, possibly driven by institutional inquiries about compliant blockchain infrastructure for tokenized securities.
MANTRA’s positioning in the Real World Assets sector places it at the convergence of two major 2026 trends: institutional blockchain adoption and regulatory clarity around digital securities. The RWA sector encompasses tokenized real estate, commodities, bonds, and other traditionally illiquid assets brought on-chain.
We estimate the addressable market for RWA tokenization exceeded $2 trillion in early 2026, yet blockchain infrastructure specifically designed for compliant RWA applications remains limited. MANTRA’s MultiVM support and compliance-first architecture address technical pain points we’ve documented in institutional blockchain pilot programs.
However, investors should note that OM ranks #338 by market capitalization, indicating significant speculative risk. The token’s relatively small market cap means price discovery remains volatile and susceptible to whale manipulation or coordinated trading activity.
From a technical perspective, OM’s price action exhibits characteristics of early-stage momentum rather than established trend confirmation. The token trades at 0.000000930 BTC, and the 36.7% gain against Bitcoin suggests traders view OM as a high-beta play on the RWA narrative.
Several risk factors warrant consideration: First, the extreme volume-to-market-cap ratio could indicate unsustainable positioning that may reverse quickly. Second, MANTRA’s market cap rank of #338 means liquidity constraints could amplify volatility in both directions. Third, the RWA sector faces regulatory uncertainty despite recent clarity improvements.
We also note that MANTRA Chain launched its mainnet relatively recently in the broader context of Layer-1 development cycles. Network effects, developer adoption, and institutional integration typically require 18-24 months to materialize meaningfully. Current price action may anticipate rather than reflect these fundamentals.
MANTRA competes in an increasingly crowded RWA infrastructure space. Polymesh, for instance, focuses specifically on security token requirements with built-in compliance. Provenance Blockchain targets financial services with institutional validators. Avalanche’s subnet architecture enables customized compliance configurations.
What differentiates MANTRA is the combination of EVM compatibility with chain-level compliance embedding. This design allows Ethereum developers to migrate applications while adding regulatory frameworks—a potentially significant advantage given Ethereum’s dominant developer mindshare.
Yet we must acknowledge that EVM compatibility alone hasn’t guaranteed success for previous Layer-1 projects. Fantom, Harmony, and Aurora offered similar technical specifications but struggled to capture sustained developer and user attention. MANTRA’s success depends on converting technical capability into institutional partnerships and meaningful TVL growth.
For traders considering OM exposure, several principles apply: First, the current volume spike suggests momentum trading rather than fundamental revaluation—approach with appropriate position sizing. Second, monitoring institutional announcement channels becomes critical given MANTRA’s B2B focus. Third, correlation analysis with other RWA tokens (ONDO, POLYX, RIO) can provide early signals of sector rotation.
For institutions evaluating RWA infrastructure, MANTRA’s architecture deserves technical due diligence. The ability to customize compliance at the smart contract level addresses specific pain points in securities tokenization. However, production-ready institutional infrastructure requires extensive security auditing and regulatory consultation beyond initial technical assessment.
Long-term holders should recognize that OM remains a speculative asset in an emerging category. While the RWA narrative has fundamental merit, individual protocol success depends on execution, partnerships, and network effects that develop over quarters and years rather than days. Current price appreciation reflects anticipation of these outcomes rather than their realization.
As we track MANTRA’s development through 2026, key metrics include: TVL growth trajectory, institutional partnership announcements, developer activity on GitHub, and regulatory clarity in key jurisdictions. These fundamentals will ultimately determine whether today’s price action marks the beginning of sustained growth or temporary speculative enthusiasm.



BitGo’s move creates further competition in a burgeoning European crypto market that is expected to generate $26 billion revenue this year, according to one estimate. BitGo, a digital asset infrastructure company with more than $100 billion in assets under custody, has received an extension of its license from Germany’s Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), enabling it to offer crypto services to European investors. The company said its local subsidiary, BitGo Europe, can now provide custody, staking, transfer, and trading services. Institutional clients will also have access to an over-the-counter (OTC) trading desk and multiple liquidity venues.The extension builds on BitGo’s previous Markets-in-Crypto-Assets (MiCA) license, also issued by BaFIN, and adds trading to the existing custody, transfer and staking services. BitGo acquired its initial MiCA license in May 2025, which allowed it to offer certain services to traditional institutions and crypto native companies in the European Union.Read more