THE Philippines and China discussed the possibility of joint gas development during recent bilateral talks, signaling a potential revival of energy cooperationTHE Philippines and China discussed the possibility of joint gas development during recent bilateral talks, signaling a potential revival of energy cooperation

PHL and China discuss possible joint gas project

2026/03/29 20:15
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

By Kaela Patricia B. Gabriel

THE Philippines and China discussed the possibility of joint gas development during recent bilateral talks, signaling a potential revival of energy cooperation as Manila confronts tighter fuel supplies.

Initial exchanges on oil and gas exploration took place during the 24th Foreign Ministry Consultation and the 11th Bilateral Consultation Mechanism on the South China Sea, the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said late on Saturday. The discussions were held alongside talks aimed at improving coordination between the two countries’ coast guards.

President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. last week said he is open to restarting talks on joint energy exploration with China as the Philippines grapples with a fuel squeeze linked to the war in the Middle East.

China has also signaled willingness to resume negotiations. Shortly after Mr. Marcos’ remarks, Beijing said it is open to renewing discussions on joint energy development in the South China Sea.

Energy cooperation between the two countries has stalled in recent years. In 2023, the Philippine Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional a tripartite agreement among the Philippines, China and Vietnam to conduct marine seismic surveys in the disputed area, complicating efforts at joint resource exploration.

The latest talks were led by Philippine Foreign Affairs Undersecretary Leo M. Herrera‑Lim and Chinese Vice-Foreign Minister Sun Weidong. The delegations discussed political and security issues as well as potential cooperation in trade, agriculture and the energy sector, the DFA said.

The Philippines also raised recent incidents in contested waters that have affected Filipino personnel and fishermen, while reiterating its position on sovereignty based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the 2016 arbitral ruling that voided China’s expansive claims.

“Both sides continued to make progress on practical measures that are consistent with Philippine law and policy to increase confidence in the maritime domain,” the DFA said.

Beyond energy, the two countries discussed steps to deepen people‑to‑people ties through expanded tourism access, including visa facilitation and the opening of additional direct flight routes.

In January, the Philippines began allowing Chinese nationals to enter visa‑free for up to 14 days for tourism and business purposes, provided entry is through the Ninoy Aquino International Airport or Mactan‑Cebu International Airport.

Any move toward joint energy development would likely face legal and political scrutiny at home, given constitutional limits on foreign participation in resource extraction and heightened tensions in the South China Sea.

CHINESE ADVANTAGE
The Philippines could benefit from China’s technical capacity in offshore drilling if the two sides proceed with a joint oil and gas exploration in disputed areas of the South China Sea, provided Manila secures a formal agreement that safeguards its sovereignty, political analysts said.

While joint exploration could unlock much-needed energy resources for the Philippines, analysts cautioned that China would likely retain an advantage in any partnership due to its economic and technological clout.

“The Philippines does not have the capability to explore and make good use of available natural resources,” Edmund S. Tayao, president of Political Economic Elemental Researchers and Strategists, said in a Facebook Messenger call. “It will really require a partnership with a more capable country like China.”

Mr. Tayao noted that even if the potential exploration sites are within areas claimed by the Philippines, Manila would remain the lesser partner in such a venture. He stressed that the structure of any agreement would be crucial, particularly in defining resource-sharing terms and explicitly protecting Philippine sovereign rights.

“If the agreement includes control, sovereignty or ownership of the area, then we are clearly at a disadvantage,” he said, adding that negotiations should focus strictly on joint development.

Beyond economic considerations, a joint oil and gas project could also help ease diplomatic tensions and support broader confidence-building measures in the region. Amr Solon S. Sison, a Far Eastern University political science instructor, said cooperation on energy development could advance long-stalled talks on a code of conduct in the South China Sea.

“The Philippines does not have an established infrastructure to fully harness the energy sources from deep sea drilling besides natural gas,” Mr. Sison said in a Messenger chat, noting that the country has only one oil refinery and limited capacity for offshore drilling beyond natural gas extraction.

Mr. Tayao said Mr. Marcos’ openness about joint exploration is consistent with the administration’s foreign policy stance of being “a friend to all and an enemy to no one.”

Mr. Sison, however, views the potential revival of talks as a pragmatic response to rising global energy prices amid the war in the Middle East.

