Author: Kathy.xyz In February 2026, Logan Paul auctioned off a Pokémon card for $16.5 million. Only 41 of these "Pikachu Illustrator" cards exist worldwide, anAuthor: Kathy.xyz In February 2026, Logan Paul auctioned off a Pokémon card for $16.5 million. Only 41 of these "Pikachu Illustrator" cards exist worldwide, an

A Pokémon trading card sold for a record-breaking $16.5 million, a testament to the synergy between TCG and Web3.

2026/03/30 12:11
5 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Author: Kathy.xyz

In February 2026, Logan Paul auctioned off a Pokémon card for $16.5 million.

A Pokémon trading card sold for a record-breaking $16.5 million, a testament to the synergy between TCG and Web3.

Only 41 of these "Pikachu Illustrator" cards exist worldwide, and the one owned by Logan Paul is the only one to receive a perfect 10/10 score from the PSA. He bought it for $5.3 million in 2022, and four years later, its value more than tripled, making him a profit of over $11 million.

The things that kids used to save up their pocket money to buy back then have now become financial assets worth eight figures in US dollars.

Where did this business come from, and how big is it?

In 1993, mathematics PhD Richard Garfield combined the collecting mechanism of baseball cards with board game strategy to create Magic: The Gathering.

The logic is simple: random card packs → different rarity → generate exchange value → create demand for collecting → drive up the secondary market.

This underlying mechanism has remained unchanged for thirty years.

The current size of the three major brands:

  • Pokémon TCG sales are approximately $2 billion annually, with a cumulative total of over 75 billion copies sold.
  • Yu-Gi-Oh! followed closely behind, with approximately 1.99 billion yen;
  • Magic: The Gathering has approximately 1.08 billion players and over 50 million players worldwide.

These three brands alone are worth over $5 billion.

The sports cards are even more impressive. The PSA 10-level All-Star Rookie Card has an average annualized return of approximately 18.3% in 2024, outperforming major stock indices.

The entire TCG market was valued at approximately US$6.6-8.4 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to US$16.9 billion by 2035.

The rules you must understand to succeed in this market

The value of a card isn't something you can just decide—it needs to be backed by a rating agency.

PSA is the most authoritative, with a perfect score of 10. The same card can have a price difference of several times, even dozens of times, between a PSA 10 and a PSA 9. The reason Logan Paul's Pikachu card sold for 16.5 million was primarily due to its PSA 10 rating.

Scarcity itself is a design element. Take Pokémon as an example: rarity increases in stages, with full-art cards featuring Special Illustration Rare designs being the most sought-after in recent years. The highest premium is generated by a combination of craftsmanship scarcity, grading certification, and IP popularity.

The card market also has cycles.

The period from 2002 to 2015 was a "dormant period" for the Pokémon trading card market. After the first wave of Pokémon fever (1999-2001), the market cooled down significantly, and many people sold off their childhood collections of cards at low prices, resulting in a large number of high-quality first-edition cards flooding the second-hand market at extremely low prices. This period is the source of many of today's top-tier auction items.

Prior to 2018, the sports trading card market was relatively low. It wasn't until the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent stay-at-home orders in 2020, coupled with the stay-at-home economy, abundant liquidity, and a wave of nostalgia among millennials, that an epic bull market was triggered. 2020-2021 marked the peak price period for the entire trading card market.

2020-2021 saw the price peak: the stay-at-home economy, abundant liquidity, and millennial nostalgia fueled an epic bull market. Interest rate hikes in 2022 led to an overall correction. Starting in 2025, with the Pokémon 30th anniversary hype and a return to liquidity, the market will become active again. The pattern is clear: every bear market presents an opportunity to acquire high-quality, rare Pokémon cards.

Web3 has arrived, what has it brought?

Blockchain has not changed the nature of cards, but it has changed the way they are distributed.

On-chain NFT cards belong to your wallet and can be taken even if the platform shuts down. Traditional physical card transactions take five days to settle, while on-chain transactions are completed in five seconds. High-value cards can also be held in smaller increments, staked, and used for lending.

The most popular approach is to tokenize physical cards (RWA).

@Courtyard_io is the largest on-chain card marketplace, partnering to store physical cards, with over 500,000 collectibles already on-chain. Monthly sales grew from $50,000 in January 2024 to $80 million in August 2025—a 1600-fold increase in 18 months. In July 2025, it completed a $30 million Series A funding round, with Y Combinator participating.

Collector Crypt, deployed on Solana, is projected to have a cumulative trading volume exceeding $150 million by 2025. The $CARDS token saw its FDV surge from $67 million to over $600 million within a week of its launch.

The entire tokenized Pokémon card market saw a transaction volume of $124.5 million in August 2025 alone.

From the time Garfield designed Magic: The Gathering in 1993 to the time a single card sold for $16.5 million in 2026, only thirty years passed.

The core of this business has never changed: scarcity + collectability + exchange value.

What has changed is the scale and the technology that supports it.

That bag of cards you bought with your allowance when you were a child might really be the best asset you ever acquired.

I compared the traditional online integrated trading market with the RWA trading market and found that putting assets and transaction processes on the blockchain does indeed improve transaction efficiency.

Somewhat counterintuitively, the trading volume and revenue of @courtyard_io and @Collector_Crypt have been steadily increasing. This suggests that their businesses do not rely solely on crypto speculators who prioritize trading.

