In dismissing the case, the Sandiganbayan rules that the long delay violated the remaining defendants' right to a speedy trialIn dismissing the case, the Sandiganbayan rules that the long delay violated the remaining defendants' right to a speedy trial

1987 coco levy case that involved Marcoses dismissed over gov’t delay

2026/03/19 11:00
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

MANILA, Philippines – The anti-graft court on Tuesday, March 17, dismissed a 1987 coconut levy case that originally involved as defendants the late dictator Ferdinand E. Marcos, former first lady Imelda Marcos, and the late businessman Eduardo Cojuangco Jr., citing the government’s failure to actively pursue the case.

Other original defendants included the late senator Juan Ponce Enrile, the late former Zamboanga City mayor Maria Clara Lobregat, Enrique M. Cojuangco, Marcos O. Cojuangco, Rafael Abello, and Eduardo’s firm, Agricultural Investors Incorporated (AII). Enrile and Lobregat were named because they served on the board of the state-owned United Coconut Planters Bank (UCPB).

The Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) had accused the defendants of conspiring to defraud the government of P426 million invested by AII in a 1974 project to produce hybrid coconut seedlings on Bugsuk Island, Palawan.

The 2nd Division of the Sandiganbayan dismissed the case against the remaining defendants – Enrique Cojuangco, Marcos O. Cojuangco, Abello, and AII. It stated that the long delay violated the their right to a speedy trial.

The court said Civil Case No. 0033-C, one of eight cases derived from the original complaint, had dragged on for more than 30 years, including a third amendment.

“Such a period is unreasonably excessive by any standard,” read part of the court’s ruling.

The Sandiganbayan also noted that the government “failed to prosecute this case within a reasonable timeframe” as lawyers repeatedly filed motions for extension.

“While the court recognizes the complexity of the issues and the voluminous records in this case, these factors do not sufficiently justify the 30-year long delay which prejudiced the defendants. During this period, the defendants have been put under a cloud of anxiety, suspicion, and often, hostility as the case loomed over them,” the court stated.

What was the case about?

The Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) had accused the defendants of conspiracy to defraud the government of P426 million, which AII invested in the 1974 project to grow hybrid coconut seedlings on Bugsuk Island, Palawan.

The money came from coconut farmers’ contributions to the Coconut Industry Development Fund (CIDF). The fund, part of the coconut levy, was first managed by the National Investment Development Corporation (NIDC) until 1978, when it was transferred to the UCPB.

UCPB officials were accused of not contesting P532.4 million in liquidated damages against the CIDF. On September 14, 1980, the bank reserved P750 million to cover any damages AII might face from the project. The project ended when former president Marcos terminated the coconut levy on August 27, 1982. UCPB then ended its agreement with AII, prompting the company to go to arbitration.

Prosecutors said the case went to a board of arbitrators with lawyers Esteban Bautista for AII, Aniceto Dideles for UCPB, and UP Law Professor Bartolome Carale as chairman. The PCGG questioned this because Eduardo Cojuangco “was president and chairman of AII while also serving as president and CEO of UCPB.”

On March 29, 1983, the board awarded P532.39 million to AII as “liquidated damages” and forfeited P426.26 million already given by NIDC. UCPB was also charged P150,000 for arbitration. 

A regional court in Makati subsequently upheld the ruling, which PCGG said the bank allowed to lapse without appeal. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
COCO BSC Logo
COCO BSC Price(COCO)
$0.22818
$0.22818$0.22818
0.00%
USD
COCO BSC (COCO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