Market Opportunity
PHILCOIN Logo
PHILCOIN Price(PHL)
$0.01869
$0.01869$0.01869
+1.19%
USD
PHILCOIN (PHL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

A heated contest for control over a new dollar-pegged token has set the stage for what analysts say could define the next phase of the stablecoin industry. According to Bloomberg, a bidding war unfolded on Hyperliquid, one of crypto’s fastest-growing trading platforms, with the prize being the right to issue USDH, its native stablecoin. The competition drew some of the sector’s most prominent names, including Paxos, Sky, and Ethena, who later withdrew their bid, alongside the lesser-known Native Markets, a startup backed by Stripe stablecoin subsidiary Bridge. Hyperliquid Stablecoin Race Shows Branding and Partnerships Matter as Much as Tech Over the weekend, Hyperliquid’s validators, the contributors who secure the network and vote on key decisions, awarded the USDH contract to Native Markets over the weekend. Despite its relatively new status, the firm’s connection with Stripe helped it outpace more established rivals. Stablecoins underpin decentralized finance by providing a dollar-backed medium for collateral, settlement, and payments across applications. What began as a grassroots, community-led sector has evolved into a battleground for institutions and payment companies seeking revenue from interest on reserves. Circle, for example, shares proceeds from its USDC with Coinbase under a partnership designed to stabilize earnings during market swings. The Hyperliquid contest offered a rare glimpse into just how intense competition has become. Paxos pledged to take no revenue until USDH surpassed $1 billion in circulation. Agora offered to share 100% of net revenue with Hyperliquid, while Ethena put forward 95%. All were outbid by Native Markets, whose ties to Stripe’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and subsequent rollout of the Tempo blockchain positioned it as a strong contender. “Every stablecoin issuer is extremely desperate for supply,” said Zaheer Ebtikar, co-founder of Split Capital. “They are willing to publicly announce how much they are willing to offer. It just shows it’s a very tough business for stablecoin issuers.” While USDC remains dominant on Hyperliquid with more than $5.6 billion in deposits, the arrival of USDH could shift flows and revenue dynamics. Paxos co-founder Bhau Kotecha said the firm sees the exchange’s growth as an important opportunity, while Agora’s co-founder Nick van Eck warned that awarding the contract to a vertically integrated issuer risked undermining decentralization. Regulatory positioning also factored into the debate. Paxos operates under a New York trust charter and is seeking a federal license, while Bridge holds money transmitter approvals in 30 states. Native Markets, in a blog post, cited regulatory flexibility and deployment speed as reasons for its selection. Hyperliquid said the strong engagement from its community validated the process. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissed concerns over USDC’s status, noting on X that competition benefits the ecosystem. Analysts suggested that fears of centralization may be exaggerated, noting that Hyperliquid is likely to remain neutral and support multiple stablecoins. Still, the contest over USDH highlighted a new reality for stablecoins: branding, partnerships, and business strategy are becoming as decisive as technology. Native Markets Secures USDH Stablecoin Mandate on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid has concluded its governance vote for the USDH stablecoin, awarding the mandate to Native Markets after a closely watched process that drew weeks of community debate and rival proposals. USDH, described by Hyperliquid as a “Hyperliquid-first, compliant, and natively minted” dollar-backed token, is intended to reduce the platform’s dependence on USDC and strengthen its spot markets. Validators on the decentralized exchange voted in favor of Native Markets, a relatively new player backed by Stripe’s Bridge subsidiary, over established contenders including Paxos and Ethena. The outcome followed a string of proposals offering aggressive revenue-sharing terms to win validator support, underscoring the scale of incentives attached to controlling USDH. Hyperliquid’s exchange has become a critical hub for stablecoin liquidity, with $5.7 billion in USDC, around 8% of its total supply, currently held on the network. At prevailing treasury yields, that translates to an estimated $200 million to $220 million in annual revenue for Circle, underlining why a native alternative could be transformative. Hyperliquid’s validators, who secure the network and vote on key decisions, selected Native Markets following an on-chain governance process that concluded September 15. Native Markets has laid out a phased rollout for USDH, beginning with capped minting and redemption trials before expanding into spot markets. Its reserves will be managed in cash and treasuries by BlackRock, with on-chain tokenization through Superstate and Bridge. Yield from those reserves will be split between Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund and ecosystem development. The launch of USDH comes as Hyperliquid records record profits from perpetual futures trading, with $106 million in revenue in August alone, and prepares to slash spot trading fees by 80% to bolster liquidity. Analysts say the move positions Hyperliquid to capture more of the stablecoin economics internally, marking a significant step in its bid to rival the largest players in decentralized finance
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:48
Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead?

Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead?

The post Bitcoin Market Faces Renewed Pressure: What Lies Ahead? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Recent data reveals heightened instability in the cryptocurrency
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/31 01:21
BTC fell below $67,000, down 0.94% on the day.

BTC fell below $67,000, down 0.94% on the day.

PANews reported on March 31 that, according to OKX market data, BTC has just fallen below $67,000 and is currently trading at $66,989.20 per coin, down 0.94% on
Share
PANews2026/03/31 01:22