The post Why Buy Real Estate? Bitcoin Mining Delivers 70% Better Returns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Bitcoin mining requires less expertise, lower maintenance, and generates ~70% higher returns. Real estate generates a passive income, but you need ~$1-2 million to generate ~$100K per year. Simply Mining explains why Bitcoin mining is a superior investment to real estate in today’s digital economy. The typical playbook for generating passive income is to invest in real estate. The story is familiar: buy a house, rent it out, sit back, and let the cash flow in. But that story is incomplete. It leaves out the part where the roof leaks, the boiler bursts, and the tenant gets behind on the rent. Relax, according to Simply Mining, there is a better way: Bitcoin mining can help you avoid these headaches and generate returns around 70% higher. Bitcoin Mining: Breaking Down the Numbers Simply Mining is a Bitcoin mining company based in Cedar Falls, Iowa, and it brings the comparison of real estate and Bitcoin mining investing into sharp focus in a recent post. The biggest question most investors have is, “How much capital is needed to generate $100,000 in annual passive income?” For real estate, it means tying up as much as $1–2 million in property, and factoring in a host of ongoing costs. For Bitcoin mining using a professionally managed institutional-grade setup, the investment needed for that level of cash flow is under $350,000 (under current market conditions). Simply Mining breaks down a hypothetical $350,000 investment in both asset classes. Real Estate $350,000 property purchase $2,500/month rental income ($30,000/year) ~$7,000 annual maintenance costs Net annual income: $23,000 (6.5% yield) This doesn’t even include property taxes, insurance, or major maintenance. Bitcoin Mining $350,000 buys 32 S21+ hydro miners ($11,000/each) Mined: ~0.185 BTC/month (current conditions) Electricity/maintenance: $10,915/month ($130,980/year at $0.08/kWh) Net annual income: $113,000 (32% yield) Even accounting for machine… The post Why Buy Real Estate? Bitcoin Mining Delivers 70% Better Returns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways Bitcoin mining requires less expertise, lower maintenance, and generates ~70% higher returns. Real estate generates a passive income, but you need ~$1-2 million to generate ~$100K per year. Simply Mining explains why Bitcoin mining is a superior investment to real estate in today’s digital economy. The typical playbook for generating passive income is to invest in real estate. The story is familiar: buy a house, rent it out, sit back, and let the cash flow in. But that story is incomplete. It leaves out the part where the roof leaks, the boiler bursts, and the tenant gets behind on the rent. Relax, according to Simply Mining, there is a better way: Bitcoin mining can help you avoid these headaches and generate returns around 70% higher. Bitcoin Mining: Breaking Down the Numbers Simply Mining is a Bitcoin mining company based in Cedar Falls, Iowa, and it brings the comparison of real estate and Bitcoin mining investing into sharp focus in a recent post. The biggest question most investors have is, “How much capital is needed to generate $100,000 in annual passive income?” For real estate, it means tying up as much as $1–2 million in property, and factoring in a host of ongoing costs. For Bitcoin mining using a professionally managed institutional-grade setup, the investment needed for that level of cash flow is under $350,000 (under current market conditions). Simply Mining breaks down a hypothetical $350,000 investment in both asset classes. Real Estate $350,000 property purchase $2,500/month rental income ($30,000/year) ~$7,000 annual maintenance costs Net annual income: $23,000 (6.5% yield) This doesn’t even include property taxes, insurance, or major maintenance. Bitcoin Mining $350,000 buys 32 S21+ hydro miners ($11,000/each) Mined: ~0.185 BTC/month (current conditions) Electricity/maintenance: $10,915/month ($130,980/year at $0.08/kWh) Net annual income: $113,000 (32% yield) Even accounting for machine…

Why Buy Real Estate? Bitcoin Mining Delivers 70% Better Returns

Key Takeaways

  • Bitcoin mining requires less expertise, lower maintenance, and generates ~70% higher returns.
  • Real estate generates a passive income, but you need ~$1-2 million to generate ~$100K per year.
  • Simply Mining explains why Bitcoin mining is a superior investment to real estate in today’s digital economy.

