The post 🛎️ Binance is not committed to compliance or users appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Binance has been thrust back into the spotlight as people onceThe post 🛎️ Binance is not committed to compliance or users appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Binance has been thrust back into the spotlight as people once

🛎️ Binance is not committed to compliance or users

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Binance has been thrust back into the spotlight as people once again analyze its role in facilitating transactions to Iranian entities.

In response, Richard Teng, Binance’s co-chief executive, and Noah Perlman, the company’s chief compliance officer, called the criticisms unfair and unfounded.

They also claimed that for Binance, compliance is foundational and an “unbreakable promise to users.”

They claim that to help them deliver on this promise, they have a team of more than 1,500 experts working to protect those users. If each of those experts works 40 hours per week, then every week Binance is apparently investing 30 man-years of effort.

This promise is also echoed in other places, like the page on its support website entitled, ‘How to Get Your Coin Listed on Binance.com,’ which claims that “token listing on Binance goes through rigorous due diligence.”

This is also not a one-time due diligence; a separate page entitled “The Ultimate Guide to Staying Listed on Binance” claims that “a specialized Binance team continuously and rigorously evaluates the token on our platform to ensure that they remain in line with the standards that our users expect.”

TUSD up to 99.7% backed by speculative assets despite SEC settlement

I don’t believe that Binance has done even a passable job of ensuring that tokens on the platform are up to the standards that users expect.

Consider TrueUSD, a token that Binance still has listed. This stablecoin’s reserves are almost entirely inaccessible, trapped in speculative funds that will not redeem according to the SEC and lawsuits against the trust company that was supposed to hold them.

These problems are echoed in the attestations for this self-proclaimed stablecoin. These make clear that “The Hong Kong depository institution has invested all or substantially all of the collateral in other instruments to generate yield, which cannot be readily convertible to cash, and are subject to ongoing legal proceedings.”

They continue, “Techteryx has as of 25 September 2020, learned of a final judgement and settlement of a complaint brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States against the prior operators of the TrueUSD business… Techteryx has instituted proceedings against the Hong Kong Depository Institution.”

Justin Sun bailed out $500M stablecoin TUSD, report

Whatever ability this token has to redeem for users is dependent on credit extended to it from Justin Sun, who still pretends that he doesn’t own it.

Despite these problems, Binance still claims on its website that TrueUSD “is reportedly collateralized by USD held in escrow in bank accounts owned by trust companies.”

This page further falsely attributes the functioning of this token to TrustToken, which isn’t the firm that operates the token; the token is operated by Techteryx.

The legal battles of Justin Sun

Does that seem like a token that’s “in line with the standards that Binance “users expect”? Is it consistent with the efforts of “a specialized Binance team” of experts that “continuously and rigorously evaluates the token on our platform”?

I will contend that this isn’t consistent with those claims and that this illustrates the willingness of the Binance team to ignore certain compliance failures and that, despite the huge number of experts, it is failing to perform adequate due diligence on tokens it continues to list.

If Binance is willing to misrepresent Sun-affiliated stablecoins, then what else is it willing to misrepresent?

— Bennett Tomlin

Source: https://protos.com/the-context-162-binance-is-not-committed-to-compliance-or-users/

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0003504
$0.0003504$0.0003504
-1.68%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump Brothers’ American Bitcoin Hits BTC Milestone as Stock Falls to Lowest Price Since IPO

Trump Brothers’ American Bitcoin Hits BTC Milestone as Stock Falls to Lowest Price Since IPO

The post Trump Brothers’ American Bitcoin Hits BTC Milestone as Stock Falls to Lowest Price Since IPO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief American Bitcoin
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/31 01:01
What the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) Means for ETH’s Future

What the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) Means for ETH’s Future

The Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) is a new framework backed by the Ethereum Foundation, Gnosis, and Zisk that aims to address one of Ethereum’s biggest structural
Share
Ethnews2026/03/31 01:12
USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