A heated contest for control over a new dollar-pegged token has set the stage for what analysts say could define the next phase of the stablecoin industry. According to Bloomberg, a bidding war unfolded on Hyperliquid, one of crypto’s fastest-growing trading platforms, with the prize being the right to issue USDH, its native stablecoin. The competition drew some of the sector’s most prominent names, including Paxos, Sky, and Ethena, who later withdrew their bid, alongside the lesser-known Native Markets, a startup backed by Stripe stablecoin subsidiary Bridge. Hyperliquid Stablecoin Race Shows Branding and Partnerships Matter as Much as Tech Over the weekend, Hyperliquid’s validators, the contributors who secure the network and vote on key decisions, awarded the USDH contract to Native Markets over the weekend. Despite its relatively new status, the firm’s connection with Stripe helped it outpace more established rivals. Stablecoins underpin decentralized finance by providing a dollar-backed medium for collateral, settlement, and payments across applications. What began as a grassroots, community-led sector has evolved into a battleground for institutions and payment companies seeking revenue from interest on reserves. Circle, for example, shares proceeds from its USDC with Coinbase under a partnership designed to stabilize earnings during market swings. The Hyperliquid contest offered a rare glimpse into just how intense competition has become. Paxos pledged to take no revenue until USDH surpassed $1 billion in circulation. Agora offered to share 100% of net revenue with Hyperliquid, while Ethena put forward 95%. All were outbid by Native Markets, whose ties to Stripe’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and subsequent rollout of the Tempo blockchain positioned it as a strong contender. “Every stablecoin issuer is extremely desperate for supply,” said Zaheer Ebtikar, co-founder of Split Capital. “They are willing to publicly announce how much they are willing to offer. It just shows it’s a very tough business for stablecoin issuers.” While USDC remains dominant on Hyperliquid with more than $5.6 billion in deposits, the arrival of USDH could shift flows and revenue dynamics. Paxos co-founder Bhau Kotecha said the firm sees the exchange’s growth as an important opportunity, while Agora’s co-founder Nick van Eck warned that awarding the contract to a vertically integrated issuer risked undermining decentralization. Regulatory positioning also factored into the debate. Paxos operates under a New York trust charter and is seeking a federal license, while Bridge holds money transmitter approvals in 30 states. Native Markets, in a blog post, cited regulatory flexibility and deployment speed as reasons for its selection. Hyperliquid said the strong engagement from its community validated the process. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissed concerns over USDC’s status, noting on X that competition benefits the ecosystem. Analysts suggested that fears of centralization may be exaggerated, noting that Hyperliquid is likely to remain neutral and support multiple stablecoins. Still, the contest over USDH highlighted a new reality for stablecoins: branding, partnerships, and business strategy are becoming as decisive as technology. Native Markets Secures USDH Stablecoin Mandate on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid has concluded its governance vote for the USDH stablecoin, awarding the mandate to Native Markets after a closely watched process that drew weeks of community debate and rival proposals. USDH, described by Hyperliquid as a “Hyperliquid-first, compliant, and natively minted” dollar-backed token, is intended to reduce the platform’s dependence on USDC and strengthen its spot markets. Validators on the decentralized exchange voted in favor of Native Markets, a relatively new player backed by Stripe’s Bridge subsidiary, over established contenders including Paxos and Ethena. The outcome followed a string of proposals offering aggressive revenue-sharing terms to win validator support, underscoring the scale of incentives attached to controlling USDH. Hyperliquid’s exchange has become a critical hub for stablecoin liquidity, with $5.7 billion in USDC, around 8% of its total supply, currently held on the network. At prevailing treasury yields, that translates to an estimated $200 million to $220 million in annual revenue for Circle, underlining why a native alternative could be transformative. Hyperliquid’s validators, who secure the network and vote on key decisions, selected Native Markets following an on-chain governance process that concluded September 15. Native Markets has laid out a phased rollout for USDH, beginning with capped minting and redemption trials before expanding into spot markets. Its reserves will be managed in cash and treasuries by BlackRock, with on-chain tokenization through Superstate and Bridge. Yield from those reserves will be split between Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund and ecosystem development. The launch of USDH comes as Hyperliquid records record profits from perpetual futures trading, with $106 million in revenue in August alone, and prepares to slash spot trading fees by 80% to bolster liquidity. Analysts say the move positions Hyperliquid to capture more of the stablecoin economics internally, marking a significant step in its bid to rival the largest players in decentralized finance
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:48
Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead?

Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead?

The post Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Recent data reveals heightened instability in the cryptocurrency
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/31 01:21
BTC fell below $67,000, down 0.94% on the day.

BTC fell below $67,000, down 0.94% on the day.

PANews reported on March 31 that, according to OKX market data, BTC has just fallen below $67,000 and is currently trading at $66,989.20 per coin, down 0.94% on
Share
PANews2026/03/31 01:22