Currently, the only on-chain TCG tokens are $CARDS and $BIRB, which we should keep an eye on. Collector Crypt is overly concentrated in terms of both active users and the $CARDS token structure, with a significant number of investors holding locked-in tokens; we recommend continuing to observe in the short term.

Market Opportunity
Collector Crypt Logo
Collector Crypt Price(CARDS)
$0.03804
$0.03804$0.03804
-0.20%
USD
Collector Crypt (CARDS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump Brothers’ American Bitcoin Hits BTC Milestone as Stock Falls to Lowest Price Since IPO

Trump Brothers’ American Bitcoin Hits BTC Milestone as Stock Falls to Lowest Price Since IPO

The post Trump Brothers’ American Bitcoin Hits BTC Milestone as Stock Falls to Lowest Price Since IPO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief American Bitcoin
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/31 01:01
What the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) Means for ETH’s Future

What the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) Means for ETH’s Future

The Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) is a new framework backed by the Ethereum Foundation, Gnosis, and Zisk that aims to address one of Ethereum’s biggest structural
Share
Ethnews2026/03/31 01:12
USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

A heated contest for control over a new dollar-pegged token has set the stage for what analysts say could define the next phase of the stablecoin industry. According to Bloomberg, a bidding war unfolded on Hyperliquid, one of crypto’s fastest-growing trading platforms, with the prize being the right to issue USDH, its native stablecoin. The competition drew some of the sector’s most prominent names, including Paxos, Sky, and Ethena, who later withdrew their bid, alongside the lesser-known Native Markets, a startup backed by Stripe stablecoin subsidiary Bridge. Hyperliquid Stablecoin Race Shows Branding and Partnerships Matter as Much as Tech Over the weekend, Hyperliquid’s validators, the contributors who secure the network and vote on key decisions, awarded the USDH contract to Native Markets over the weekend. Despite its relatively new status, the firm’s connection with Stripe helped it outpace more established rivals. Stablecoins underpin decentralized finance by providing a dollar-backed medium for collateral, settlement, and payments across applications. What began as a grassroots, community-led sector has evolved into a battleground for institutions and payment companies seeking revenue from interest on reserves. Circle, for example, shares proceeds from its USDC with Coinbase under a partnership designed to stabilize earnings during market swings. The Hyperliquid contest offered a rare glimpse into just how intense competition has become. Paxos pledged to take no revenue until USDH surpassed $1 billion in circulation. Agora offered to share 100% of net revenue with Hyperliquid, while Ethena put forward 95%. All were outbid by Native Markets, whose ties to Stripe’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and subsequent rollout of the Tempo blockchain positioned it as a strong contender. “Every stablecoin issuer is extremely desperate for supply,” said Zaheer Ebtikar, co-founder of Split Capital. “They are willing to publicly announce how much they are willing to offer. It just shows it’s a very tough business for stablecoin issuers.” While USDC remains dominant on Hyperliquid with more than $5.6 billion in deposits, the arrival of USDH could shift flows and revenue dynamics. Paxos co-founder Bhau Kotecha said the firm sees the exchange’s growth as an important opportunity, while Agora’s co-founder Nick van Eck warned that awarding the contract to a vertically integrated issuer risked undermining decentralization. Regulatory positioning also factored into the debate. Paxos operates under a New York trust charter and is seeking a federal license, while Bridge holds money transmitter approvals in 30 states. Native Markets, in a blog post, cited regulatory flexibility and deployment speed as reasons for its selection. Hyperliquid said the strong engagement from its community validated the process. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissed concerns over USDC’s status, noting on X that competition benefits the ecosystem. Analysts suggested that fears of centralization may be exaggerated, noting that Hyperliquid is likely to remain neutral and support multiple stablecoins. Still, the contest over USDH highlighted a new reality for stablecoins: branding, partnerships, and business strategy are becoming as decisive as technology. Native Markets Secures USDH Stablecoin Mandate on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid has concluded its governance vote for the USDH stablecoin, awarding the mandate to Native Markets after a closely watched process that drew weeks of community debate and rival proposals. USDH, described by Hyperliquid as a “Hyperliquid-first, compliant, and natively minted” dollar-backed token, is intended to reduce the platform’s dependence on USDC and strengthen its spot markets. Validators on the decentralized exchange voted in favor of Native Markets, a relatively new player backed by Stripe’s Bridge subsidiary, over established contenders including Paxos and Ethena. The outcome followed a string of proposals offering aggressive revenue-sharing terms to win validator support, underscoring the scale of incentives attached to controlling USDH. Hyperliquid’s exchange has become a critical hub for stablecoin liquidity, with $5.7 billion in USDC, around 8% of its total supply, currently held on the network. At prevailing treasury yields, that translates to an estimated $200 million to $220 million in annual revenue for Circle, underlining why a native alternative could be transformative. Hyperliquid’s validators, who secure the network and vote on key decisions, selected Native Markets following an on-chain governance process that concluded September 15. Native Markets has laid out a phased rollout for USDH, beginning with capped minting and redemption trials before expanding into spot markets. Its reserves will be managed in cash and treasuries by BlackRock, with on-chain tokenization through Superstate and Bridge. Yield from those reserves will be split between Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund and ecosystem development. The launch of USDH comes as Hyperliquid records record profits from perpetual futures trading, with $106 million in revenue in August alone, and prepares to slash spot trading fees by 80% to bolster liquidity. Analysts say the move positions Hyperliquid to capture more of the stablecoin economics internally, marking a significant step in its bid to rival the largest players in decentralized finance
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:48