A heated contest for control over a new dollar-pegged token has set the stage for what analysts say could define the next phase of the stablecoin industry. According to Bloomberg, a bidding war unfolded on Hyperliquid, one of crypto’s fastest-growing trading platforms, with the prize being the right to issue USDH, its native stablecoin. The competition drew some of the sector’s most prominent names, including Paxos, Sky, and Ethena, who later withdrew their bid, alongside the lesser-known Native Markets, a startup backed by Stripe stablecoin subsidiary Bridge. Hyperliquid Stablecoin Race Shows Branding and Partnerships Matter as Much as Tech Over the weekend, Hyperliquid’s validators, the contributors who secure the network and vote on key decisions, awarded the USDH contract to Native Markets over the weekend. Despite its relatively new status, the firm’s connection with Stripe helped it outpace more established rivals. Stablecoins underpin decentralized finance by providing a dollar-backed medium for collateral, settlement, and payments across applications. What began as a grassroots, community-led sector has evolved into a battleground for institutions and payment companies seeking revenue from interest on reserves. Circle, for example, shares proceeds from its USDC with Coinbase under a partnership designed to stabilize earnings during market swings. The Hyperliquid contest offered a rare glimpse into just how intense competition has become. Paxos pledged to take no revenue until USDH surpassed $1 billion in circulation. Agora offered to share 100% of net revenue with Hyperliquid, while Ethena put forward 95%. All were outbid by Native Markets, whose ties to Stripe’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and subsequent rollout of the Tempo blockchain positioned it as a strong contender. “Every stablecoin issuer is extremely desperate for supply,” said Zaheer Ebtikar, co-founder of Split Capital. “They are willing to publicly announce how much they are willing to offer. It just shows it’s a very tough business for stablecoin issuers.” While USDC remains dominant on Hyperliquid with more than $5.6 billion in deposits, the arrival of USDH could shift flows and revenue dynamics. Paxos co-founder Bhau Kotecha said the firm sees the exchange’s growth as an important opportunity, while Agora’s co-founder Nick van Eck warned that awarding the contract to a vertically integrated issuer risked undermining decentralization. Regulatory positioning also factored into the debate. Paxos operates under a New York trust charter and is seeking a federal license, while Bridge holds money transmitter approvals in 30 states. Native Markets, in a blog post, cited regulatory flexibility and deployment speed as reasons for its selection. Hyperliquid said the strong engagement from its community validated the process. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissed concerns over USDC’s status, noting on X that competition benefits the ecosystem. Analysts suggested that fears of centralization may be exaggerated, noting that Hyperliquid is likely to remain neutral and support multiple stablecoins. Still, the contest over USDH highlighted a new reality for stablecoins: branding, partnerships, and business strategy are becoming as decisive as technology. Native Markets Secures USDH Stablecoin Mandate on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid has concluded its governance vote for the USDH stablecoin, awarding the mandate to Native Markets after a closely watched process that drew weeks of community debate and rival proposals. USDH, described by Hyperliquid as a “Hyperliquid-first, compliant, and natively minted” dollar-backed token, is intended to reduce the platform’s dependence on USDC and strengthen its spot markets. Validators on the decentralized exchange voted in favor of Native Markets, a relatively new player backed by Stripe’s Bridge subsidiary, over established contenders including Paxos and Ethena. The outcome followed a string of proposals offering aggressive revenue-sharing terms to win validator support, underscoring the scale of incentives attached to controlling USDH. Hyperliquid’s exchange has become a critical hub for stablecoin liquidity, with $5.7 billion in USDC, around 8% of its total supply, currently held on the network. At prevailing treasury yields, that translates to an estimated $200 million to $220 million in annual revenue for Circle, underlining why a native alternative could be transformative. Hyperliquid’s validators, who secure the network and vote on key decisions, selected Native Markets following an on-chain governance process that concluded September 15. Native Markets has laid out a phased rollout for USDH, beginning with capped minting and redemption trials before expanding into spot markets. Its reserves will be managed in cash and treasuries by BlackRock, with on-chain tokenization through Superstate and Bridge. Yield from those reserves will be split between Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund and ecosystem development. The launch of USDH comes as Hyperliquid records record profits from perpetual futures trading, with $106 million in revenue in August alone, and prepares to slash spot trading fees by 80% to bolster liquidity. Analysts say the move positions Hyperliquid to capture more of the stablecoin economics internally, marking a significant step in its bid to rival the largest players in decentralized finance
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:48