Hecto Finance defends tokenized private shares following OpenAI backlash

Ultan Miller, CEO of Hecto Finance, laid out a bold vision during an interview with CoinDesk at Consensus Hong Kong 2026: a blockchain-native bridge to the world’s most valuable private companies, long out of reach for everyday investors.

However, his strategy and the controversy it sparks, highlight how the tokenization of private equity is evolving faster than legal frameworks and corporate consensus.

Hecto bills itself as building “the world’s first tokenized pre-IPO company index,” designed to give public investors exposure to firms that traditionally stayed behind closed doors until going public. Miller said the index is being developed on the Canton Network, an institutional blockchain designed to support privacy, compliance and programmable settlement, features he claims are essential for bringing traditional securities onto blockchain rails at scale.

Edwin Mata, CEO and co-founder of tokenization platform Brickken, offered a sharply contrasting tone at the same conference. Mata, who also participated in CoinDesk’s PitchFest competition, warned that tokenizing company shares without issuer knowledge or consent risks undermining both investor protection and market credibility.

Now that tokenization of real-world assets is forecasted to become a $30 trillion industry by 2030, Mata said, too many inexperienced players are entering the space in pursuit of quick profits.

“This is a recipe for chaos, low-quality projects, and massive losses for investors lured into ventures with no solid foundations, especially lacking real know-how in securities structuring, issuance mechanics, and corporate law,” Mata warned.

Robinhood backlash highlights the tension

Skepticism around tokenized private equity isn’t theoretical. In June 2025, Robinhood announced it would offer tokenized equities in Europe and launched a limited giveaway of equity-linked tokens tied to OpenAI and SpaceX.

OpenAI responded publicly.

“These ‘OpenAI tokens’ are not OpenAI equity,” the company said. “We did not partner with Robinhood, were not involved in this, and do not endorse it. Any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval — we did not approve any transfer. Please be careful.”

The episode brought to life the core issue confronting the sector: when third parties create blockchain-based instruments referencing private companies, what exactly are investors buying and who has authorized it?

Miller: ‘A grey area’ for now

Miller, who, prior to Hecto, founded one of the first digital asset investment banks regulated by the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), said he and his co-founders, including former executives from Goldman Sachs and Barclays, acknowledge the tension but maintain their structure is different. He described the space as operating in a “grey area,” and said incentives could align over time as regulation matures and market demand crystallizes.

Rather than see tokenization as a legal workaround, Miller portrayed it as part of an inevitable transition of traditional securities onto programmable rails. He argued that as companies remain private longer and valuations grow in secondary markets, demand for broader access will continue to build.

Hecto’s social channels also indicate active ecosystem growth and community engagement, positioning the product as more than a theoretical construct but a live endeavor networking with institutional custody solutions and on-chain governance mechanisms.

The pre-IPO Index: Hectocorns and institutional rails

Miller frames Hecto’s inaugural product around a collection of elite private companies or as he called them, “Hectocorns” with valuations north of $100 billion, including SpaceX, OpenAI, ByteDance, xAI, Stripe, Tether and Anthropic.

The idea is to wrap exposure to this basket into a single on-chain token, enabling investors to gain diversified access via a programmable instrument rather than individual share purchases.

The Hecto CEO explained that the token functions by having investors deposit capital into a vault, after which the protocol issues tokens representing proportional exposure to the basket’s aggregate performance.

The index is rules-based and dynamic: if a company exits via IPO or liquidity event, proceeds are directed into a liquidity pool used to buy back tokens, potentially benefiting remaining holders. Governance token holders also vote on future index composition.

Miller’s broader thesis is structural. He argues public markets no longer define an era; instead, massive private companies create value long before traditional IPOs. Tokenization, in his telling, is the missing link between private enterprise growth and broader investor access.

The regulatory and legal divide

Yet even as Miller promotes the mechanics, the legal foundations remain unsettled.

Mata emphasized that equity tokenization does not alter the legal nature of shares. It is a technological overlay on traditional shareholding, governed by corporate law and documentation, rather than something that derives legitimacy from blockchain itself.

If the issuer consents and securities regulations are followed, tokenization can modernize recordkeeping and transfer processes, he added. If not, it risks misrepresenting rights and exposing investors to governance uncertainty.

Mata also stressed that tokenization does not automatically create liquidity. Real liquidity requires compliant secondary markets, credible settlement infrastructure, investor demand, and regulatory clarity — elements that are still developing across jurisdictions.

Ambiguity around voting rights, dividend entitlements and transferability, he said, introduces both legal and reputational risk.

Market implications and investor access

If Hecto’s index gains traction, it could represent a meaningful shift in how private-market exposure is distributed by embedding high-growth private-company exposure into programmable blockchain instruments.

However, without issuer cooperation, clear securities compliance and functioning secondary markets, the promise of tokenized private equity could remain restricted by the same structural issues it seeks to transform.

At Consensus Hong Kong 2026, one thing became clear: tokenization of private equity is no longer an experiment but an emerging asset with inherent challenges.