The typical playbook for generating passive income is to invest in real estate. The story is familiar: buy a house, rent it out, sit back, and let the cash flow in. But that story is incomplete. It leaves out the part where the roof leaks, the boiler bursts, and the tenant gets behind on the rent. Relax, according to Simply Mining, there is a better way: Bitcoin mining can help you avoid these headaches and generate returns around 70% higher.

Bitcoin Mining: Breaking Down the Numbers

Simply Mining is a Bitcoin mining company based in Cedar Falls, Iowa, and it brings the comparison of real estate and Bitcoin mining investing into sharp focus in a recent post.

The biggest question most investors have is, “How much capital is needed to generate $100,000 in annual passive income?” For real estate, it means tying up as much as $1–2 million in property, and factoring in a host of ongoing costs.

For Bitcoin mining using a professionally managed institutional-grade setup, the investment needed for that level of cash flow is under $350,000 (under current market conditions). Simply Mining breaks down a hypothetical $350,000 investment in both asset classes.

Real Estate

  • $350,000 property purchase
  • $2,500/month rental income ($30,000/year)
  • ~$7,000 annual maintenance costs
  • Net annual income: $23,000 (6.5% yield)

This doesn’t even include property taxes, insurance, or major maintenance.

Bitcoin Mining

  • $350,000 buys 32 S21+ hydro miners ($11,000/each)
  • Mined: ~0.185 BTC/month (current conditions)
  • Electricity/maintenance: $10,915/month ($130,980/year at $0.08/kWh)
  • Net annual income: $113,000 (32% yield)

Even accounting for machine depreciation of 33% per year, Bitcoin mining still outshines property. Over three years, after 70% equipment value decay, the setup still nets approximately $185,000.

Real-World Volatility and Depreciation

Of course, critics argue that real estate appreciates over time, while Bitcoin mining equipment becomes worthless, and they have a valid point; except that the pace of Bitcoin’s adoption and price gains more than offsets hardware decline.

Over the past 10 years, Bitcoin has averaged around 60% annual growth, compared to single-digit returns for real estate. Even in the last five years, Bitcoin is up around 875%, while real estate peaked at around 50%.

Moreover, Bitcoin mining payouts rise as the BTC price increases. In Simply Mining’s hypothetical scenario, mining profits could increase from $113,000 in year one to $176,000 by year three (assuming continued BTC appreciation and rising mining difficulty).

And while the dollar price of homes in many markets is stagnant or in decline, the reality is even grimmer when measured against Bitcoin. A house that might have incre

hased by 20-50% in fiat terms over the past five years actually lost massive value when denominated in BTC: in some markets, to the tune of a 90% drop in Bitcoin terms over a decade.

Generational preferences are also shifting fast. Surveys show that Zoomers and Millennials now prefer crypto and stocks to real estate. Only 13% of Zoomers have real estate holdings, while the rest are putting their capital to work in Bitcoin, ETFs, and digital assets.

Tangible Hassle vs. Digital Simplicity

Bitcoin mining requires “less expertise” than buying and managing a property. There are no agents, escrow, or property inspections, no leaks, roof repairs, or angry tenants, and no property taxes or insurance premiums.

Bitcoin mining offers full liquidity: miners can be spun up or sold faster than property (sometimes in a day), and there are daily payments, often in BTC, a scarce, non-inflationary money that appreciates over time.

Real estate is slow, illiquid, and comes bundled with ongoing headaches, and its returns diminish compared to Bitcoin mining in the current era.

Of course, not all investors are brave enough to stomach Bitcoin’s volatility. For as much as the long-term trajectory of Bitcoin may be NGU, short and mid-term headwinds, price corrections, and drawdowns are not everyone’s cup of tea.

Bitcoin mining, when managed well, can deliver double or triple the yield of a rental property, but you can’t live in your ASIC in times of crisis, and as Simply Mining emphasizes:

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/08/27/why-buy-real-estate-bitcoin-mining-delivers-70-better-returns/

Market Opportunity
Threshold Logo
Threshold Price(T)
$0.007154
$0.007154$0.007154
+1.14%
USD
Threshold (T) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00